Hybrid Camera Driver for W800i/K750

ilabstudios

Joined: Mar 03, 2006
Posts: 213
From: London, UK
PM, WWW

Posted: 2006-09-09 05:53

Macro-mode Shots (5.6C

Night: Off

Night: On

ilabstudios

Joined: Mar 03, 2006
Posts: 213
From: London, UK
PM, WWW

Posted: 2006-09-09 06:06

Quote:

On 2006-09-09 05:43:22, QuickShare� wrote:
errr.... the macromode was fine no problem.. just.. i cant spot the different between this and the previous 5.6a camdriver..
_________________
My K750i Flickr Site..
Flickr.com

[ This Message was edited by: QuickShare� on 2006-09-09 04:46 ]

Dont you find the new 5.6C more sharper and clearer??

QuickShare

Joined: May 06, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: MYR
PM

Posted: 2006-09-09 06:09

ok here's the comparisson between 2.4 Hybrid and 5.6C Camdriver..

5.6C Camdriver

2.4 Hybrid Camdriver

same shots.. same place.. my hand are dead steady.. this are the result i get

Quote:

On 2006-09-09 06:06:03, ilabstudios wrote:

Dont you find the new 5.6C more sharper and clearer??

yea... as i said.. the macro mode on 5.6C work perfectly.. i was pin-point at the distance shots

_________________
My K750i Flickr Site..
Flickr.com

[ This Message was edited by: QuickShare� on 2006-09-09 05:12 ]

ilabstudios

Joined: Mar 03, 2006
Posts: 213
From: London, UK
PM, WWW

Posted: 2006-09-09 06:16

Well I can notice straight away from your comparision above, that the 5.6C is clearly stronger in colour & sharpness. The clarity in the 5.6 version is much better

ilabstudios

Joined: Mar 03, 2006
Posts: 213
From: London, UK
PM, WWW

Posted: 2006-09-09 06:29

For example, take the shingled roof as something to focus on, notice how in the 5.6 version it photographed more of the detail but the 2.4 didn't and left the roof slightly blured with less detail.. This shows you that 5.6 is alot sharper in detail and will pick up more of what you're looking at.

5.6C example

2.4 example

_________________

QuickShare

Joined: May 06, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: MYR
PM

Posted: 2006-09-09 06:31

ok that's your point of view.. from my point of view, the 2.4 Hybrid has the ability to focus the object well... but for 5.6C.. can't see it happend .. maybe 5.6C are more strong on Macro mode shoot

EDIT: @ilabstudios
You get it completely wrong mate.. The top one should be 5.6C and the bottom is 2.4 Hybrid..

_________________
My K750i Flickr Site..
Flickr.com

[ This Message was edited by: QuickShare� on 2006-09-09 05:33 ]

arnarn911

Joined: Oct 04, 2005
Posts: 141
From: Pilipinas
PM

Posted: 2006-09-09 06:38

In my observation 2.4 is sharper but then you lose on overexposure. I think what we all are looking for is the best compromise between exposure and sharpness. Just my 2 cents.

ilabstudios

Joined: Mar 03, 2006
Posts: 213
From: London, UK
PM, WWW

Posted: 2006-09-09 06:41

:S why would you swap them?? so your saying that 2.4 was more sharper than 5.6 :S

I was justing using the photos you gathered and blowing them up to focus in on a section so you could see the difference in sharpness!

If you cant see that 5.6 is clearly sharper and more vibrant in colour then I dont know why I'm on this forum :S:S

chakme

Joined: Jul 22, 2006
Posts: 38
From: Brazil
PM

Posted: 2006-09-09 06:41

Agree with QuickShare�, the 2.4 hybrid is sharper than 5.6C ... Oh "cruel doubt" ...

Hugs

@ilabstudios
What QuickShare� said is that you inverted the order of the pics .. the first one is 2.4 hybrid and second 5.6C. As it's shown above ...

[ This Message was edited by: chakme on 2006-09-09 05:44 ]

[ This Message was edited by: chakme on 2006-09-09 05:45 ]

ilabstudios

Joined: Mar 03, 2006
Posts: 213
From: London, UK
PM, WWW

Posted: 2006-09-09 06:48

Ok check it.. blew it up bigger so you lot can see

2.4 (less sharp)

5.6 (sharper)

If you cannot see the differnce then I think you maybe using a LCD or TFT Monitor which might make what your seeing more brighter in contrast :S

QuickShare

Joined: May 06, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: MYR
PM

Posted: 2006-09-09 06:58

gosh.. i just can't understand.. im the one who took those picture.. and you the one who swaping those picture just to prove that 5.6C are the best? that's phetatic... please.. wear your spectacle or maybe use a Magnifier if you don't have one..

Quote:

On 2006-09-09 06:09:11, QuickShare� wrote:
ok here's the comparisson between 2.4 Hybrid and 5.6C Camdriver..

5.6C Camdriver

2.4 Hybrid Camdriver

its damn clear picture above 5.6C Camdriver comes first and 2.4Hybrid Camdriver on the second one..

_________________
My K750i Flickr Site..
Flickr.com

[ This Message was edited by: QuickShare� on 2006-09-09 06:04 ]

ilabstudios

Joined: Mar 03, 2006
Posts: 213
From: London, UK
PM, WWW

Posted: 2006-09-09 07:04

What are you talking about swapping? I'm confussed this topic is about camdrivers and what is better what does what. and from my KNOWLEDGE!!!! based on graphic editing.. yes I showed you simply how your opinion that 2.4 was sharper thats all. no need to get hyped!

I just like prooving people wrong!

and I didnt swap anything apart from when you informed that the photos were in the wrong order.. because that wasnt important, what was important to me is that people should have noticed that the 5.6 driver was clearer, and if they cant then I am sure they are either not used to making comparisons between images or theyre using an LCD or TFT monitor instead of a CRT

mailliw_17

Joined: Dec 15, 2002
Posts: 316
From: Sexmoan
PM, WWW

Posted: 2006-09-09 07:05

just do more comparison pictures with these two drivers then we can conclude. peace...

_____________________
frolics never dies!!!

QuickShare

Joined: May 06, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: MYR
PM

Posted: 2006-09-09 07:06

Quote:

On 2006-09-09 06:41:12, ilabstudios wrote:
:Swhy would you swap them?? so your saying that 2.4 was more sharper than 5.6 :S

I was justing using the photos you gathered and blowing them up to focus in on a section so you could see the difference in sharpness!

If you cant see that 5.6 is clearly sharper and more vibrant in colour then I dont know why I'm on this forum :S:S

you dare enough to say you didn't mention anything about swaping?

My Flickr Site..
Flickr.com
Most Popular Newbie 2006

ilabstudios

Joined: Mar 03, 2006
Posts: 213
From: London, UK
PM, WWW

Posted: 2006-09-09 07:18

Quickshare?? who eva u are or whateva ur name is?? ok.. "mate". I dont understand what u meant by swapping.. when you posted that I saved the top and bottom image I did not save 2.4 and then reposted it as 5.6 otherwise what would be the point??

When I made my comparision I put the 2.4 above the 5.6 because i didnt think it would make a difference as if you would bother reading what i wrote I specifically said, "notice how in the 5.6 version it photographed more of the detail but the 2.4 didn't and left the roof slightly blured with less detail". So whether or not the order of the images come in it makes no difference :S:S anyone would no that!! I told you on there which 1 is which...

to make my mood even happier here you go again round 3:

2.4 once again (less sharp and blurry)

5.6 which an old person could see is sharper.. all you need to do is look at the edges!!!

Forum > Sony Ericsson / Sony > Software, Firmware and Drivers > Hybrid Camera Driver for W800i/K750