| Author |
C902, C702 or K850i what one to buy |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
C902 all the way. But k850 is cheaper, go for c902 if you have the money
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-07-31 11:05 ] |
|
|
carkitter
Joined: Apr 29, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: Auckland, NZ
PM |
W890 here, due to best looking, thinnest and cheap.
C702 close second - gains better cam but loses style and costs more.
If I was going to consider the higher priced K850 and C902 then I would also add N95 mk1 which would kick butt on paper. It'd be hard to choose K850i or C902 over '2007 phone of the year'.
|
masada1971
Joined: Jun 05, 2008
Posts: > 500
PM |
anything else but k850..shitty phone indeed... |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
sad that c702 pictures have so much noise (compared to k800/k810 it quite big different).
strange that  make a new 3 m.p phone with such a noisy camera. or maybe it just a new cam driver who needs. (we can hope so)
until then, i see many reasons to buy C902 
good luck........................
--------------------------
my votes are;
¤ c902
# K850
# C702
_________________
I C902,  W810 &  T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-08-03 07:56 ] |
number1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM |
Sure the c702's pic have a little noise but i'd rather a bit of noise to mega aggresive post-processing which wipes all details from the pic making it look like a smeary mess the c902 seems to be the best at that closey followed by the k850 then the k800 check the photo section.
see this one from the c902 it's only iso 200 but the post-processing is really bad even at a really low iso
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=13520
here another one bye bye all details
http://www.esato.com/phonepho[....]&make=sony+ericsson&model=c902
another one
http://www.esato.com/phonepho[....]&make=sony+ericsson&model=c902
This one is quite shocking the amount of post-processing on iso 100
http://www.esato.com/phonepho[....]&make=sony+ericsson&model=c902
some more
http://img253.imageshack.us/img253/5150/dsc00380zq4.jpg
http://img155.imageshack.us/img155/4844/dsc00381kf4.jpg
http://img413.imageshack.us/img413/1411/dsc00383vp3.jpg
http://img262.imageshack.us/img262/9456/dsc00385jv4.jpg
id rather have the noise in the c702's pics
http://www.esato.com/phonepho[....]&make=sony+ericsson&model=c702
http://www.esato.com/phonepho[....]&make=sony+ericsson&model=c702
http://www.esato.com/phonepho[....]&make=sony+ericsson&model=c702
http://www.esato.com/phonepho[....]&make=sony+ericsson&model=c702
http://www.esato.com/phonepho[....]&make=sony+ericsson&model=c702
c702 VS k800 VS s700 in very lowlight
c702
http://i222.photobucket.com/a[....]d234/sniper100590/DSC00091.jpg
k800
http://i222.photobucket.com/a[....]d234/sniper100590/DSC00096.jpg
s700
http://www.esato.com/phonepho[....]n/s700i/200807250035oEA8mS.jpg
|
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
mega aggresive post-processing which wipes all details from the pic making it look like a smeary mess
WTF are you talking about? if my photos from K800 looks like a smeary mess then your photos from C702 should looks like pictures from INNOV8 prototype. is this true? I don't think so, except of better low light handling C702 doesn't have nothing to call it better than K800. maybe you didn't noticed this but post-processing in all SE phones based on MCB cameras is almost (if not 100%) identical. your C702 isn't exception
_________________
K800 R1KG001
raider.4shared.com
flickr.com/photos/raiderek
[ This Message was edited by: Raiderski on 2008-08-03 12:58 ] |
number1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM |
I own both the k800 & c702, the c702 just produces better more detailed pics the post-processing is not as aggressive.
|
jigonx
Joined: Oct 16, 2007
Posts: 327
PM |
If u want cybershot phone with best detail and good low light picture, go for K770  |
Coquito
Joined: Mar 28, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Moca, Rep.Dom
PM, WWW
|
On 2008-07-31 07:28:41, herodile wrote:
since the latest update mine k850i is just
perfect I had never had such a good phone
awesome
yeah, with the new RF1 firmware k850 is very stable.
I dont like C902 because the screen is small, i d prefer the c702 in case i want a new C-series phone. |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
@phonecrzy. C902 have little better camera then K850, and quite much bette /sharper then C702. (thats my oppinion after seen lots of pictures)
-------------------------------------------------------------
edit.........i also dont understand Number1 here.
that C902 & k800 should have bad details (looks smeary) ?????? they have good balance between noise and colors saturation. (so far i can see)
so, you tell me, where does this c902 pictures looks smeary.
(for a cell phone of course. compared with a DSLR, even C905 will looks like shit)
dont bother to upload some more pics. it dosent mather anyway.
_________________
I C902, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-08-03 15:58 ] |
number1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM |
by smeary i was reffering to the lower light pics, but the outdoor 1's don't seem much better look at the 100% crops perfect made,
the macros are fine, but the others are hardly great quality
[ This Message was edited by: number1 on 2008-08-03 16:14 ] |
herodile
Joined: Jul 26, 2008
Posts: 45
PM |
good pictures
but if you look
at the material
from
post k850i pictures
esato forum
they are amazing
special with flowers |
|
|
Posted: 2008-07-31 12:02
