| Author |
Samsung i8510 INNOV8 *official now* |
jjjajjj
Joined: Jan 24, 2007
Posts: 180
PM |
If they uses the same cam model, why there are different in lans dimensions ?
And can someone tell me why Samsung always try very hard to COPY Specifications from other companies ?
like this one , It is a mix from the C905 , N96 & LG Viewty
WiTh LoVE |
|
|
S4k1s
Joined: Mar 09, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden
PM |
Beautiful. |
banyu
Joined: Jun 06, 2007
Posts: 4
PM, WWW
|
wow,
best symbian so far (with divx and 8MP maybe this samsung has better processor than N96)
but of course,
the price will be high,
higher than C905 or even X1. |
NightBlade
Joined: Jul 29, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Nessebar, Bulgaria
PM |
Despite everything, the C905 is a flagship feature phone, while this Samsung one is a flagship smartphone. This one is bound to cost much more than the C905 (me thinks).
Also, it's much larger than the C905, will probably have bad battery life and its screen has bad pixel density (a la N95 8GB).
Aw, you know me, always with the disclaimers. 
|
xell
Joined: Jan 15, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM, WWW
|
According to Eldar, it will cost the same or will be slightly cheaper than C905. I guess that means something around 550€ to C905's 590€. |
crossmatched
Joined: Jan 05, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: RP
PM, WWW
|
hope  releases UIQ cybershot with the same c905 cam module
www.secondmanonthemoon.blogspot.com
we are all works under progress |
Dextrr
Joined: Dec 16, 2006
Posts: 279
From: New York
PM |
Nighblade:
Dude, let it be released before you comment on the "pixel density" and "bad battery". It might be a little longer and wider (due to the 2.8' screen) but it's thinner than the porky C905!!!!!!!
I'd rather have an average 16m big screen over a small 262k great screen anyday. 262k is sooooo 2005. |
troublesam
Joined: Jul 02, 2008
Posts: 47
PM, WWW
|
it's like N96 and LG viewty in one body...is samsung running out of design??
[ This Message was edited by: troublesam on 2008-07-12 12:08 ] |
QVGA
Joined: May 23, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pakistan
PM, WWW
|
On 2008-07-12 12:44:12, NightBlade wrote:
Aw, you know me, always whining pointlessly
correction made
|
NightBlade
Joined: Jul 29, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Nessebar, Bulgaria
PM |
On 2008-07-12 12:57:59, Dextrr wrote:
Nighblade:
Dude, let it be released before you comment on the "pixel density" and "bad battery". It might be a little longer and wider (due to the 2.8' screen) but it's thinner than the porky C905!!!!!!!
Well just do the math, the screen's obiously QVGA and a 2.8" diagonal would have the pixels stretched a tad too much.
As for the battery life, well, the housing is a bit too thin to contain a reasonably powerful battery (considering all the things it needs to power and all the things already in the housing). And besides, Samsung's rarely been that good with battery life.
|
xironghostx
Joined: Feb 06, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden
PM |
Well done Samsung.
Byebye Sonyericsson... |
sunSEt_
Joined: Oct 15, 2007
Posts: 43
PM |
A really hard competitor for Shiho!  |
djin
Joined: Jun 13, 2007
Posts: > 500
PM |
@Nightblade
Its got 1200mah battery. that would give good battery life. |
QVGA
Joined: May 23, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pakistan
PM, WWW
|
Dont you know nightblade was the one who designed this phone? HE knows the ins and outs, more specifically the "math" part of the phone. He judges battery life by the thinness of the housing and screen quality by the size of the display.
My W950 is thinner and its got a reasonable battery, so first use, then complain.
Seriously dude, give it up. You're now crossing into the plankgatan territory.
_________________
HBH-DS970
[ This Message was edited by: QVGA on 2008-07-12 13:11 ]
[ This Message was edited by: QVGA on 2008-07-12 13:13 ] |
amawanqa
Joined: May 08, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Hornchurch UK & East London SA
PM |
Wow. Impressive stuff, Samsung!
He who laughs last... thinks slowest.
Nokia 5800, Sony Ericsson P1i, Nokia 7600. |
|
|
Posted: 2008-07-12 12:32
