Esato

Forum > Sony Ericsson / Sony > Accessories > AAC Plus

Previous  12
Author AAC Plus
max_wedge
Xperia Neo Black
Joined: Aug 29, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Australia
PM, WWW
Posted: 2005-10-29 13:14
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
exactly so. A hardware implementation was too costly for W800 when under development, and a firmware solution now would require a complete rewrite, since the mediaplayer only plays the data output from the on chip decoders. The firmware has no encoder/decoder from my understanding. (someone please correct me if wrong)

W900 has the hardware, so no doubt SE music phones will all support AAC+ from now.
dreams
W800
Joined: Oct 27, 2005
Posts: 80
PM, WWW
Posted: 2005-10-30 00:14
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
I was thinking they could just alter the firmware to do whatever they want with what they have.

Just like a PC with the same hardwares but being able to play different codecs that are introduce in the future.
max_wedge
Xperia Neo Black
Joined: Aug 29, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Australia
PM, WWW
Posted: 2005-10-30 02:26
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
yes, but to alter the firmware in that way would involve rewriting the firmware completely, not just adding a minor piece of code. Without a hardware chip for aac+ decoding, the W800 hardware is probably too slow and has not enough memory to run a software decoder in firmware alone.

Believe me, what you are asking, is not a simple task. It probably can't be done without changing the hardware as well as the firmware anyway. Even if it could, it would be thousands of hours of coding and testing to add a feature that's available in the W900 anyway.

Like some other guy just said, let's get the current firmware right first
blu_6779
T310
Joined: Aug 27, 2004
Posts: 193
From: U.N.C.L.E.
PM, WWW
Posted: 2005-10-30 05:38
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
the dbpoweramp plugin is crap. Sound of cymbals is very flat at highest encoding setting of 64 kbit/s stereo.


Edit: I stand corrected. Winamp 5.1 can't seem to play it right, playing it at 22 kHz, but plays excellent on wmp with the coreaac library at 44 kHz. Definitely smaller and better than mp3 .
_________________
Si hoc non legere potes tu asinus es.
Gendou(^-^)

[ This Message was edited by: blu_6779 on 2005-10-30 05:10 ]
dreams
W800
Joined: Oct 27, 2005
Posts: 80
PM, WWW
Posted: 2005-10-30 07:24
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
What I see from the internet.. MP3 is still widely most common format.
hotcha
P900
Joined: Apr 08, 2005
Posts: 93
From: bristol
PM
Posted: 2005-10-30 23:01
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
The new winamp is all buggery and such. Try MPC
dreams
W800
Joined: Oct 27, 2005
Posts: 80
PM, WWW
Posted: 2005-11-03 15:48
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Foobar2000.org rocks.
Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi