| Author |
New Nokia 3g 6650 phone + Bt Headset |
Froddan
Joined: Jan 18, 2002
Posts: > 500
PM |
On these small screens, there isn't that much use for more colors than 4096. You can view a perfect picture with those colors on a small screen.
Of course it's not bad to have 65 000 colors, but the diff between 65 000 and 4096 is less than between 4096 and 256. |
|
|
yapliren
Joined: Apr 27, 2002
Posts: 82
From: Malaysia
PM |
the diff between 65 000 and 4096 is alot ! It is more then 60904. But the different between 4096 and 256 is just 3840 colors.
stupid nokia phone with useless antena ! |
riflogic
Joined: Jun 17, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: London,UK
PM |
Same old Nokia. How can that be a 3G handset. It look s**t and that its from the old days of mobile phones. Nokia will never learn; and even stupider people are going to buy them |
Froddan
Joined: Jan 18, 2002
Posts: > 500
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2002-09-26 20:51, yapliren wrote:
the diff between 65 000 and 4096 is alot ! It is more then 60904. But the different between 4096 and 256 is just 3840 colors.
|
|
And I meant the way a picture, on a 35x35mm screen looks like with different amount of colors.
On a 256 color screen, you can barely see what the pic is about.
On a 4096 color screen, it shows very clear.
On a 65 000 color screen, it's even better.
The diff in viewing is bigger if you take a step from 256 to a 4096 color screen, than if you upgrade from 4096 to 65 000.
Did this clear things out? |
|
|
Posted: 2002-09-26 19:53
