| Author |
SONY Xperia Rumors 2013 Edition |
xperia_aio
Joined: Jun 21, 2013
Posts: 31
PM |
On 2013-07-14 14:37:14, randomuser wrote:
The sensor size is 2/3". No doubt about that. 
@ramu
what about the focal length? have you heard anything about it? 28mm?
|
|
|
randomuser
Joined: Sep 13, 2011
Posts: > 500
PM |
Yes 28mm equivalent |
hacker113
Joined: Jul 14, 2013
Posts: 3
PM |
@randomuser
Ok, according to your information, there is a mistake in the EXIF data and real focal length is about 7.12mm, near the 8.02mm of 808 and more than 1020 (26/3.93=6.62mm), which is a very good thing for bokeh!
|
randomuser
Joined: Sep 13, 2011
Posts: > 500
PM |
Yes since it's a prototype the EXIF info must have been screwed up intentionally.
Anyway here's XR5 data on camera
20.2 MP Exmor R back illuminated 2/3" Sensor
28mm equiv f2.0 Sony G Lens
Super SteadyShot Image Stabilization
ISO 50-12800
Xenon Flash + LED Flash for video
Manual controls
BIONZ ISP
Optional add on lenses and accessories
Multitude of picture settings similar to 2013 Sony cybershot range cameras
@MartenR
To say that the Honami will "come close" to 1020 camera performance is an understatement to say the very least. 
[ This Message was edited by: randomuser on 2013-07-14 15:18 ] |
xperia_aio
Joined: Jun 21, 2013
Posts: 31
PM |
On 2013-07-14 15:59:16, randomuser wrote:
Yes since it's a prototype the EXIF info must have been screwed up intentionally.
Anyway here's XR5 data on camera
20.2 MP Exmor R back illuminated 2/3" Sensor
28mm equiv f2.0 Sony G Lens
Super SteadyShot Image Stabilization
Xenon Flash + LED Flash for video
Manual controls
[ This Message was edited by: randomuser on 2013-07-14 15:00 ]
@ramu
You just made my day man!!! i could kiss you!! 
|
jianlin
Joined: Oct 17, 2012
Posts: 489
PM |
[quote]
Xenon Flash + LED Flash for video
so confirm xenon + led flash in honami? great! |
randomuser
Joined: Sep 13, 2011
Posts: > 500
PM |
BTW @Razec
You still haven't answered reeflotz and Shotokan's Question |
smclion102
Joined: Aug 12, 2010
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2013-07-14 16:03:20, xperia_aio wrote:
On 2013-07-14 15:59:16, randomuser wrote:
Yes since it's a prototype the EXIF info must have been screwed up intentionally.
Anyway here's XR5 data on camera
20.2 MP Exmor R back illuminated 2/3" Sensor
28mm equiv f2.0 Sony G Lens
Super SteadyShot Image Stabilization
Xenon Flash + LED Flash for video
Manual controls
[ This Message was edited by: randomuser on 2013-07-14 15:00 ]
@ramu
You just made my day man!!! i could kiss you!!
If you're a girl he would take it 
T610i-K700i-K750i-W700i-W810i-W560i-P1i-W910i-G900i-W595i-X10mini-Cedar-Xperia U-Xperia S-XZ Premimum |
XperiaJunkie
Joined: Dec 13, 2012
Posts: > 500
From: Parts Unknown
PM, WWW
|
@randomuser what about the Bionz image chip and is the super steady shot the same as HHT?
I'm so happy 'cause today
I've found my friends ...
They're in my head
|
randomuser
Joined: Sep 13, 2011
Posts: > 500
PM |
BIONZ is there yes. Fixed my post
SuperSteadyShot is Image Stabilization tech nothing to do with Handheld Twilight. In Sensor Image stabilization as compared to Optical Image Stabilization in HTC One and Lumia 920,1020 |
smclion102
Joined: Aug 12, 2010
Posts: > 500
PM |
http://news.cnet.com/8301-103[....]e-in-europe-as-android-surges/
T610i-K700i-K750i-W700i-W810i-W560i-P1i-W910i-G900i-W595i-X10mini-Cedar-Xperia U-Xperia S-XZ Premimum |
milukugiuniu
Joined: Oct 16, 2012
Posts: 291
PM |
^^ It was posted long time ago. |
sami92a
Joined: Dec 11, 2012
Posts: 423
From: Sweden
PM |
so Xenon is confirmed again? i thought that Xenon was confirmed NOT to be in Honami a couple of weeks ago... this is confusing to say the very least |
razec
Joined: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Mars
PM |
@reeflotz, shotokan-san, what I reviewed were actually lowlight samples from Honami's camera
Lowlight shots show lots of details with minimal noise up until ISO400, kinda reminds me of C901 lowlight shots to be honest, ISO800 is grainy throughout the image but there is a small decrease in overall detail compared with the ISO400. The ISO1600 sample on the other hand is very noisy and has green tint on it but I think meddling with photoshop denoising + image downsampling to 5MP can make it usable enough, I'm not expecting the camera to be as good as RX100 at this ISO value at all. I can't comment on the overall color fidelity yet due to the nature of the subject that was captured, but it does renders the red channel vividly, something we're used to see among high end sony compact cameras since the HX9v. as for lens quality, as I said there were some corner softness on the image frame but i found the sharpness at center remarkable, It's much sharper than what the XZ(using original XZ camera driver) could achieve. I believe this is due to the new higher quality G-lens Honami is rumored to come equipped with.
once again, please note that the samples I had were taken from a preproduction software, quality may still be subjected for improvements at launch. this is what I can only share with you guys as I'm not allowed to reveal anything more than that, again the issue of whether you guys would trust me or not lies on your personal judgment
To add another thoughts, I think the decision to choose IBIS over OIS as the mechanical stabilization tech for Honami stems from the fact that it will come with 3rd party lens accessories. as equipping OIS on the third party lens would be very costly, both for lens makers and consumers, not to mention that it will require additional circuitry to enable the device to drive the IS motor on the lens which in turn would make it larger. also another advantage of IBIS apart from the fact that it can stabilize any lens is that it can also stabilize fast lens, as there is no DSLR lens faster than F2.8 that has built in OIS.
[ This Message was edited by: razec on 2013-07-14 16:06 ] 10 years at Esato |
Ricky D
Joined: Feb 05, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK (living in Beijing)
PM, WWW
|
@sami92a (and anyone else confused by conflicting info)
NOTHING is confirmed until the device is announced.
The fact that our some so called insiders are changing the information they provide on a weekly basis should show the reliability of what are essentially rumours (note thread topic).
Certain members here provide information (usually in small doses every couple months) and don't change their story, some other members post a lot of info and it changes every week. I'm not saying either's sources are lying, I'm certain people post what they think to be right at the time but certainly some members can be taken more seriously and others need more salt.
I have a dig bick
You read that wrong |
|
|
Posted: 2013-07-14 15:26
