| Author |
Post comments and pictures about/from C702 here |
number1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM |
c702 VS K800 macros
c702: R3BA035 , standard camdriver
K800: k810 R8BA024, camdriver N1 3.05
c702
http://i222.photobucket.com/a[....]d234/sniper100590/DSC00001.jpg
k800
http://i222.photobucket.com/a[....]d234/sniper100590/DSC00027.jpg
c702
http://i222.photobucket.com/a[....]34/sniper100590/DSC00002-1.jpg
k800
http://i222.photobucket.com/a[....]d234/sniper100590/DSC00025.jpg
c702
http://i222.photobucket.com/a[....]34/sniper100590/DSC00001-1.jpg
k800
http://i222.photobucket.com/a[....]d234/sniper100590/DSC00023.jpg
[ This Message was edited by: number1 on 2008-07-05 18:15 ] |
|
|
gstblack
Joined: Sep 17, 2007
Posts: 7
PM |
please ,post more night photos.i think that c702 is weaker than k810,at camera quality.Am i wrong?? |
c96sthl
Joined: Mar 31, 2002
Posts: > 500
PM |
heres one...i donno how other phone perform but this one i know cannot beat or match my sony T30 but tht is a big different to compare this way.
in my opinion even c702 is a cybershot...but it is a cybershot with niche target which is the active life people....something i found it not up to the target group is....please get the focus speed faster...tough to take moving stuff .... cannot match the target audience active pace hahaha.
anyone got a k850 or k800 to snap shot bird nest to compare? hehe |
jigonx
Joined: Oct 16, 2007
Posts: 327
PM |
All Low light picture..
 |
number1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM |
by my c702
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=12818
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=12819
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=12820
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=12821
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=12822 |
jered1975
Joined: Jul 07, 2008
Posts: 1
PM |
Photos don't look any better than my old K750. That said, I might just buy it because it's splash resistant. My K750 bit the dust after 2 years, I hope this one will be a bit more wear resistant.
[ This Message was edited by: jered1975 on 2008-07-07 09:23 ] |
se_dude
Joined: Nov 07, 2007
Posts: > 500
PM |
^^and cos it also has gps.  |
number1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM |
i prefer the c702's cam to my k750's cam, pics look sharper and it doesn't blurr so easily like my old k750i used to. |
number1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM |
Geotagged
taken in the rain
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=12827
finished raining
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=12828
[ This Message was edited by: number1 on 2008-07-07 14:08 ] |
gstblack
Joined: Sep 17, 2007
Posts: 7
PM |
i'm disapointed of the quality of the pictures.Maybe it will improve on time with the new camera drivers..hope so |
number1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM |
The pictures look fine to me what do you think's wrong with them???. |
Muhammad-Oli
Joined: Jun 13, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: The NZ of L
PM |
@number1: Your images at the top of this page seem to show the C702's macro is better than the K800i's (apart from the last pair of photos).
I am seriously considering the C702 as my next phone and need some opinions on it. Would it be too much to ask for you to tell me your personal opinion on the phone, and how you think it compares to the K800i? It would be great if you could!
If anyone else who owns a C702 wants to give me their opinions, that would be great too!
This message was posted in the mail
2008, 2009, 2010 Best Australasian Member. |
TinyTiger
Joined: Jun 30, 2008
Posts: 5
PM, WWW
|
Pictures here look much nicer compared to my dire Nokia 3120  |
technical-expert
Joined: Mar 13, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Pacific Rim
PM |
well if somone is satisfied with C702 pictures, i don't have any words to say.it totally looks disappointing.
 K700-  W800- [W810]- W200-[ P990]=[Current]. One expert at esato that never lets u down technical-expert. |
borg_
Joined: Feb 20, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Algarve - Portugal
PM |
For a 3.2 MP it's not bad at all
Xperia ZL White + C905 Ice Silver + MW600 + MBW-150 Executive + /// T39m  Ericsson Technology |
|
|
Posted: 2008-07-05 19:14
K700- 
W800- 
Ericsson Technology
