| Author |
K850i vs N95 pic quality |
BobaFett
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
|
to be honest, i was disappointed any kind of n95 pix, also landscapes...
and yes, the xenon flash is a big positive for se fones, imo they should use it as standard in the future, cos those fone lights are really outdated
|
|
|
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
n95 pics have such a big contrast.......the colors looks often unreal, (nearly like cartoon)
_________________
I  k850i,  w810i &  T28
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2007-10-26 17:10 ] |
mib1800
Joined: Mar 18, 2004
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2007-10-26 18:09:24, plankgatan wrote:
n95 pics have such a big contrast.......the colors looks often unreal, (nearly like cartoon)
_________________
I k850i, w810i & T28
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2007-10-26 17:10 ]
Well according to this review N95 algorithm outperforms K850:-
http://smape.com/en/reviews/n[....]Ericsson_K850ivsNokia_N95.html
"...The N95 produced a more saturated image with a realistic color rendering. All the small details are still easily distinguishable in the picture which scores it a few more points leaving K850i behind with its blurred and light-struck photos. "
"..It’s easily recognized when you compare the pictures to those taken with a N95 – while the latter keeps the details sharp and colorful, the K850i gives a dull and blurry image. "
"...blaming Nokia handsets for taking unnaturally colored photos. The popularity of this belief is quite comparable to its wrongness. There might be something to it, by so far we’ve only encountered vivid and bright colours in N95 pictures but those by no means looked unreal or unnatural....So it turns out that actually it’s the SE phone that indulges in such a vice as unnatural color rendering – if not always, then at least in a good number of cases. While The N95 image post-processing algorithm does a good job making picture more bright and deep, the K850i tends to corrupt the photos in a way. "
"K850..abundance of yellow is but a corruption of its normally white lightning as seen in real life. N95 did the job quite well, the photos sporting a better detail and color depth"
|
Arne Anka
Joined: Nov 05, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden
PM |
On 2007-10-26 17:22:53, mib1800 wrote:
so what are you saying?? ... that the website purposely did it to make K850 pict looks worse.
No offence, but my comment has nothing to do with those pictures but rather with your malicious comment about the flash. It sounded as you wanted to imply he was an idiot not knowing what he is talking about, but obvious from his photographic skills shown in the link I provided he knows how to master his K850 and its flash as it seem (if the pictures are untuched as he claims).
What you fail to see is that while the K850 auto settings may not be the best (I admit the N95 can have a better auto system at times), with little manual fiddeling you can get excelent photos with K850 (perhaps even beter than those taken with N95).
That's all.
On 2007-10-26 17:22:48, Dextrr wrote:
LOL ... Kind people of Esato, plankgatan is now the Gold Standard for k850 pictures. All the reviews and comparisons done by 'PROFESSIONALS' on M-R, GSMarena and the many others to come don't mean a thing but what plankgatan says or do should be accepted without question. Way to go buddy! I want some of what you're somking!! lollz
Plankgatans may not be a professional, but he obviously has mastered his K850 very well while your "professionas" have not. You professionals have shown K850 takes less good pictures with auto settings while
the amature plankgatan has shown its possible to take excelent photos with K850 if you fiddle with the manual settings.
Now, what the heck is wrong with that if I may ask ?
[ This Message was edited by: Arne Anka on 2007-10-26 17:36 ] |
BobaFett
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
|
on that chinese sites are plenty of comparison pix... might sound weird, but after i zoomed on most of them, me seems, as the n95 pix were the ones made with k850 and the opposite... there si sg wrong with those pix, cant believe that n95 outperforms k850
|
AbuBasim
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
Ahh... nice! Yet one more thread where owners of mediocre camera phones flame each other about whose camera sucks the least 
|
mib1800
Joined: Mar 18, 2004
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2007-10-26 18:30:47, BobaFett wrote:
on that chinese sites are plenty of comparison pix... might sound weird, but after i zoomed on most of them, me seems, as the n95 pix were the ones made with k850 and the opposite... there si sg wrong with those pix, cant believe that n95 outperforms k850
are you so desperate? hehe..
There is no mix-up.  Take a look at the exif.
Arne Anka
It sounded as you wanted to imply he was an idiot not knowing what he is talking about, but obvious from his photographic skills shown in the link I provided he knows how to master his K850 and its flash as it seem (if the pictures are untuched as he claims).
Most of comparo photos are taken with auto. And there are many people who said that K850 flash does misfire or not fire at all.
Yeah, who knows...maybe plankgatan takes 10min to setup every shot he takes and he selects only the best after taking 50 shots of the same object. |
mario2004
Joined: Sep 16, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: South Africa
PM, WWW
|
You know what - actually I feel sorry for the SE 'fans'. They have a predicament now. Should they raise the alarm/complain and hope SE will do something about the picture quality (especially the flash) or should they 'save face' and praise SE for the beautiful camera flagship device they have created ?  judging by the posts, the later seems to be the case - suits me thou -
'Better govern our selfs the wrong way, then be governed by 'others' the right way.'
- Robert Mugabe - Freedom fighter comarade, peoples hero and President of Zimbabwe. |
SloopJohnB
Joined: Oct 28, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: the blue planet
PM |
N95 is already so much better than K850 in almost every aspect, the only thing that could save k850 was the camera. If the cam´s worst than that´s it. N95´s price is down nowadays and is a much better all round AND CAM phone compared to . Theres no reason to be a k850 or fan today, a couple of years ago (k700, w800 e etc) maybe, but today its just stupid. |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
i think N95 is one of the worst cell phones Nokia ever built.
realy expensive____bad build quality on the slide & chassis___ to much buggs____very bad battery life____no flash___the camera takes pictures with to much contrast____the GPS works often very bad, (special i cars..and yes, ive seen it).................so please, dont come and say that N95 is a awesome phone !!!!
sure...it have everything, but it should be nice if "everything" worked like it suppose to do !!!
_________________
I k850i, w810i & T28
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2007-10-26 19:37 ] |
mario2004
Joined: Sep 16, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: South Africa
PM, WWW
|
Here is another independent review were the N95 trashes the poor K850i in picture quality. http://www.phonearena.com/htm[....]K850-Review-review-r_1846.html In all the other aspects there is no contest anyway. I think we can safely assume the N95 - 8GiG is T H E P H O N E  |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
forgott one little thing...the screen on k850 is better/brighter....(looks better in strong sunshine to).
(so much for all this 16 millions colors...he he)
N95 is sooo ugly...i rather wait for N82..it looks much better.
_________________
I k850i, w810i & T28
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2007-10-26 19:39 ] |
DragonEye
Joined: Sep 26, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Canada
PM |
the is n73 vs. k790 all over again..
from my experience the k850 will be a more versatile cam.. due to size, speed and flash... the n95 will take better overall pics if you have time and the correct lighting...
but from what i heard the n95-8gig is a bit faster then the old n95 when it comes to capture...
Shaolinmonk on HOFO Official PHONE JUNKIE
My P1i Review
http://www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=152437&start=0 |
mario2004
Joined: Sep 16, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: South Africa
PM, WWW
|
On 2007-10-26 20:48:23, DragonEye wrote:
the is n73 vs. k790 all over again..
from my experience the k850 will be a more versatile cam.. due to size, speed and flash... the n95 will take better overall pics if you have time and the correct lighting...
but from what i heard the n95-8gig is a bit faster then the old n95 when it comes to capture...
And according to the reviews the K850i is slower then what we expect from SE. And NO this isn't N73 vs. K790 - This time around we have a clear winner
'Better govern our selfs the wrong way, then be governed by 'others' the right way.'
- Robert Mugabe - Freedom fighter comarade, peoples hero and President of Zimbabwe. |
dragon546
Joined: Sep 09, 2007
Posts: 92
From: Sutton, Surrey, UK
PM |
I would be interested if hey also did a comparaison with the LG KU990 vs N95 vs K850. If I sell my touch (still waiting to increase my post count before I can post) I would go for the either k850i or the LG.
Edit: I found the thread on the video thing
[ This Message was edited by: dragon546 on 2007-10-26 20:00 ] |
|
|
Posted: 2007-10-26 17:52
