Esato

Forum > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > Is it worthwhile me selling my 3mp CyberShot and using K750i/W800 instead?

Previous  123  Next
Author Is it worthwhile me selling my 3mp CyberShot and using K750i/W800 instead?
Edridge
K750
Joined: Jun 26, 2005
Posts: 57
PM
Posted: 2005-09-06 15:21
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
cybershots take good pics.... you could just buy a better batt for it... but its still up to you...
etaab
Nokia N8
Joined: Jan 23, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: UK - South Yorkshire
PM
Posted: 2005-09-07 00:38
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
I'd sell the camera.

Sure, the K750i/W800i do not take the ultimate 2mp pictures compared to some cameras, but theres one thing worth mentioning..

All the time larger megapixel cameras are coming out, replacing cameras like your 3.2mp Cybershot. It might be worth selling the Cybershot NOW whilst you still can, or whilst you can still get a decent price for it.

Leave it much longer and nobody in their right mind would give you more than a few quid for it.
Check me out on Instagram ! search for etaab !
masseur
P910
Joined: Jan 03, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Sydney, London
PM
Posted: 2005-09-07 00:39
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
I've kept my DSC-T1. It takes 5MP pictures but I regularly vary it from VGA to 5MP depending on my needs and as good a pictures as my K750 takes, I don't have the same versatility as the cybershot
X-Ter
W890 Brown
Joined: Jul 19, 2004
Posts: 49
PM
Posted: 2005-09-07 07:41
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
I have the P7 and a W800, if you wanted I could take two comparison pics if you wanted, but the digital camera will probably be better anyway.
ares
P1
Joined: Dec 11, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Coimbra, Portugal
PM
Posted: 2005-09-07 10:30
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Quote:
My very old Fuji 1.5MP camera produces far, far better pictures than the K750i's 2MP camera.




this made me laught.

look...i had a Sony P30 1,3 mp camera...i won photo prizes with...now, if i compare daylight photos from k750 and photos from the P30, well, i have to say k750 photos are not worse if not better

http://www.pbase.com/ares/sony_p30

http://www.pbase.com/ares/se_k750i

and sometimes they are also on par with my fuji s5000

k750 photos are on par with point&shoot cameras, in daylight photography...but they loose in 2 situations - when you need optical zoom, and when you donīt have much light

That new 3mp sharp has this problems solved, but in other hand itīs a big brick of a phone

[ This Message was edited by: Arez on 2005-09-07 09:33 ]
JAGUY85
Xperia X10 Black
Joined: Oct 17, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Jamaica
PM
Posted: 2005-09-08 22:11
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
But the K750 has a flash accessory that performs well.

This message was posted from a Nokia

dts-phile
W900 black
Joined: Dec 04, 2004
Posts: 189
PM, WWW
Posted: 2005-09-08 22:58
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
... and the k750 is far better than Sharp! The only poisitve point for this phone is that it captures breathtaking MP4 videos (and big, big!). But they are condemned to stay in the phone: no compatibility and file size...
DTS-PHILE (Nice, France)
The DTS Surround Sound Passion
http://www.dts-phile.com
rabmag
T68 gold
Joined: Sep 05, 2005
Posts: 6
PM
Posted: 2005-09-09 00:54
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
As previous posters have stated, it's got more to do with the optics than anything else. The fact that it's a CMOS sensor doesn't really mean much. To me, the lens matters most.


This picture was taken with a CMOS camera...I ain't complaining.

http://www.pbase.com/drrusa/image/34642139.jpg
max_wedge
Xperia Neo Black
Joined: Aug 29, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Australia
PM, WWW
Posted: 2005-09-09 17:14
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
I sold my CX4200 2MP camera. It shipped with auto-focus and glass lense. It took quite good pics for a 2MP camera. The inbuilt flash was okay but only really good for fill-in.

The K750 is also 2MP and auto-focus (but plastic lense). It's pictures are easily as good as the Kodak. The K750 light is stronger than the Kodak's flash.

The Kodak however had the edge in low light due to having less noise. The K750 however has the advantage of the stronger light that can sometimes overcome a lowlight condition.

Over-all, I don't miss the CX4200. The K750 is close enough to the CX4200 in performance that I'd rarely have needed the CX4200.

If it was a 3MP, I don't think it would've changed much. If it had had an optical zoom though, I'd have been tempted to keep it.

Arez's points about optical zoom and K750's weakness in low light are spot on.
s3r6iu
P900 no flip
Joined: May 20, 2005
Posts: 40
From: Tg.Mures Romania
PM
Posted: 2005-09-10 20:08
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
if you really wan't a phone and a camera i think that you should try a N series phone from nokia. N series lentills are from karl zeiss the german cameras manufacturer (of course they are made it from glass not plastic like others phone cameras )
max_wedge
Xperia Neo Black
Joined: Aug 29, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Australia
PM, WWW
Posted: 2005-09-11 04:38
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
actually despite the glass lense, the N series camera's seem to be about the same quality as K750 pictures. The N90 pictures are slightly less clear with slightly poorer colour/exposure.

Video quality is better however.
pccchurch
T68 gold
Joined: Aug 31, 2005
Posts: 1
PM
Posted: 2005-09-11 09:56
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Quote:

On 2005-09-09 00:54:27, rabmag wrote:
As previous posters have stated, it's got more to do with the optics than anything else. The fact that it's a CMOS sensor doesn't really mean much. To me, the lens matters most.


This picture was taken with a CMOS camera...I ain't complaining.

http://www.pbase.com/drrusa/image/34642139.jpg



Wow, Daniel Rodriguez, you look like a dog. Wow!

[ This Message was edited by: pccchurch on 2005-09-11 08:57 ]
s3r6iu
P900 no flip
Joined: May 20, 2005
Posts: 40
From: Tg.Mures Romania
PM
Posted: 2005-09-14 03:27
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
you have that right max...the picture quality of se k750i and w800 are much better...the N series pictures are not so real like k750i.
Today i have seen a picture taken with k750i on a kodak paper(9/13 cm ) and i tell you that is superb
MWEB
Xperia X10 Black
Joined: Feb 13, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: somewhere nicer than you
PM
Posted: 2005-09-14 15:54
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
I had a k750i and compared it with a cybershot u20 (base miniature digicam) and the pics where nowhere near as good. A phone is for making and receiving calls on, a digicam is for taking pics with!! it really is that simple.
cloysterpete5
K750
Joined: May 27, 2005
Posts: 167
From: Whitby, North Yorkshire, Engla
PM
Posted: 2005-09-14 16:27
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
I solf my 5MP Sony Cybershot to my younger brother, sure it too much better pics but I hardly ever used it because I never ever had it with me, just couldn't be bothered taking it anywhere. In a couple of days with the K750i I had already taken more pics with it than I ever did with the cybershot. Pic quality of the K750i is fine, unless you are real serious about photography.

I'm just anticipating 2012 when I can take my new SE phone with X20 optical zoom and proper 10mp burst mode and get some decent shots of the London Olympics.
Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi