| Author |
G900 "Definitely NOT recommended rating" -Review |
mario2004
Joined: Sep 16, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: South Africa
PM, WWW
|
Yeah,by now we all know the 'phone' is another total crap/failure from Sorryericsson. No wonder they are going down even faster then Motorola. And before you all go on about my poor spelling (after all you have to criticize something to defend SE's breath taking and innovative tech.),I suggest you wait for the 2nd quarter finacial results and see what for the 'non fanboys' have 'voted' with their wallets. I for one stand at my opinion and hope SE will do something to return to the former glory. But then again, probably you chaps are right,everything is perfect as is and SE should'nt change.
'Better govern our selfs the wrong way, then be governed by 'others' the right way.'
- Robert Mugabe - Freedom fighter comarade, peoples hero and President of Zimbabwe. |
|
|
c96sthl
Joined: Mar 31, 2002
Posts: > 500
PM |
put aside SE failed to launch interesting new stuff to please fan
i believe the writer don't even know what G700 and G900 was meant for.
I remember it was meant to be a mass market product.
so he shouldn't compare it with flag ship smartphone...in fact this might be the first year we didn't see any flag ship uiq smartphone announced.... maybe 2nd half of the year? or it will never be out since Paris/ Beibei got cancelled. which is already widely discuss else where
to summarize my standpoint...some reviewer don't look overall picture...i don't blame them but at the end of the day we make our own judgement whether we should buy one product. |
soulsaber
Joined: Mar 20, 2008
Posts: 86
From: Canada
PM |
I was split between the G900 and N82 for a very long time...and since they basically cost the same (N82 being a bit cheaper), I eventually went for nokia...it just seemed like such a rip off for the amount of money that I have to pay for.....just a touchscreen.
It's been nice knowing you K810 lol
If you fail to plan, you plan to fail. |
carkitter
Joined: Apr 29, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: Auckland, NZ
PM |
On 2008-07-01 03:08:18, c96sthl wrote:
put aside SE failed to launch interesting new stuff to please fan
i believe the writer don't even know what G700 and G900 was meant for.
I remember it was meant to be a mass market product.
Agreed. I haven't watched the video yet so won't comment on that.
But the G900 has a place in the SE lineup. SE haven't done a non-walkman mid range UIQ phone as far as I know, and 5.0Mp + UIQ is a first for SE.
Not my cup-of-tea but will suit plenty of others I expect.
|
ares
Joined: Dec 11, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Coimbra, Portugal
PM |
On 2008-07-01 00:53:00, ares wrote:
Man, this video is better than 'the office'...comedy expert?
Btw, to see what g900 camera is about, just have to look to esato's g900 photo thread  People there might not be 'experts' though...
rofl fcukin hilarious shiz:D
comedy expert indeed
And mario2004 can join the cast!!! It will be a super-hit!
SE w880 + Iphone 4 16gb |
strizlow800
Joined: Aug 23, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Macedonia, Skopje
PM |
I agree with carkitter... The G900 is the first  phone that has 5.0mp camera... This phone looks like standard phone (most of non smartphones look like that)... And in my opinion this phone would be bought from many non-smartphone users because it's standard look, so smartphone users number will be much higher...
P.S. This phone reminds me of the K610, I don't know why haha
|
Keiki
Joined: Mar 27, 2008
Posts: 160
From: Valhalla
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2008-07-01 10:50:12, strizlow800 wrote:
The G900 is the first phone that has 5.0mp camera...
|
|
It should be K850 
This message was posted from BlackBerry 8900 |
MADReaLJL
Joined: May 22, 2006
Posts: 35
PM |
i thought this is one of the best product from SE currently.. 5 MP camera, UIQ devices, touchscreen combined to a small and elegant phone |
loligo
Joined: Jun 28, 2008
Posts: 22
PM |
And it is...we should rate G900 from all possible perspectives & G900 is a very practical smartphone,nuff said:-) |
TCM
Joined: Jul 17, 2007
Posts: 36
From: Amsterdam
PM |
To be honest, this is the best phone i ever had. The P1i was nice, but not nearly as nice as the g900. The form factor and the size are important, but also the interface is very good imo. |
goldenface
Joined: Dec 17, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Liverpool City Centre
PM |
On 2008-07-01 02:48:26, mario2004 wrote:
Yeah,by now we all know the 'phone' is another total crap/failure from Sorryericsson. No wonder they are going down even faster then Motorola. And before you all go on about my poor spelling (after all you have to criticize something to defend SE's breath taking and innovative tech.),I suggest you wait for the 2nd quarter finacial results and see what for the 'non fanboys' have 'voted' with their wallets. I for one stand at my opinion and hope SE will do something to return to the former glory. But then again, probably you chaps are right,everything is perfect as is and SE should'nt change.
Really Mario, with the amount of crap that comes out of our mouth sometimes I'm surprised we can tell one end of you from the other!
There isn't one single reason why they're issuing profit warnings, its a combination of factors.
The C902 is selling well was is the W890i. They just need more phones and need to get them out faster.
Like I always said, a larger company is more stable, less likely to be taken over and can ride the storms more easily.
Funny how for the past two years SE has been gunning for the lower end in order to grow market share but was criticised for doing so. Now its been effected by a high-end slow down and people are wondering why it has been affected so badly. 
[ This Message was edited by: goldenface on 2008-07-01 16:46 ] |
troublesam
Joined: Jul 02, 2008
Posts: 47
PM, WWW
|
the G900 is a very good alternative to the P1, specifically if they have qualms bout the qwerty rocker keypad. it could have been a dif'rent story if it had been released 6 months to 1 year earlier. but I could still say that the G900 is one of the finest offering from Sony Ericsson. |
kjao
Joined: Apr 24, 2007
Posts: 200
PM |
interesting that this thread is drawing more posts than the more constructive G900 discussion thread  |
sesukaku
Joined: Sep 23, 2006
Posts: 127
PM |
well.. to be honest, i don't get it when they are bragging about the late introduction for this phone at least a year? i didn't even see anything that come close to this offering, not even by any other manufacturer up until they introduce the phone. Even until today, no other manufacturer has this kind of offering.
They are supposed to be embarrassed for posting such a review. They don't even realize that Sony Ericsson doesn't even market this phone as a camera phone!! they are promoting this phone for the sake of bringing compact smartphone that doesn't look like one. lolx.. they totally miss out the point. |
luifailong
Joined: Dec 29, 2007
Posts: 10
PM |
I've been using this phone for over a month now and i am enjoying. Basically this phone is for the small people, knows little of everything and whose main function is as a phone. But it also doesn't mean that it is not fitted for the techies. I mean, yeah the OS is kinda old but it works.
*Oh yeah Mizzle, I can't access USEB at home it always gives me Error 404. I'm in Hong Kong btw.
[ This Message was edited by: luifailong on 2008-07-02 06:29 ] |
|
|
Posted: 2008-07-01 02:48
Sony Ericsson software/hardware support! 
