| Author |
Post pictures taken with your C902 Cybershot Phone |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
well.
after you said THAT THIS CMOS pictures look to noisy in full size, i just laughed myself.
¤ first because it have low noise, (which most everyone see, except for you and Vipera  ).
¤ second, whats the point to nag about cmos sensors, when there is no better sensors around...i dont get it ??
(i-mobile ccd sensor is hardly any better)
besides, this is a picture thread..... no one cares about our crap.
POST c902 pics or get lost 
-----------------------------------------------------
well. i take the first step then - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-03-19 22:40 ] |
|
|
blerk
Joined: Jun 12, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: London, UK
PM |
Nice flaming going on here, high amusement value, low discussion value as the points one carefully picks are just as easy ignored by the other party It's one of the reasons arguing about these things (especially on forums) is pretty silly and useless.
Seeing this a thread about posting photo's taken with C902 phones talk about other models has no place here and should deemed off topic. If you want to compare just open a new topic and argue in there
|
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
blerk, nice flaming? man! it's not even worth to make a popcorn and open bottle of beer for more pleasure when reading replies
user rating: 2/10
I remember much tougher discussions, dohh... do we getting older?
|
blerk
Joined: Jun 12, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: London, UK
PM |
I'm still new here! But you're telling me there was better stuff? Time to dig in the archives 
|
djsquare
Joined: Sep 01, 2006
Posts: 47
PM |
Hey guys chilllll......
Frankly speaking I Know how does it feel when ur own cam doesnt work so well or it doesent stand your expectations. I myself is a very great fan of sony products from mobiles to cam... But sometmes it happens that ssome sony products doesnt seem to stand our expectations which doesnt mean that you still appreciate the bad products or fight for it to proove it.. I just used my c902 today with the latest firmware R3E and im quite satisfied with the new cam drive, and its lot more better then the older firmware althought the cam drive is same as 2.1.
Posting some of the pics as well....
Auto daylight
Auto Indascent
i also needed to ask is it possible by lowering the iso from 100 to 50 will help to reduce more noise????
|
AbuBasim
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2009-03-19 23:59:39, Raiderski wrote:
blerk, nice flaming? man! it's not even worth to make a popcorn and open bottle of beer for more pleasure when reading replies
user rating: 2/10
I remember much tougher discussions, dohh... do we getting older?
Apologies from my side. plankgatan really flips his lid when someone mentions noise, doesn't he? I just don't have the energy to repeat all over again what we already discussed seven months ago.
[ This Message was edited by: AbuBasim on 2009-03-20 05:36 ] |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
ABU...im starting to think you just foolish now
7 month ago i used a very early firmware who had a bit more noise...BUT NOISE HAS BEEN REDUCED MUCH since that, thats all im saying.....
and yes, pictures have lower noise now days...its easy to see:
latest firmware...macro_______
first firmware...macro________
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-03-20 13:11 ] |
djsquare
Joined: Sep 01, 2006
Posts: 47
PM |
Alright......Prank & ABU...Plz compro and give some suggestions improve C902 pics rather then bullying each others.....
I am very impressed with the new firmware its awesome pics...... |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
think its hard to get Panorama good, this one became great i think
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-03-20 11:38 ] |
Knight UK
Joined: Feb 11, 2009
Posts: 69
From: UK
PM, WWW
|
I'm thinking of getting a C902 or a Nokia 6220, both 5mp, but the powerful xenon flash and bigger screen on the nokia kind of make me lean towards that more.
The tiny screen of the C902 kind of puts me off most.
I know it takes good or even great day time shots, but what about low light, indoor, and night time? Is the flash on it just a waste of space?
Help anyone? |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
he he he... what is 0.2" bigger ???
tell me what you can do better with a 2.2" screen, then with a 2.0" screen ??
sure, go for a Nokia, but dont buy 6220 classic, its the most plastic phone i ever tried, my friend regret himself sooo much after he got his 6220. (its build quality is very weak).
go for c902, its a much better phone.
(im not lying now, but my c902 feels exactly like it did the very first day i got it.
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-03-20 18:28 ] |
Knight UK
Joined: Feb 11, 2009
Posts: 69
From: UK
PM, WWW
|
I know on paper it doesn't sound like much, but I have a C510 at the moment, and the 0.2" does make a bigger difference than you'd think when viewing pictures on the screen.
I was also considering the KF750 Secret as a 5mp shooter, similar quality photos with less noise (looking at old shootouts here on esato), and bigger screen. Don't like the little touch bit though.
The only thing that worries me about all of these phones without xenon is, will I be able to take good quality shots in low light? For example in a local pub or restaurant that isn't well lit? |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
if i should choose between Secret and 6220 classic, i should go for Secret right away .....
still, i would choose C902 before both 6220 and secret, (its to Classic & Solid )
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
about LED Vs Xenon........there is 2 things who is better with LED
¤ you can use the flash outdoor with very nice result. (all my xenon cellphones have not produced this balanced flash outdoor)..........
¤ LED is nearly always better in macro, (xenon gets often to bleached)
flash lowlight
flash off lowlight
im not saying LED is better then xenon, xenon is better indoor, portrait, etc....(but its good to know about this matters before you decide)
good luck.....................................
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-03-20 22:49 ] |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
indoor, no flash, EV -0.7...
crop
full size
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=18484
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-03-21 19:10 ] |
cia3194
Joined: Oct 13, 2008
Posts: 23
PM |
The Metropolitan Cathedral in Iasi, Romania:
The same photo with Photo Fix applied:
A man reading the news:
 |
|
|
Posted: 2009-03-19 22:58
