| Author |
C905 CamDriver Modded |
Bryan84
Joined: Mar 28, 2007
Posts: 334
PM, WWW
|
On 2009-09-25 04:37:29, fangdue wrote:
Welcome to Easto! 
nice first shot!
My Personal Homepage
http://www.bryanchung.sg |
|
|
fangdue
Joined: Sep 23, 2009
Posts: 66
PM |
C905 from Vietnam 
|
fangdue
Joined: Sep 23, 2009
Posts: 66
PM |
@Bryan84: thx so much! |
eltoffer
Joined: Nov 01, 2007
Posts: 348
PM |
a taste of my new driver, the flash shots are ready, no more yellowness corners for sure ^^ and real colors not so vivid tomorrow morning will test outdoor shots (no flash) and also portrait shots, be patient this will be so far the best driver i could ever made and also the very last one
cheers
[ This Message was edited by: eltoffer on 2009-09-25 10:16 ] |
tsuick
Joined: Sep 10, 2009
Posts: 6
PM |
Would anyone tell me which driver can support CIF video recording?
I am now using the cybershot experience driver and found it very good.
I want to taste the eltofer and DM driver as well but I am not familiar with their specification.
would anyone tell me >< thanks!
here is my some test photos
 |
igica11
Joined: Mar 26, 2009
Posts: 19
PM |
I suggest DM that he little edit his quantization table from:
jpeg_qtable_0=
01 01 01 01 01 02 03 03
01 01 01 01 01 03 03 03
01 01 01 01 02 03 03 03
01 01 01 01 02 04 04 03
01 01 03 04 04 06 06 04
01 02 03 03 04 05 06 05
02 03 04 04 05 06 06 05
05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05;
jpeg_qtable_1=
01 01 02 04 06 11 11 11
01 01 02 04 08 11 11 11
02 02 03 04 11 11 11 11
04 04 04 05 11 11 11 11
06 08 11 11 11 11 11 11
11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11
11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11
11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11;
to:
jpeg_qtable_0=
04 01 01 01 01 02 03 03
01 01 01 01 01 03 03 03
01 01 01 01 02 03 03 03
01 01 01 01 02 04 04 03
01 01 03 04 04 06 06 04
01 02 03 03 04 05 06 05
02 03 04 04 05 06 06 05
05 05 05 05 05 05 05 05;
jpeg_qtable_1=
04 01 02 04 06 11 11 11
01 01 02 04 08 11 11 11
02 02 03 04 11 11 11 11
04 04 04 05 11 11 11 11
06 08 11 11 11 11 11 11
11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11
11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11
11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11;
The first place in the upper left corner is very important number. It represents the average, or mean value. So if the whole block is dark brown or light red on average, this place says so. I get some artiffact when using original DM driver
see example:
http://www.mediafire.com/?dgmzj5nzmzm
grass looks unnatural
I will use higher number in the first place in the upper left corner and see if results would bee better
|
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
the question is: what for?
please explain because in my opinion these tables do nothing, however if I'm wrong I would like to see anything what can convince me that I'm wrong
|
igica11
Joined: Mar 26, 2009
Posts: 19
PM |
OK try this, use one photo (XY for example) and open it in adobe photoshop. Than use function save as and use quality 11 and save it as XYa. Then once again open XY photo and save as XYb with quality for example 7. Then compare photo XYa with XYb. You probably wont see any obvios difference (except file size) but you cannot say there is no difference. Adobe photoshop use for different quality settings different quantization tables, more on: http://www.impulseadventure.com/photo/jpeg-quantization.html
[ This Message was edited by: igica11 on 2009-09-25 16:14 ] |
mikely_28
Joined: Mar 15, 2009
Posts: 466
From: Poland
PM |
DM 3.5
macro
|
eltoffer
Joined: Nov 01, 2007
Posts: 348
PM |
@raiderski
you are right i tested it yesterday and it does NOTHING no matter what values you use, but let them keep dreaming ^^ anyway if they think it is better, doesnt affect you at all
|
masada1971
Joined: Jun 05, 2008
Posts: > 500
PM |
eltoffer still waiting for your new driver... |
jake20
Joined: Jan 23, 2009
Posts: > 500
From: USA
PM |
I am trying to decide whether to buy a C905 or not.
I am concerned about all of the reports of bad build quality with broken earpieces..
Is this phone durable? and do you guys truly feel it is a replacement for a digital camera?
thanks for the help!
[ This Message was edited by: jake20 on 2009-09-25 16:42 ] |
masada1971
Joined: Jun 05, 2008
Posts: > 500
PM |
if you get one with no problems,it sure is a replacement of your digicam in terms of photography..see the results for yourself in previous pages...or you can still wait few days for Satio, which would be even better in all aspects... 
[ This Message was edited by: masada1971 on 2009-09-25 16:49 ] |
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
igica11
basically I agree, but you cannot compare Adobe PS to  compression. PS uses constant qtables for various levels of compression while uses variable (or adaptive) compression which means no constant qtables. qtable for every single picture taken is calculated from parameters like min, avg, max file size and min, avg, max quality. you can easily find them in code. DM used very high values in these parameters, that's why jpegs have a lot of MB and big % of quality
mikely
very nice set
|
mikely_28
Joined: Mar 15, 2009
Posts: 466
From: Poland
PM |
DM 3.5
macro
|
|
|
Posted: 2009-09-25 04:41
