| Author |
p800 vs 7650 |
Mattias
Joined: Dec 13, 2002
Posts: 21
PM |
Orka, you can't mean that! Are you drunk?  P800 has very bad build quality, feels cheep and plastic (ugly to). The firmware is quite buggy. I will choose the 7650 because:
Better build quality.
Better mechanic solution (camera protection).
Less buggs than P800.
More 3:e part software.
Less uglier than P800.
Better camera (at night).
Nokia is better on software and mechanic than SE.
/Mattias |
|
|
Daredevil
Joined: Jan 21, 2003
Posts: 99
From: ZH, Switzerland
PM |
better camera protection? the P800 also has a protection! not that you can cover it up just like the 7650 but the lens is behind screens ( i don't know how to say that ) nobody would put a camera with no protection!!
Less uglier?? so you say that 7650 is ugly?? Less bugs?? well until now i haven't found no bugs in my P800! with my 7650 i already updated it twice! and btw, the P800 must have bugs, cuz it's new in the market and the 7650 is already 6 or more months old. 7650 has a bad picture quality at night. you can't see things when you look at it!
More 3rd Party softwares?? c'mon how long is the P800 out?? answer that and then you'll have your answer!!
Just becuz i rock, doesn't mean i'm made of stone!! |
cyanx7
Joined: Jan 02, 2003
Posts: 228
From: Porto, Portugal
PM |
@mattias:
u really mean BUILDING quality in that case, right?
The garbage man is happy as a young maiden losing virginity...  I GOTTA GARBAGE THREAD WITH MY NAME ON IT! YEAH!  Shithappens just became my blood brother and Bjerkebanen my blood sister...  |
Rashkae
Joined: Jun 03, 2002
Posts: > 500
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2003-01-21 20:19, Mattias wrote:
Better build quality.
Better mechanic solution (camera protection).
Less buggs than P800.
More 3:e part software.
Less uglier than P800.
Better camera (at night).
|
|
Let's see now:
1. Arguable; I've seen 7650s break into 2 pieces from a simple fall onto a carpet
2. NO "slide" design is good; it leads to a much higher rate of failure, is a weakpoint in any design and can get eroded or corroded easily. Also, it's a major spot for mechanical and structural failure (see answer number 1)
3. Less bugs? Perhaps, but easily corrected. But with about 2-3 times the features, having 2 times the bugs just makes them more noticeable. 
4. How much 3rd-party software was out when the 7650 came out? Not much either, huh?
5. "Less uglier"? Well, this all depends on taste; can't argue with you just because our tastes differ.
6. Better camera? A lot of people make a fuss about the 7650 "nightshot", but this can be easily replicated (and even done better) using the P800 advanced camera controls. In either case, the picture quality of the P800 is better, with a sharper focus and none of that horrid blue-tint to all photographs. |
fijbert
Joined: Dec 26, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Montreal / Beirut
PM, WWW
|
This topic exists already
use the search function next time
Nobody is perfect, I am nobody, therefore I am perfect |
pachy
Joined: Nov 05, 2002
Posts: > 500
PM |
@Mattias, Your another "psychic phone tester" are`nt you.
I have a p800 & it isn`t buggy you idiot. |
Deltayoda
Joined: Mar 03, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Los Angeles, California
PM |
Given the P800 and 7650 a try, and I like the P800 much better than the Nokia 7650. |
Orka
Joined: Jan 01, 2002
Posts: 310
From: Greece
PM |
@Mattias
You can tell your opinion without insalting anyone here my friend! Obviously you are drunk. Not me!
There is no NOKIA phone with good build quality. Nokia phones for that particular aspect, are simply acceptable and that is a fact admited by all people. Especially 7650 has very poor quality, the lowest possible for an expensive smartphone. I agree with people saying that slide produces more problems than the ones its solving.
As far as bugs are concerned, everybody knows that NOKIA phones especially the latest models are extremelly bugy...
Probably you are a lucky owner of bug free NOKIA 7650 phone. Congratulations.
[ This Message was edited by: Orka on 2003-01-21 20:12 ]
[ This Message was edited by: Orka on 2003-01-21 20:14 ] |
Raven
Joined: Jul 01, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Norway
PM |
@Orka,
Please stop posting your own opinions like they are FACTS! Because they are just your OPINIONS.
I'm so sick of peeps posting their own personal opinions all over the place, claiming it to be commonly known facts.
I'm also sick of ppl who don't know sh!t about mobile technology and the marketing industry, posting lameA$$ theories about why "Nokia sucks and SE rules" etc.. bla bla bla... Please grow up!
carpe noctem |
Daredevil
Joined: Jan 21, 2003
Posts: 99
From: ZH, Switzerland
PM |
i'm with you raven!! i mean i have them both so i can compare them whenever i want!!
Just becuz i rock, doesn't mean i'm made of stone!! |
HolyPikachu
Joined: Oct 30, 2002
Posts: 15
From: Indonesia
PM |
7650 is A LOT BETTER AND CONVENIENCE than P800!!!
1). A lot 3rd party software (Hundreds of games and application, super VIDEO RECORDING from Hantro technology!)(. COOL!!
2). 7650 is released on JULY, P800 on DECEMBER, but not NOT HYPE ENOUGH to compete with a nice 7650 (in term of pic shot quality).
3). Coolest ever pic shot quality CAMERA PHONE beat GD87 and sure.... P800, u are nothing SE! The nightshot quality is really cool on 7650.
4). No worries about place 7650 on jacket or anyplace, cause there is THE LENS PROTECTION (slide! Yupyyy) 
5). P800 has unusual jogdial navigation gives the user long curve experience to use it (less convenience tough).
6). No any news of upcoming SE phone release ... Has SE passed away? 
Kudo Nokia,
Welcome 3530, 6100, 6610, 3510i, 8910i, 5100, 6650, 3650 (and prev released 7650, 7210)... so many great 4096 phone of Nokia... SE? SE? Only one ...
[ This Message was edited by: HolyPikachu on 2003-01-22 02:50 ] |
Miss UK
Joined: Jan 11, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM |
Ive seen a Nokia Flip phone on the Nokia site its available only in Asia, looks dead nice.. hope it comes out here inda UK Or a similar model is made! SE P80- luks ok.
This message was posted from a WAP device |
yiannis
Joined: Feb 10, 2002
Posts: 11
PM |
you are so f**ing stupid. Just a SIMPLE point to make only the fact that u r comparing the 2 phones gives 7650 a GREAT advantage why u may ask?
Because u can get it for free from many places like dialaphone.com, whereas the p800 which is arguably better is a monstrous 600 pounds.
i rest my case...
[ This Message was edited by: yiannis on 2003-01-22 03:02 ]
[ This Message was edited by: yiannis on 2003-01-22 03:03 ] |
Raven
Joined: Jul 01, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Norway
PM |
@HolyPikachu, you obviously haven't even seen a P800, let alone tried one. You're just making a fool of yourselves comparing the two. I've owned both, and yes it's true about the extra software and the night vision thing, but on every other area the 7650 takes a beating. Just stop comparing them, they aren't even in the same league.
This message was posted from a P800 |
HolyPikachu
Joined: Oct 30, 2002
Posts: 15
From: Indonesia
PM |
Sure, I have seen P800, my friend has one. And now he has been boring with it ...
Yup, maybe the lack of software couldn't make any amausement
And the camera is (I MUST ADMIT 7650 IS BETTER IN CAMERA PHONE) more complicated setting and less quality than 7650
He seldom used the PDA function.
But he likes MP3 player very much.
That's all |
|
|
Posted: 2003-01-21 20:19
