Esato

Forum > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > Weird (stupid) decisions of Sony Ericsson

Previous  123  Next
Author Weird (stupid) decisions of Sony Ericsson
mediar
Xperia Neo Black
Joined: May 05, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: Varna, Bulgaria
PM, WWW
Posted: 2009-02-14 14:45
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
However, C903 doesn't have WiFi and that's bad.
The best mobile phone brand died with Sony Ericsson's death. Shame on you Sony for killing it! And, of course, for ruining the Xperia brand...
Mediar's Site
golemsmate
C905 Black
Joined: Nov 09, 2007
Posts: 442
From: United Kingdom
PM
Posted: 2009-02-14 14:53
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
thats because it is aimed as a cheaper phone, if it had wifi it would be very very similar to c905, have a range of phones that have a range of features then surely one will suit everybody
mediar
Xperia Neo Black
Joined: May 05, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: Varna, Bulgaria
PM, WWW
Posted: 2009-02-14 18:37
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
So why its number is C903. I should be C705.
The best mobile phone brand died with Sony Ericsson's death. Shame on you Sony for killing it! And, of course, for ruining the Xperia brand...
Mediar's Site
se_dude
Xperia Arc Silver
Joined: Nov 07, 2007
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2009-02-14 18:40
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
G705 has wifi and is pretty cheap. In fact one of the cheapest wifi phnes around.
goldenface
Sony Xperia Z3 Compact
Joined: Dec 17, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Liverpool City Centre
PM
Posted: 2009-02-14 19:37
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
I've yet to see a phone that was above criticism, no phone is perfect.
DCUK7
Xperia X10 Mini Black
Joined: Aug 01, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Liverpool, UK
PM
Posted: 2009-02-14 19:46
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Yes, no phone is perfect. If it was, how could it be improved upon.

I do think SE make unsound decisions with regards to phone specs, especially in more recent times.

For me, video calling was never crucial and I've only used it a few times. I can see the point though that for the people who do like using it, SE phones don't make it a nice user experience for them.

Video calling should be handled one of two ways. The Apple way, which basically means not including it in a 3G handset (I know others have done this but I use Apple as the example as its the highest profile phone to do this). The other way to do it is to include it and put a front-facing camera on the phone.

Any manufacturer who includes a video call function but not a front-facing camera obviously just tacked video calling on so it could be included in the specs. It makes absolutely no sense in terms of user experience!
Formerly ~DC:UK~
Bhavv
Nokia Lumia 920
Joined: Jun 07, 2007
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2009-02-15 09:32
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2009-02-13 16:10:17, tbroe wrote:

On 2009-02-13 16:01:29, Mige wrote:
prefer nokia



and samsung

se just doesn't do it for me anymore for reasons like this.


QFT. The OP forgot that exclude Wifi from all their phones, dont have full VGA video recording, and they still only have 2.4 inch screens as the max on most handsets, ignoring the X1 experia because it only has 3.2 Mpix camera.

So many manufacturers make better quality handset then do.
gtr83
C905 Black
Joined: Sep 27, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: Indonesia
PM
Posted: 2009-02-15 11:14
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Are you sure they excluded wifi from all their phones?
mediar
Xperia Neo Black
Joined: May 05, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: Varna, Bulgaria
PM, WWW
Posted: 2009-02-15 12:05
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
I don' think so - the models and more have WiFi - C905, G900, P1, W960, X1, G705, W705 and more. So many phones have WiFi.
The best mobile phone brand died with Sony Ericsson's death. Shame on you Sony for killing it! And, of course, for ruining the Xperia brand...
Mediar's Site
gtr83
C905 Black
Joined: Sep 27, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: Indonesia
PM
Posted: 2009-02-15 13:45
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
It's true that other manufacturers make higher quality handsets than , notably Samsung. I would think that should slash its unit prices by 20-30% if they want to keep being competitive.
Nokia 3520 > 6600 > W800i > W890i > C702 > C905 > BB 9500 > Samsung INNOV8
mediar
Xperia Neo Black
Joined: May 05, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: Varna, Bulgaria
PM, WWW
Posted: 2009-02-15 14:10
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
I agree with this. Higher quality or lower price.
The best mobile phone brand died with Sony Ericsson's death. Shame on you Sony for killing it! And, of course, for ruining the Xperia brand...
Mediar's Site
Aivar
T68i
Joined: Jan 14, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Estonia
PM
Posted: 2009-02-16 11:03
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2009-02-14 19:37:45, goldenface wrote:
I've yet to see a phone that was above criticism, no phone is perfect.


Of course there is not a perfect phone. I just want to emphasise: there is always something SE ruins with nice phone.

I also don't need videocall often, but sometimes I like to use it. I repeat myself one more time: so I really can't understand, why the hell SE removed frontal video call camera on the higher level model C901 (and put that feature on lower level C510).

And it's not only about video calls, please read my first post again.

PS: Now SE introduced network polyglot phone W995 with a frontal camera. Really good! But the problem is for me: I don't like slider phone. Sure it's my problem, but why SE sipmly removes frontal camera in some 3G phones? I really don't understand that.

And more, there is now 2 version od W995:

GSM/GPRS/EDGE 850/900/1800/1900 UMTS/HSPA 900/2100
GSM/GPRS/EDGE 850/900/1800/1900 UMTS/HSPA 850/1900/2100

Why to make two version, if the difference is only one UMTS frequency!? It does not make any harm to offer only one version including all networks systems and frequencies..


[ This Message was edited by: Aivar on 2009-02-16 12:27 ]
jdnodcam
K618 white
Joined: Dec 18, 2008
Posts: 28
From: Makati City, Philippines
PM
Posted: 2009-02-19 05:48
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Guess we really wouldnt know the "whys" until we ask SE, definitely they have the reasons on why they came up with these desicions and not the way some of us wanted their products to be. For now we all have to setlle on what they currently offers and from there prioritize the features that we really need.
hwars
T68 gold
Joined: Sep 02, 2007
Posts: 65
PM
Posted: 2009-02-19 11:32
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2009-02-13 11:03:14, Aivar wrote:
Recently SE introduced a relly great mobile phone C510.....
But then SE decided to ruin that good news also. SE decided that only American market can enjoy that kind of phone. The other world will get a cut version (without UMTS 850/1900 and even without GSM 850!).

From where did you get this info?
Aivar
T68i
Joined: Jan 14, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Estonia
PM
Posted: 2009-02-19 12:04
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2009-02-19 11:32:36, hwars wrote:

On 2009-02-13 11:03:14, Aivar wrote:
Recently SE introduced a relly great mobile phone C510.....
But then SE decided to ruin that good news also. SE decided that only American market can enjoy that kind of phone. The other world will get a cut version (without UMTS 850/1900 and even without GSM 850!).

From where did you get this info?


From the direct source, Sony Ericsson website:

Availability and versions
Networks

C510:
GSM/GPRS/EDGE 900/1800/1900
UMTS/HSPA 2100
C510a:
GSM/GPRS/EDGE 850/900/1800/1900
UMTS/HSPA 850/1900/2100
C510c:
GSM/GPRS/EDGE 900/1800/1900
Available in selected markets from Q1 2009.
Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi