| Author |
Post your pictures (and videos) taken with your K800i / K790a |
blackspot
Joined: Sep 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Philippines
PM |
try this links:
W900i
K800i (also 2mp)
Minolta Dimage 3.2 mp (this picture in 2mp)
resistance is futile. |
|
|
Arne Anka
Joined: Nov 05, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden
PM |
Works. |
driftmania
Joined: Mar 07, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: California, USA
PM |
looks like the w900i produces better color. |
HellFire
Joined: Jun 28, 2003
Posts: 188
From: Your Face
PM |
As you can see I’m not very good at panoramic but I only done it quick
[ This Message was edited by: HellFire on 2006-07-05 06:57 ] |
JiggyJaggy
Joined: May 21, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: London, UK
PM |
I have just done a comparison of the W800i pics .vs. K800i pics and I cant see a whole lot of difference, concidering the K800i camera in mathematical terms is 1.5 times the quality of the 2MP W800i.
Judge for yourself....
W800i - yes this is the w800i pic:
K800i pic:
Your thoughts?
|
goldenface
Joined: Dec 17, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Liverpool City Centre
PM |
@JiggyJaggy
Definately sharper on the last pic, look at the light reflecting on the shoulder of the bottle.
Did you need to adjust the brightness on the first pic? |
JiggyJaggy
Joined: May 21, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: London, UK
PM |
Nope, did nothing at all on either camera, both in fine mode. W800i=2mp; K800i=3mp setting. And K800i was on best pic.
both were on exact same time, angle, lighting and same object. I can see the difference on the sharpness, but no a mega amount like the difference between 0.6mp and 2mp which should be a similar difference from 2mp to 3.2 mp.
Im not knocking the quality, im so happy now that I can leave my digital camera at home!
|
goldenface
Joined: Dec 17, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Liverpool City Centre
PM |
@jiggyjaggy
Was the AF switched on on both? |
rockygali
Joined: Nov 21, 2005
Posts: > 500
From:
PM, WWW
|
i dont care about the sharpness coz it shows alright... im concern about the color realism... K800 has this blueish effect...
"Darkness is the absence of light.. and not the opposite..." |
JiggyJaggy
Joined: May 21, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: London, UK
PM |
yes by AF I take it you mean Auto Focus, then yes it was. Very good function btw
|
goldenface
Joined: Dec 17, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Liverpool City Centre
PM |
Is just that the w800 seems to be focussing on the corners of the A4 paper in the background while the other seems to be focussing right on the bottle. |
JiggyJaggy
Joined: May 21, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: London, UK
PM |
I will have to check if I had Macro mode on with either of them.
|
datx
Joined: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 130
From: Portugal
PM, WWW
|
Just because W800 has warmer colors doesn't mean it is a better cam... on that pics k800 focused much better... the colors are just different not better/worse... and if u like warmer colors just adjust them on photoshop
And k800i is not 1.5 times the quality of w800, it is 1.5 times the size of w800
[ This Message was edited by: datx on 2006-07-05 11:55 ] |
etaab
Joined: Jan 23, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: UK - South Yorkshire
PM |
@ datx - I think the point people are making is, is that the K800i being the superior phone should automatically produce the superior pictures, without then having to resort to touching them up on a computer.
Personally, im still very unimpressed by the K800i's 3.2mp pictures. They do appear sharper, and i expect through firmware updates will have better colour reproduction than any previous SE phone, but they're nothing that make me go wow ! 
Im considering keeping my K750i, and buying a N93 or something to go with it. 
Check me out on Instagram ! search for etaab ! |
pow1990
Joined: Aug 29, 2005
Posts: 277
From: Maidstone, Kent England
PM |
agreed, i want to see more comparisons with the n80 and k800i, i feel nokia may have have a better cam...
jus my 2 cents!
_________________
Ericsson->Alcatel->Nokia5110->Nokia3210->Nokia3310->Nokia3330->Nokia7210->Sony Ericsson k700i->Sony Ericsson k750i->Nokia N70
[ This Message was edited by: pow1990 on 2006-07-05 12:40 ] |
|
|
Posted: 2006-07-05 02:51
