Author |
K300 vs 3220 |
dancingfate Joined: Sep 25, 2004 Posts: > 500 From: Jakarta, Indonesia PM |
K300 has the comfortable keypad and it looks better than 3220.
Don't make a comparison between K300 and T610, it isn't fair, cuz the two phones are in the different level.
Apple iPhone 4, HTC Evo 3D, HTC Sensation, HTC Inspire 4G, HTC Desire S, HTC Wildfire, S001, SO905iCS, T650 (Gold & Green), C901, W800, K660, K700, Beibei (G702), Severine (DEAD) |
|
mongoose3800 Joined: Nov 29, 2005 Posts: 416 From: Australia PM |
Quote:
|
On 2006-03-14 13:46:44, shivam007 wrote:
And ladies and gentlemen we have a clear winner and that's ................................................... Nokia 3220
This message was posted from a Nokia
|
|
You must be joking! I bought my son a k300 for his B'day. The K300 is really great value for a low end phone. Better than the 3220 IMO. The Nokia only has 4mb memory available to user (k300 has nearly 10mb available), No MP3 on Nokia, No IRDA on Nokia, No Java support, no voice dialing and shorter talk time. K300s familiar SE O/S is far nicer than Nokia's old clumsy OS as well. The better phone with better features is quite clearly the K300. |
Muga Joined: Sep 09, 2005 Posts: 33 From: Jamaica PM |
Get the K300i its great
This message was posted from a T610 |
QVGA Joined: May 23, 2006 Posts: > 500 From: Pakistan PM, WWW
|
Quote:
|
On 2006-09-03 17:39:43, Muga wrote:
Get the K300i its great
This message was posted from a T610
|
|
You dont think he would have gotten it by now? |
spikeyjac Joined: May 30, 2006 Posts: > 500 From: west yorkshire! Mobile: w890i PM |
i have had both and personally i wuld say i luved the 3220 more than the k300 |
AGIstYLe Joined: Jul 26, 2006 Posts: 3 PM |
I used my k300i before,what I feel the pros are the speaker,it produce great sound quality,it also support many music format like m4a,aac and wav.Some high class phone in other model also don't support.k300i is the winner at any low-class phone model>> |
|
Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi
|