| Author |
Xperia arc discussion Thread |
goldenface
Joined: Dec 17, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Liverpool City Centre
PM |
It really does look like SE has put a lot of work into making sure the arc is a vast improvement on the X10. It's all looking good so far.
|
|
|
Arne Anka
Joined: Nov 05, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden
PM |
On 2011-01-07 13:55:44, Posselwhite wrote:
It's a TFT screen.
TFT is one form of LCD.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TFT_LCD
[ This Message was edited by: Arne Anka on 2011-01-07 14:12 ] |
smclion102
Joined: Aug 12, 2010
Posts: > 500
PM |
I am in love with ARC and the UI is amazing its soo fast looks soo neat the media looks is soo sexy.
Now they better launch ARC very soon.For sure ARC will sell more than X10  Phone is sexy + it has 2.3 should be the second phone with new os. |
Arne Anka
Joined: Nov 05, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden
PM |
Yet another clip made by the german site BestBoyz representative at CES showing Arc running 2.4.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3p8nRoGz918&feature=player_embedded
SE confirms upgrade of Arc to Honeycomb.
We will upgrade the Xperia Arc to Honeycomb,” Vautier confirmed at the launch briefing for the new Gingerbread-powered phone
[ This Message was edited by: Arne Anka on 2011-01-07 14:29 ] |
juris15
Joined: Jul 19, 2008
Posts: 289
From: Philippines
PM, WWW
|
I thought honeycomb is only for tablets? |
Arne Anka
Joined: Nov 05, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden
PM |
Apperently not. I suppose releases prior honeycomb are only intended for phones while honeycomb and forward will support both phones and tablets.
[ This Message was edited by: Arne Anka on 2011-01-07 15:01 ] |
avmaxfan
Joined: Jul 26, 2010
Posts: 281
PM |
Reality Display not too impressive 
Read this
GSMArena hands on and some comparison shots with Super Amoled and Iphone4 Retina Display
http://www.gsmarena.com/sony_[....]ctures_and_video-news-2204.php |
tyko
Joined: Oct 08, 2007
Posts: 248
From: Sweden
PM |
The majority of previews I've read think the screen is good, one of the better ones. Does it really have to be the best to be good enough? I think the differences are so small between the screens that it's more subjective than objective which is the best one. |
SKIBBE
Joined: Dec 29, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden, Sk�vde
PM, WWW
|
you will never get your hands on a phone that is the best in every aspect. as with everything else in life, you will have to take the bad with the good  i think the phone looks beautifull, but i already own the x10 and it will be to expensive to buy this one too but i would really like to have it
[ This Message was edited by: SKIBBE on 2011-01-07 15:36 ] History
t20e > t68i(t68 f/w) > t610i > k700i > W900i > W960i > x10i > Current: Misty Silver Arc |
synn
Joined: Feb 09, 2009
Posts: > 500
PM |
I dunno why this is confusing everyone. Watch this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=koIzhLaRJJo
...and get an idea of how Honeycomb would the same underlying architecture, but have different UI elements for tablets and phones. |
Mizzle
Joined: Oct 06, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM, WWW
|
The display is brilliant None of the prototypes have been fully calibrated yet. Some are better than others at this point in time. Or at least, that's what I was told earlier today.
Not too happy about the back cover. It's made of glossy plastic and feels a bit cheap. The phone itself, however, is really great
I've got a short video coming soon.
[ This Message was edited by: Mizzle on 2011-01-07 15:51 ] |
sambouka
Joined: Jan 04, 2006
Posts: 260
From: Mount Lebanon
PM, WWW
|
2.4 
gh680-gh628-t19-t28-t39-t200-z200-v800-w810i-w900i-p910i-w850i-z610-z310i-m600-w880i-w910i-g900-c902-w705-g705-x1-w995-aino-satio-x10-vivaz-x10mini-play-arc-neo-xperias-xperiaion-xperiago-z-zultra-z1compact-z3-z3compact-z5premium-xa1ultra-xz2-xz3-xperia1 |
tranced
Joined: Jan 19, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Santo Domingo, wonDeRland
PM |
The 2.4 is maybe what the 2.1 is to the 2.0
[ This Message was edited by: tranced on 2011-01-07 15:55 ] |
Arne Anka
Joined: Nov 05, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden
PM |
On 2011-01-07 16:48:10, Mizzle wrote:
Not too happy about the back cover. It's made of glossy plastic and feels a bit cheap.
Yeah, I know what you mean. Some metal parts (e.g. the back cover or the frame) would have made the phone a bit more luxury. |
pauvincent
Joined: Oct 17, 2010
Posts: 202
From: Pasig city, Phillippines
PM |
On 2011-01-07 16:59:32, Arne Anka wrote:
On 2011-01-07 16:48:10, Mizzle wrote:
Not too happy about the back cover. It's made of glossy plastic and feels a bit cheap.
Yeah, I know what you mean. Some metal parts (e.g. the back cover or the frame) would have made the phone a bit more luxury.
Its probably because of costing back plastic is cheaper  but over all it looks good |
|
|
Posted: 2011-01-07 15:09
jay0726 | 
