| Author |
Official SE C901 Cybershot discussion |
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
I doubt sonyericsson will use samsung crappy mid-end cams again. Im pretty sure c901 use some kind of sony sensor.
do you have any idea about this matter? I don't think so, Sony sensor is in C903 and you can see how Sony-great-quality is
|
|
|
wuz-dis
Joined: Feb 17, 2009
Posts: 24
PM |
Raiderski,
k800 colurs are better than k770's,
But sharpness is much more great in k770 of course.
k800 noise-reductor works hard even in good light conditions.
c901 photo (with this forum on it) is someway similar to k770....i dunno why:) |
puestadelsol
Joined: Mar 29, 2007
Posts: 310
PM |
New live photos about SonyEricsson C901
http://www.sogi.com.tw/newfor[....]t.aspx?topic_ID=6065601&page=1 |
jaguare
Joined: Feb 12, 2009
Posts: 12
PM |
@Raederski, you have absolutley no fact which cam modules c903,c901 use. There is no way you can see that to just look at some pictures.
I have plenty of ideas in this matter by the way, besides i had k770 some year ago and it have worse colours, details and overall quality then both my k810, c902.
ta ta
|
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
no facts? I'm in image analysis since K750 and it's not that hard for me to find out such things. diversification of solutions is nothing new, SE often use cameras by OmniVision, Samsung and Foxconn (for video calls). each manufacturer have own unique quality characteristic, Sony is very unique because of chromatic noise
C903 and C901 - Sony and not Sony
at first I believed in miracle (Sony improved technology and software) but then a simple question appeared: why not for C903 too? answer is more than simple
do you feel uncomfortable with Samsung camera on board? you can buy C903 instead of C901... if SE won't replace camera to Samsung in it
|
King9
Joined: Jan 12, 2009
Posts: 53
PM |
I might be blind, but honestley, how can you see that c903 use a sony sensor on that particular picture ?
both pictures is taken in different type of light-surroundings (c901 have brighter background. they not even shoot at the same place, which make it very difficult to compare this crops), it also different distances between this pictures. (c903 is shoot way closer).
i see you are in image analysis, (i assume its private studying like most photo interested people, or am I wrong)
regarding to sonyericsson support, c901 will cost ~300-320 euro. |
Vipera ammodytes
Joined: Sep 22, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Serbia
PM |
I might be blind, but honestley, how can you see that c903 use a sony sensor on that particular picture ?
because image quality(algorithm) is the same with k850 and c902 and they have sony sensor...
and seems plank is again here, now jaguare
_________________
[ This Message was edited by: Vipera ammodytes on 2009-02-19 13:46 ] |
marty mcfly
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: England
PM |
Yes Vipe I think you're right there. |
puestadelsol
Joined: Mar 29, 2007
Posts: 310
PM |
On 2009-02-18 11:09:06, Mizzle wrote:
The C901 will at least be available in the Nordic countries.
Just in Nordic countries? Is there any chance to be available in Central-Europe too? |
jaguare
Joined: Feb 12, 2009
Posts: 12
PM |
On 2009-02-19 18:49:36, puestadelsol wrote:
On 2009-02-18 11:09:06, Mizzle wrote:
The C901 will at least be available in the Nordic countries.
Just in Nordic countries? Is there any chance to be available in Central-Europe too?
I guess both c901 and c903 will be released worldwide, would be strange otherwise. |
King9
Joined: Jan 12, 2009
Posts: 53
PM |
@Vipera ammodytes,
I understood his point at the beginning, I just wondered "how" you guys could see this difference on two pictures taken in two different light surroundings and different distances.
if you compare 2 different images (crops) its very hard to see what type of cam modules they use, IF they are shoot in different surroundings, (especially this type of mid end cameras who have quite blurred crop quality). |
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
King9
as I wrote before, it's all about unique charactersitics. light is not important in this case, if you will compare 2 shots from Sony camera but in different light conditions you'll find that noise charactersitic doesn't change much. in daylight shot you don't see noise because it have low magnitude but it's still there, in low light magnitude increasing. Sony technology is quite constant, this is why older models can be very good reference point. I see that something is 'wrong' in pic from C901, it just doesn't fit to Sony. both pics are ISO200, they should have amount of noise near the same level. C903 looks like typical Sony charactersitic but C901 is far from anything I know about Sony cameras. second thing is sharpening processing, once again both pics are different in this matter. Mizzle may dispel any doubts, two similar photos even 100% crops from new C90x models will tell the truth
|
gtr83
Joined: Sep 27, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: Indonesia
PM |
I doubt that jaguare is plank. The guy's English can't improve so much in just a matter of weeks.
Nokia 3520 > 6600 > W800i > W890i > C702 > C905 > BB 9500 > Samsung INNOV8 |
AbuBasim
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2009-02-20 14:30:57, gtr83 wrote:
I doubt that jaguare is plank. The guy's English can't improve so much in just a matter of weeks.
translate.google.com ?
|
DEAF
Joined: Mar 30, 2007
Posts: 313
PM |
the name should be the other away around c903 should be with xneon light and c901 should be the normal led.by the way if you check SE gallaries there is no c901 only c903. |
|
|
Posted: 2009-02-18 11:27
