| Author |
All about camdriver modding (for modders) |
alvink83
Joined: Nov 27, 2007
Posts: 20
PM |
On 2008-03-01 13:36:12, Raiderski wrote:
it's value corresponding to maximum exposure time of snapshot with used flash
So, it's useless when the flash is disabled. Right?
What is the best value for taking a portrait? | |
|
sadeghi85
Joined: Oct 13, 2007
Posts: 341
PM |
On 2008-02-29 23:19:46, jomateixa wrote:
Please guys stop...Disabling WB is a stupidity itself. JPEG compression mods too.
Agree 100%, especially with the compression part. 
[ This Message was edited by: sadeghi85 on 2008-03-01 13:48 ] |
number1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM |
whitebalance off does make a difference so i will always use whitebalance off don't bother arguing with me i ain't changing my mind.
there is some point to modding the jpeg compression it really only makes a difference on vga & 1mp mode arcording to jpeg snoop my pictures are uncompressed. 2mp mode i can get 98% compression & 3mp mode max seems to be 97% same as standard driver. increasing file sizes makes no noticeable difference but i just prefer 800kb-900kb rather than 600kb-900kb.
|
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
sorry guys but i just can't read nonsenses... can you?
LOL number1 you just roxx - i'm a fan of you!
1.
whitebalance off - do you understand what are you talking about? i don't think so. i can only repeat: auto white balance in your driver is ON! you're blind or you don't know what is auto white balance. do you feel that white balance is off in your bones or what?
2.
arcording to jpeg snoop my pictures are uncompressed
OMG! you really don't understand what you're talking about! you have RAW pictures, you re truly genius! especially for you: even jpeg with 100% quality is still COMPRESSED file
man, please stop this nonsense! you completely don't know what you are talking about! people, someone please explain this to him
|
jomateixa
Joined: Dec 09, 2007
Posts: > 500
From:
PM |
On 2008-03-02 19:02:30, Raiderski wrote:
sorry guys but i just can't read nonsenses... can you?
LOL number1 you just roxx - i'm a fan of you!
1.
whitebalance off - do you understand what are you talking about? i don't think so. i can only repeat: auto white balance in your driver is ON! you're blind or you don't know what is auto white balance. do you feel that white balance is off in your bones or what?
2.
arcording to jpeg snoop my pictures are uncompressed
OMG! you really don't understand what you're talking about! you have RAW pictures, you re truly genius! especially for you: even jpeg with 100% quality is still COMPRESSED file
man, please stop this nonsense! you completely don't know what you are talking about! people, someone please explain this to him
Number1 I agree with Raiderski, you showed to us several times that you don't have the knowledge, STOP saying stupidities. You showed us too that you have 17 years old. You don't have to be right in everything, Raiderski already showed you that your WB OFF is not WB OFF...what do you want more?
P.D.- JPEG compression mod is the greatest stupidity that we can do, as our eyes can't see it.
[ This Message was edited by: jomateixa on 2008-03-02 18:17 ]
[ This Message was edited by: jomateixa on 2008-03-02 18:19 ] |
number1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM |
From VGA
*** Marker: DQT ***
Define a Quantization Table.
OFFSET: 0x000016B4
Table length = 132
----
Precision=8 bits
Destination ID=0 (Luminance)
DQT, Row #0: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
DQT, Row #1: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
DQT, Row #2: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
DQT, Row #3: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
DQT, Row #4: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
DQT, Row #5: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
DQT, Row #6: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
DQT, Row #7: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Approx quality factor = 100.00 (scaling=2.99 variance=6.13)
----
Precision=8 bits
Destination ID=1 (Chrominance)
DQT, Row #0: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
DQT, Row #1: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
DQT, Row #2: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
DQT, Row #3: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
DQT, Row #4: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
DQT, Row #5: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
DQT, Row #6: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
DQT, Row #7: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Approx quality factor = 100.00 (scaling=1.54 variance=1.58)
does say ASSESSMENT: Image is very likely processed/edited at the bottom though.
whitebalance came from k770
seq_set_prop_1_0 = #WR_REG(14, 80) //Auto WB
also from k770 to prove 80 means off
//**************************************************
// Digital Sharpening, property 21
//
// 0 => Off 1 => +1 1 => +2 1 => +3
// 4 => +4 5 => +5 6 => Auto
//**************************************************
seq_set_prop_15_0 = #WR_REG(21, 80);
seq_set_prop_15_1 = #WR_REG(21, 00);
seq_set_prop_15_2 = #WR_REG(21, 01);
seq_set_prop_15_3 = #WR_REG(21, 02);
seq_set_prop_15_4 = #WR_REG(21, 03);
seq_set_prop_15_5 = #WR_REG(21, 04);
seq_set_prop_15_6 = #WR_REG(21, 40);
@jomateixa you say i don't have the knowledge, look at the colour saturation in your driver it doesn't work at least i can do something as simple as working colour saturation. i was the first to use colour saturation in the k800i, first driver with working colour satuaraton was my 2.86 at least i archieved something new and useful i am not always right maybe i'm not right about the jpeg compression but i stand by my whitebalance off. |
jomateixa
Joined: Dec 09, 2007
Posts: > 500
From:
PM |
AHAHAHAHAHA... So the colour saturation in my driver is not working? LOL and LOL
Actually you're a spammer
[ This Message was edited by: jomateixa on 2008-03-02 18:46 ] |
number1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM |
On 2008-03-02 19:38:43, jomateixa wrote:
AHAHAHAHAHA... So the colour saturation in my driver is not working? LOL and LOL
Actually you're a spammer
[ This Message was edited by: jomateixa on 2008-03-02 18:40 ]
no it's not and yes it is funny
so now you want to start trying to insult me & call me childish names over the internet, how sad i think you need to grow up. |
jomateixa
Joined: Dec 09, 2007
Posts: > 500
From:
PM |
Now I understand Raiderski, you're really annoying...You're saying that colour saturation is not working on my driver, twice (LOL). Install it and use it, cuz your driver is PATHETIC |
number1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM |
On 2008-03-02 19:49:45, jomateixa wrote:
Now I understand Raiderski, you're really annoying...You're saying that colour saturation is not working on my driver, twice (LOL). Install it and use it, cuz your driver is PATHETIC
you think i'm annoying for telling you something twice two months was the first time i told you so did genus, try having some twat with every new camdriver you spend alot of your free time making & testing always finding something negative to say about it then always trying to start a argument with you about it thats annoying.
cuz your driver is PATHETIC<<< thats even more childish than trying to insult me.
|
jomateixa
Joined: Dec 09, 2007
Posts: > 500
From:
PM |
On 2008-03-02 19:57:56, number1 wrote:
On 2008-03-02 19:49:45, jomateixa wrote:
Now I understand Raiderski, you're really annoying...You're saying that colour saturation is not working on my driver, twice (LOL). Install it and use it, cuz your driver is PATHETIC
you think i'm annoying for telling you something twice two months was the first time i told you so did genus, try having some twat with every new camdriver you spend alot of your free time making & testing always finding something negative to say about it then always trying to start a argument with you about it thats annoying.
cuz your driver is PATHETIC<<< thats even more childish than trying to insult me.
My last answer to you about this.
1) Genus is another SUPER STAR like you.
2) Command 58 IS WORKING on NORM_MODE macro.
3) I repeat install and check VividColour or Withan.
P.D.- If you say a stupidity then I'll try to explain it, but if you say a stupidity several times then I'm glad to insult you for making us lose time. Don't spam.
[ This Message was edited by: jomateixa on 2008-03-02 19:08 ] |
milan91
Joined: Jun 04, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Europe
PM |
fight, fight, fight 
joma, number1 chill
|
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
Approx quality factor = 100.00 (scaling=2.99 variance=6.13)
quality is not equivalent of compression (at least you can say: 100% quality = very low compression). you don't understand what exactly compression means in JPEG, maybe you should google it?
whitebalance came from k770
K770: vendor = Samsung Techwin
K800: vendor = Sony
values for K770 don't have to match in K800. once again especially for you:
1 line: quick after camera open, some seconds later (my driver) whitebalance on
2 line: quick after camera open, some seconds later (your driver) "whitebalance off"
why are you so stubborn? we are not against you, we are against your stupid theories which we can easily blow up while you cannot prove their truth
_________________
K800 R1KG001 (camdriver 6.1)
raider.4shared.com
flickr.com/photos/raiderek
[ This Message was edited by: Raiderski on 2008-03-02 19:15 ] |
brazzuka's
Joined: Nov 14, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: South World-Antartida-Sweden
PM, WWW
|
Number1
Please stop pay attention bro and try to at least understand what others are saying you and a little engineering could help you
Thanks Number1
But in my opinion the limit file size or buffer size Jpeg is not determined by firmware but is determined by hardware featured by tests and studies but for each model based on the table of JPEG compression
Register MT9V series Micron VGA
[R37]:1—0x125 – Color Saturation Control (R/W)
Default 0x0005=>Values
0x1[25]=>25
Color Saturation Control
#WRITE_IFP(25 0005) // AWB_SPEED_SATURATION (auto)
#WRITE_IFP(25 0055) // AWB_SPEED_SATURATION (125%)
#WRITE_IFP(25 002D) // AWB_SPEED_SATURATION (137,5%)
#WRITE_IFP(25 XXXX) // AWB_SPEED_SATURATION (X%)
Description This register specifies the color saturation control settings.
Bit 5:3 Specify overall attenuation of the color saturation.
000: Full color saturation
001: 75% of full saturation
010: 50% of full saturation
011: 37.5% of full saturation
100: 25% of full saturation
101: 150% of full saturation
110: Black and white
Bit 2:0 Specify color saturation attenuation at high luminance (linearly increasing attenuation from no
attenuation to monochrome at luminance of 224).
000: No attenuation.
001: Attenuation starts at luminance of 216.
010: Attenuation starts at luminance of 208.
011: Attenuation starts at luminance of 192.
100: Attenuation starts at luminance of 160.
101: Attenuation starts at luminance of 96.
Do u read in my post about series MT9V... Micron
Table and Register for VGA series MT9 Micron
post#8
http://www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=159467&start=105
[ This Message was edited by: brazuka on 2008-03-02 19:42 ] |
brazzuka's
Joined: Nov 14, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: South World-Antartida-Sweden
PM, WWW
|
[quote]
On 2008-03-02 20:05:03, milan91 wrote:
fight, fight, fight
joma, number1 chill
No figth!!! Milan Milan
| |
|
Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi
|
Posted: 2008-03-01 14:03
