| Author |
The Sony Ericsson cyber-shot thread |
KingBooker5
Joined: May 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: London, England
PM |
On 2007-08-03 21:40:22, tranced wrote:
On 2007-08-03 21:30:16, BobaFett wrote:
to be honest, i didnt recognised many differences between a w810 2mp pic and a k800 2 mp pic....
i did recon one: that the  810 is better
Why did you reckon that? |
|
|
tranced
Joined: Jan 19, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Santo Domingo, wonDeRland
PM |
On 2007-08-03 21:56:03, KingBooker5 wrote:
Why did you reckon that?
because it's true. i've seen a comparison between a k750 and a k550 and the k750 beat it.
|
Delta 9
Joined: Mar 26, 2003
Posts: 193
From: The Netherlands
PM |
I'm a but confused concerning the new K850. I mean was definitely going to get it but according to the review on mobile-review a successor is already in the making. With  going Nokia marketing-wise I don't know if I should wait or not. Up till last year I knew that when released a flagship model nothing in it's own line up would surpass it in the year after. Now I'm not so sure anymore (and inbuilt GPS would be sweet).
4000 Miles an hour in a jet-airplane...... GO OUT OF YOUR MIND GO INSANE!!!! |
KingBooker5
Joined: May 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: London, England
PM |
On 2007-08-03 21:58:19, tranced wrote:
On 2007-08-03 21:56:03, KingBooker5 wrote:
Why did you reckon that?
because it's true. i've seen a comparison between a k750 and a k550 and the k750 beat it.
but thats not between k800 and w810 |
BobaFett
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
|
i wasnt talking of xenon and photo flash, more of pix at daylight.
This message was posted from a E60-1 |
tranced
Joined: Jan 19, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Santo Domingo, wonDeRland
PM |
crap!!!??? what the hell i was thinking in!?
|
BobaFett
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
|
w810 and k750 have got the same cam, so trance is right
This message was posted from a E60-1 |
tranced
Joined: Jan 19, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Santo Domingo, wonDeRland
PM |
wait a minute!
boba said that he didnt recognized many differences between a k800's 2mp pic and a w810's 2mp pic. so i said that a w810 pic is better. then kingbooker asked me why. and i said that i saw a comparison between a k750(w810 camera's the same) and a k500 and the w810 beat it.
the problem was that i confused the k800 for the k550.
|
BobaFett
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
|
maybe there very light differences, but at the end the cs feature isnt that a big deal imo dont forget, these cam pix are ok for fun, so dont wait for real quality
This message was posted from a E60-1 |
QVGA
Joined: May 23, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pakistan
PM, WWW
|
agree with boba and tranc, K800 offers negligible improvement over K750 and K850 a negligable one over K800
|
goldenface
Joined: Dec 17, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Liverpool City Centre
PM |
Adding the Cyber-shot branding to the phones is a great move for SE, and yes, I have heard rumours of the K850i succesor being prepped right now.
I don't think there should be just one 2.0 mp camphone and one 3.2mp camphone and just one 5.0mp camphone in SE's range. I would like to see about 10 Cyber-shots eventually. 
The K810i shots are really impressive - some of the pics I have seen I would say are worthy of the Cyber-shot brand but I guess whether they are or not is ultimately up to Sony to decide.
|
PowerLee
Joined: Sep 22, 2005
Posts: 344
PM |
On 2007-08-03 21:27:23, NightBlade wrote:
A phone having the cyber-shot or walkman brand name on it adds class to it. Just having those characters engraved on the phone makes it special.
Just Imagine the following situation:
You meet your friend and you show him your new phone: "Hey, look what I got, a Sony Ericsson K810i Cyber-shot phone!"
"Like those cameras from Sony? Awesome, man. It surely takes some great pictures. Hey - 3.2MP. Cool! OMG, look at how shiny it is!" You end the conversation with an evil-ish smile and with a higher sense of self-esteem.
Class? Just because the manufacturer put a sticker on it?
Its all done to make money selling units because people fall for it because they suffer from badge snobbery, the product can be utter rubbish but because it has the right badge for the time people will flock like sheep to buy it.
Now K800I 3.2 mega pixel cyber shot phone & taking great pictures, can we really put those 2 together in the same sentence??? |
NightBlade
Joined: Jul 29, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Nessebar, Bulgaria
PM |
On 2007-08-03 22:52:11, PowerLee wrote:
Class? Just because the manufacturer put a sticker on it?
Now K800I 3.2 mega pixel cyber shot phone & taking great pictures, can we really put those 2 together in the same sentence???
Yes and yes. |
PowerLee
Joined: Sep 22, 2005
Posts: 344
PM |
Never rated the K800I as a good phone or camera let alone a worthwhile step up from a K750I, the K800I is over hyped in my opinion.
Class just because of a couple of pence worth of sticker? You must be joking!
[ This Message was edited by: PowerLee on 2007-08-03 22:17 ] |
BobaFett
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
|
i would say it has a cs technology for mob fones, but thats not the traditional cs
This message was posted from a E60-1 |
|
|
Posted: 2007-08-03 21:56
jay0726 | 
