| Author |
Check this Nokia out |
Wyvern
Joined: Feb 12, 2003
Posts: 43
PM |
@orange
the z1010, the motorola a830, a835.
these dun have antennae |
|
|
vampyriaerotica
Joined: Jan 11, 2003
Posts: 341
From: MYS > London, UK
PM |
Look bloody ugly. None appeal. Looks like phone from early 90s especially with the disgusting antenna.
What? Nokia ran out of idea and design, you days are over! |
erikakerlund
Joined: Jan 08, 2003
Posts: 47
From: Sweden
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2002-11-13 08:22:00, orange wrote:
Quote:
|
On 2002-11-13 07:19, gsmwraith wrote:
WHat the hell is that sticking out of the top of it !!! An Antenna!!
|
|
How many 3G phones do you know, which don't have an antenna?? You can list those here.
|
|
How updated are you?! Don't forget the  Z1010!!! Has it got an antenna??? no....
[ This Message was edited by: erikakerlund on 2003-06-05 16:14 ] |
b-chill
Joined: Jun 05, 2003
Posts: 246
From: The Land of Confusion
PM, WWW
|
wich 3g phone does NOT have an antenna?
Yes.. It's the new SE z1010 in very asian-samsung-clamshell design. (link on the frontpage @ Estato |
bart
Joined: Feb 03, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Flanders
PM, WWW
|
a 3G phone is only a phone when it a has a camera for video calling. this nokia is not good! Z1010 and the upcomming motorola 3G are 3G phones. again nokia is bringing out junk whit an antenna |
b-chill
Joined: Jun 05, 2003
Posts: 246
From: The Land of Confusion
PM, WWW
|
It is also remarkable, that nokia forgot to implement a camera in front of the phone so you have to turn the phone around whenever you want to make a video call. It doesn't make any sense as you can't see who your talking too.. totally crappy.
But in ½ a year, I predict that nokia will come out with about 5 3g phones to beat the competitors. |
fijbert
Joined: Dec 26, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Montreal / Beirut
PM, WWW
|
ugh..
motorola?
I'd rather buy a nokia
at least those things dont just fall apart in ur hands!
motos break so easy it's not even funny..
my moto BT broke becuz it rained
what kept it to gether was a glue 
and the glue melted somehow!!!
Nobody is perfect, I am nobody, therefore I am perfect |
orange
Joined: Mar 13, 2002
Posts: 397
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2003-06-05 17:13:37, erikakerlund wrote:
How updated are you?! Don't forget the Z1010!!! Has it got an antenna??? no....
|
|
And if you didn't notice, my post was dated 13.11.2002, more than half an year ago. There wasn't such thing as z1010 introduced yet. |
caff
Joined: Jun 14, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Australia
PM |
Its the worst features 3G phone of all ! Only 4096 colour and no video conference call features.........since there's no video camera, only camera for taking pics at the back of the phone ! Pretty crap in terms of 3G phones !
|
orange
Joined: Mar 13, 2002
Posts: 397
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2003-06-05 17:34:21, bart wrote:
a 3G phone is only a phone when it a has a camera for video calling. this nokia is not good! Z1010 and the upcomming motorola 3G are 3G phones. again nokia is bringing out junk whit an antenna
|
|
And I thought that 3G definition is based on the network that the terminal uses, ie. WCDMA. I didn't know that it is based on camera for video calling. Stupid me... |
orange
Joined: Mar 13, 2002
Posts: 397
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2003-06-06 09:02:57, caff wrote:
Its the worst features 3G phone of all ! Only 4096 colour and no video conference call features.........since there's no video camera, only camera for taking pics at the back of the phone ! Pretty crap in terms of 3G phones !
|
|
Nokia 6650 has video camera... |
caff
Joined: Jun 14, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Australia
PM |
It has video camera for taking 15s short clips.........but no video conference as other 3G phones ! Since there's no camera on front of the phone.............pretty useless 3G phone from nokia !
|
orange
Joined: Mar 13, 2002
Posts: 397
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2003-06-06 13:02:29, caff wrote:
It has video camera for taking 15s short clips.........but no video conference as other 3G phones ! Since there's no camera on front of the phone.............pretty useless 3G phone from nokia !
|
|
See my second post (to Bart) in this page...
[ This Message was edited by: orange on 2003-06-06 12:13 ] |
Knut.G.
Joined: Mar 12, 2002
Posts: 149
PM |
I have mentioned this phone before, and I have to repeat myself, what a lacklustre showing by Nokia.
Hell, even SE waked up and smelled the coffee when they released the Z1010, by far the most interesting 3G phone to date(too bad about the size though, but that goes for all 3G handsets).
And 380 kbps?? Is that really 3G speeds? I thought EDGE could handle that over normal networks?
Either way, I think Nokia may have gone too far when their marketing department got bigger than their R&D department, and that shows now with their latest phone releases.
-Knut |
Super G
Joined: Mar 07, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: France
PM |
Well at least some companies are more ahead technically than some others...
http://press.nokia.com/PR/200306/907555_5.html
Also SE didn't have a working version of their 3G Zwhatever in CeBit... Just a plastic one with plastic stickers for the screen. Waw. Or at least they said they had a working one, but then where was it?? Hmm
Besides, I'd like to point out that SE is still lacking any EDGE handset while Nokia already have two...
Anyway, I can agree that 6650 looks aren't the best around (euphemism), but I guess it's likely not targetted to a mass market, more to some selected users from operators i.e. friendly users or so. So who cares about the looks. The technology need to be proven first, then let's see what will happen 
|
|
|
Posted: 2003-06-05 16:23
