| Author |
Nokia 6280 or K800 |
QVGA
Joined: May 23, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pakistan
PM, WWW
|
Quote:
|
On 2006-06-27 16:14:01, goldenface wrote:
But it already has a swivel, a slider and a slim candybar as well as a slew of clams.
Whats left to do? The v3 is for people that don't know any better.
|
|
But they are walkman ones. My dad isnt going to be running around with a phone intended for youngsters. He's 55! | |
|
BobaFett
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
|
think its better when the buyer tests both at usage and then decides. our experiences are individual on every area, i used 6280, it was accepteable. k800 is not interesting for me, netx to the 3.2 mp cam nothing special to offer after the former models, imo.
|
Minstrel_Man
Joined: Sep 03, 2002
Posts: 264
From: Manchester
PM, WWW
|
Oh I dunno, stick a bit of jive bunny on there he might enjoy it (sorry Jive bunny was the only thing that i could think of lol) |
QVGA
Joined: May 23, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pakistan
PM, WWW
|
Quote:
|
On 2006-06-27 16:18:37, BobaFett wrote:
think its better when the buyer tests both at usage and then decides. our experiences are individual on every area, i used 6280, it was accepteable. k800 is not interesting for me, netx to the 3.2 mp cam nothing special to offer after the former models, imo.
|
|
Agreed. k700>k750>k800
The only emphasis was on the camera, and not on the phone it self. And k800 better have good built quality |
Minstrel_Man
Joined: Sep 03, 2002
Posts: 264
From: Manchester
PM, WWW
|
Quote:
|
On 2006-06-27 16:18:37, BobaFett wrote:
think its better when the buyer tests both at usage and then decides. our experiences are individual on every area, i used 6280, it was accepteable. k800 is not interesting for me, netx to the 3.2 mp cam nothing special to offer after the former models, imo.
|
|
Sounds like your awaiting the next evolutionary leap in mobile phones, although you have a cam, media player, wifi etc etc... apart from streaming tv what else can you think of thats gonna take phones to the next level?
until that time, you can only improve on existing models. |
QVGA
Joined: May 23, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pakistan
PM, WWW
|
Quote:
|
On 2006-06-27 16:22:10, Minstrel_Man wrote:
Quote:
|
On 2006-06-27 16:18:37, BobaFett wrote:
think its better when the buyer tests both at usage and then decides. our experiences are individual on every area, i used 6280, it was accepteable. k800 is not interesting for me, netx to the 3.2 mp cam nothing special to offer after the former models, imo.
|
|
Sounds like your awaiting the next evolutionary leap in mobile phones, although you have a cam, media player, wifi etc etc... apart from streaming tv what else can you think of thats gonna take phones to the next level?
until that time, you can only improve on existing models.
|
|
How about a symbian? And not those P and M series. Something thats easy to use like a 7610 and 6630. |
BobaFett
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
|
dont know what future gonna bring us, my opinion is based on the present features of fones, like this topic to 6280 vs k800
|
goldenface
Joined: Dec 17, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Liverpool City Centre
PM |
@QVGA.
The K610i is straight to the point, slim, no-nonsense, expandable mem. No Walkman, no Cybershot no gimmicks.... |
Minstrel_Man
Joined: Sep 03, 2002
Posts: 264
From: Manchester
PM, WWW
|
Quote:
|
On 2006-06-27 16:24:04, QVGA wrote:
Quote:
|
On 2006-06-27 16:22:10, Minstrel_Man wrote:
Quote:
|
On 2006-06-27 16:18:37, BobaFett wrote:
think its better when the buyer tests both at usage and then decides. our experiences are individual on every area, i used 6280, it was accepteable. k800 is not interesting for me, netx to the 3.2 mp cam nothing special to offer after the former models, imo.
|
|
Sounds like your awaiting the next evolutionary leap in mobile phones, although you have a cam, media player, wifi etc etc... apart from streaming tv what else can you think of thats gonna take phones to the next level?
until that time, you can only improve on existing models.
|
|
How about a symbian? And not those P and M series. Something thats easy to use like a 7610 and 6630.
|
|
What was difficult to use about the P series? (cant comment on the M series) |
BobaFett
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
|
if u believe me or no, one of the most disturbing thing is - at least for me - that cyber shot text on k800. it just ruins the cover, its still a fone, not a digicam.
|
QVGA
Joined: May 23, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pakistan
PM, WWW
|
Quote:
|
On 2006-06-27 16:27:23, Minstrel_Man wrote:
Quote:
|
On 2006-06-27 16:24:04, QVGA wrote:
Quote:
|
On 2006-06-27 16:22:10, Minstrel_Man wrote:
Quote:
|
On 2006-06-27 16:18:37, BobaFett wrote:
think its better when the buyer tests both at usage and then decides. our experiences are individual on every area, i used 6280, it was accepteable. k800 is not interesting for me, netx to the 3.2 mp cam nothing special to offer after the former models, imo.
|
|
Sounds like your awaiting the next evolutionary leap in mobile phones, although you have a cam, media player, wifi etc etc... apart from streaming tv what else can you think of thats gonna take phones to the next level?
until that time, you can only improve on existing models.
|
|
How about a symbian? And not those P and M series. Something thats easy to use like a 7610 and 6630.
|
|
What was difficult to use about the P series? (cant comment on the M series)
|
|
I wouldnt call it simple. But they fall in a completely different category. And they're expensive. I'm talking about something like a k800 with symbian.
But there's gotta be a logic behind the fact that nokia has a lot of java based phones but SE has about 3 symbian ones. |
goldenface
Joined: Dec 17, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Liverpool City Centre
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2006-06-27 15:43:04, draperm2525 wrote:
I av a k700i and i want a new phone, which is better? Nokia 6280 or K800
This message was posted from a K700i
|
|
Why do you need to choose a new phone? Will you need a smartphone (6280)?
Will you use the cam in the K800i?
If you just want to upgrade to better handset then the K800i will be newer and cooler. |
Minstrel_Man
Joined: Sep 03, 2002
Posts: 264
From: Manchester
PM, WWW
|
true, but "cyber shot" is a brand name, its associated with high quality pictures, for people who dont go into the details of phone specs you can look at the phone and instantly see its got a high quality built in camera, ok its not meant to be a digi cam, but this is what im saying about improving upon previous models until the next evolutionary jump in technology.
Whats your average joe gonna buy? a high quality mp3 player, a high quality phone and a high quality camera or a combined version of these with a memory stick, for around 1/3rd of the price? |
BobaFett
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
|
and k800 has such a small display, i like big displays, like 6680, n70.
|
QVGA
Joined: May 23, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pakistan
PM, WWW
|
Quote:
|
On 2006-06-27 16:32:10, Minstrel_Man wrote:
true, but "cyber shot" is a brand name, its associated with high quality pictures, for people who dont go into the details of phone specs you can look at the phone and instantly see its got a high quality built in camera, ok its not meant to be a digi cam, but this is what im saying about improving upon previous models until the next evolutionary jump in technology.
Whats your average joe gonna buy? a high quality mp3 player, a high quality phone and a high quality camera or a combined version of these with a memory stick, for around 1/3rd of the price?
|
|
High quality cameras dont have crap like best pic. Seriously, are kids their target audience? Give some ISO and shutter speed options like samsungs have. | |
|
Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi
|
Posted: 2006-06-27 16:17
