| Author |
Nokia Spyshot! |
maggflodd
Joined: Apr 20, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: <500
PM |
On 2007-06-13 02:50:06, rambo47 wrote:
Hideous! For a company that is known for innovative design this represents about 10 giant steps backwards. It might have been cool some time around 1991.
... oh are you right!!! it's awful, and even in orange land that is a butt ugly colour!!!
[addsig] |
|
|
axxxr
Joined: Mar 21, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Londinium
PM, WWW
|
Nokia Announces the 6267
[addsig] |
kuancheek
Joined: Jul 03, 2007
Posts: 6
PM |
i think it juz a normal handphone..
not so intrested on it |
razec
Joined: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pearl of the Orient Seas
PM |
looks plasticky and not solid to me, not even a good match to the metallic look of the Z550
~19 years at Esato |
driftmania
Joined: Mar 07, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: California, USA
PM |
How could you say that? I bet you've never even held one. The specs are definitely 10x better than the Z550. |
razec
Joined: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pearl of the Orient Seas
PM |
On 2007-07-04 04:33:02, driftmania wrote:
How could you say that? I bet you've never even held one. The specs are definitely 10x better than the Z550.
first of all before you do your rebuttal to my previous post, i didn't even said that Z550's features are better than this nokia prototype. what am i talking about was the looks by which it doesn't look mettallic from the pictures compared to the solid looks of the Z550. and yeah i haven't held one, have you?  |
driftmania
Joined: Mar 07, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: California, USA
PM |
Never said I held one. And so what if the phone doesn't "look" solid? Nokia didn't make the phone look metallic because they didn't want to. |
razec
Joined: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pearl of the Orient Seas
PM |
On 2007-07-06 08:30:28, driftmania wrote:
Never said I held one. And so what if the phone doesn't "look" solid? Nokia didn't make the phone look metallic because they didn't want to.
sorry mate but i said that based on my opinion regarding to that phone, and suddenly you have contradicted with with different fact. my main point is all about the looks which is not metallic and you said it has 10x better specs than Z550. and that seems not a very good rebuttal to my post imho
i'm not starting a fan-fight here so i post this message to clear myself out of this staring-to-flame argument between you and me
~19 years at Esato |
|
|
Posted: 2007-06-13 10:16
