| Author |
Raider camera driver for K790, K800 and K810 (v6.6.5) |
chiliseo
Joined: Jul 19, 2007
Posts: 66
From: El Salvador
PM, WWW
|
again, FF = -1 or EV=-0.3 |
|
|
hfmls
Joined: Mar 17, 2008
Posts: 489
PM |
.....
and again, PLEASE ff stands for what? u mean position -0.3 or the value -0.3 of EV? like, less exposure? |
VILLA21
Joined: May 27, 2003
Posts: 61
From: Greece
PM |
On 2008-08-07 22:10:06, milan91 wrote:
WoW, great pics Raiderek 
On 2008-08-06 22:39:15, VILLA21 wrote:
@milan91,
can u share your OSD png's pls?
Ok, when finish i'll upload 
Yeah! Just retain the default EV position
_________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/milanche91
Ericsson 628>3210>3310>3410>3510>siemens mc60>K750i>> 2x nokia 6630>>w810i>>K800i+2GB modded to max
[ This Message was edited by: milan91 on 2008-08-07 21:13 ]
|
chiliseo
Joined: Jul 19, 2007
Posts: 66
From: El Salvador
PM, WWW
|
it is THE VALUE EXPOSURE=-0.3 (less exposure than default)
it's all about exposure, since i't the exposure value we are changing on driver, not on joystic (EXPOSURE= $s5 ff; )
[ This Message was edited by: chiliseo on 2008-08-09 20:39 ]
[ This Message was edited by: chiliseo on 2008-08-09 20:40 ] |
hfmls
Joined: Mar 17, 2008
Posts: 489
PM |
ok, thank you.
i've made these changes:
SHARPNESS= $s5 07;
CONTRAST= $s5 01;
SATURATION= $s5 07;
EXPOSURE= $s5 00;
SHARPNESS_2= $s5 08;
CONTRAST_2= $s5 02;
SATURATION_2= $s5 00;
EXPOSURE_2= $s5 02;
SHARPNESS_3= $s5 07;
CONTRAST_3= $s5 00;
SATURATION_3= $s5 07;
EXPOSURE_3= $s5 01;
XENON_ISO= $s6 07;
XENON_ISO_MACRO= $s6 01;
XENON_ISO_MANUAL= $s6 04;
XENON_SATURATION= 06; |
deadman4168
Joined: Jul 24, 2007
Posts: 64
PM |
@chiliseo
so which pic is closer to what u see with ur eyes....coz thats what matters most....and also i found that on the second pic...the green leaves othe right side somewhat lost clour...
so actually waiting for ur confirmation..that which one is closer to real....... |
milan91
Joined: Jun 04, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Europe
PM |
VILLA21, ok
Here's one pic with the best camdriver
|
chiliseo
Joined: Jul 19, 2007
Posts: 66
From: El Salvador
PM, WWW
|
As a secondary efect, the colors seems to change a little bit
but in my opinion the second pic is closer to what my eyes see.
Here another comparisson, this time indoor and flash fired
first pic, original settings and saturation=06
second pic, brightness=02, contrast=01, saturation=0a and exposure=ff
Do you see the diference?
[ This Message was edited by: chiliseo on 2008-08-09 21:05 ] |
deadman4168
Joined: Jul 24, 2007
Posts: 64
PM |
whats 0a stands for??????????? |
deadman4168
Joined: Jul 24, 2007
Posts: 64
PM |
very minor difference...i think the second pic just got a little ..very little brighter |
chiliseo
Joined: Jul 19, 2007
Posts: 66
From: El Salvador
PM, WWW
|
On 2008-08-09 22:04:11, deadman4168 wrote:
whats 0a stands for???????????
saturation = 0a is because when you increase the contrast to 01 and the brightness to 02, the saturation seems to decrease, so I increased to 0a. |
deadman4168
Joined: Jul 24, 2007
Posts: 64
PM |
no no...i just wanted to know that what 0a reprents in numerical value.........1 2 or 3 ...or something like..?????????? |
chiliseo
Joined: Jul 19, 2007
Posts: 66
From: El Salvador
PM, WWW
|
On 2008-08-09 22:08:35, deadman4168 wrote:
very minor difference...i think the second pic just got a little ..very little brighter
Yes, the difference is minor, but my idea is to improve the contrast (even a little) without affecting the exposure and getting a less washed pics. |
chiliseo
Joined: Jul 19, 2007
Posts: 66
From: El Salvador
PM, WWW
|
On 2008-08-09 22:10:19, deadman4168 wrote:
no no...i just wanted to know that what 0a reprents in numerical value.........1 2 or 3 ...or something like..??????????
0a=10 |
chiliseo
Joined: Jul 19, 2007
Posts: 66
From: El Salvador
PM, WWW
|
Another comparisson
This time indoor pics without flash
both pics scene=normal, shutter speed = 1/30 ISO=100
first pic original settings and saturation=06
second pic brightness=02, contrast=01, exposure=ff and saturation=0a
And....
if I use the default settings and only increase the exposure one value to +0.3, the result is this
again, washed pic and low contrast.
[ This Message was edited by: chiliseo on 2008-08-09 22:31 ]
[ This Message was edited by: chiliseo on 2008-08-09 22:33 ] |
|
|
Posted: 2008-08-09 21:03
