| Author |
N82 vs k850.......(some new good pics [800 x 600]) |
mofei1
Joined: Dec 16, 2005
Posts: 26
PM |
On 2008-01-25 22:43:41, plankgatan wrote:
think the 4 first pics looks quite blurry...impressed ???.....no way man, sorry..
the details is quite bad on this N82-pics, maybe you had "bad luck" or something 
here i think how details should look;
http://img169.imageshack.us/img169/7424/dsc00210la3.jpg
-------------------------------------------------------------------
hard to find compare pics between n82 and k850...found this, nothing special i think.
N82
k850
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-01-25 22:01 ]
hehe they look fine to me  ne wayz some more pics 
 |
|
|
paul-d
Joined: Nov 22, 2007
Posts: 20
PM |
Nice F1 car above, hears a bigger version
 |
mofei1
Joined: Dec 16, 2005
Posts: 26
PM |
On 2008-01-25 23:26:33, paul-d wrote:
Nice F1 car above, hears a bigger version
haha, i can drive my one tho |
paul-d
Joined: Nov 22, 2007
Posts: 20
PM |
errrrrrm my user name may say Paul on here but my real name is Fernando |
mofei1
Joined: Dec 16, 2005
Posts: 26
PM |
lol alonso sux hamilton ftw |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
this N82 pics dosent look good.... im not trying to offend you, im just telling what í see.
ps...this last pics you show is with flash...thats a other story....
flash pics taken on short distance ALLWAYS looks good, even with k850, k800, k810, N82, viewty, g800, etc, etc, etc
as you see it allways end up perfect at short range
_________________
I  K850,  W810 &  T29
------------------------------------
____________________________________
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-01-25 22:58 ] |
mofei1
Joined: Dec 16, 2005
Posts: 26
PM |
its kool, i'm not really fussed about the quality of either phones, if i had the k850i, i would be jus as pleased as with the n82. |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
thats the spirit ...cheers...he he
|
mofei1
Joined: Dec 16, 2005
Posts: 26
PM |
mini nokia tripod pretty useless
Casio EX-V7
and of course the N82
 |
mib1800
Joined: Mar 18, 2004
Posts: > 500
PM |
@mofei1
hard to find compare pics between n82 and k850
There are many sites which did exhaustive comparison of both phones. Dont be FOOLED by plankgatan's broken record (which keeps showing the same photos over and over - I bet he has a very hard time finding side-by-side comparison photo in which his worshipped K850 comes out better  )
Here are the many sites which you can find comparison pictures of N82 and K850. On the whole, for those who want to see N82 is still better at taking photos.
http://www.smape.com/en/reviews/nokia/Nokia_N82-prev.html
http://www.gophone.com.tw/rep[....]ntent.jsp?sn=0712240001&jump=7
http://www.phonearena.com/htm[....]son-Q4-2007-review-r_1889.html
http://publish.it168.com/2007/1129/20071129000404.shtml
http://www.gsmarena.com/grand[....]apixel_shootout-review-206.php
http://mobilenet.cz/recenze/c[....]ia-n82-vs.-sony-ericsson-k850i
http://www.planete-nokia.com/phpBB2/index.php?showtopic=50267
|
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
we/i have allready seen most of this compare pics
_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
____________________________________
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-01-26 02:51 ] |
Radiux399
Joined: Sep 06, 2007
Posts: 246
PM |
Could you guys do us all a favor and NOT post pics to esato's servers? It downsamples to 800x600 and uses poor jpeg compression, making everything appear blurry and mushy. Its difficult to compare anything at that low quality. Please downsample to 1024x768 using photoshop or something (not paint!) and then upload to a separate server that doesn't recompress the image. |
mib1800
Joined: Mar 18, 2004
Posts: > 500
PM |
radiux:
I think you should direct this to plankgatan who is the only one who post 10 times shrunken photos of his K850 and ridiculously declare that K850 is better.
Other more serious posters who who have BOTH phones do post side-by-side comparison photos of the same scene in full size.
And if that's not enough, I have posted many websites which have done photo comparisons of these 2 phones. There are hundreds of side by side photos in these reviews. I think there is already more than enough full photos out there for people to make a conclusive judgement
|
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
On 2008-01-26 05:57:09, mib1800 wrote:
radiux:
I think you should direct this to plankgatan who is the only one who post 10 times shrunken photos of his K850 and ridiculously declare that K850 is better.
Other more serious posters who who have BOTH phones do post side-by-side comparison photos of the same scene in full size.
And if that's not enough, I have posted many websites which have done photo comparisons of these 2 phones. There are hundreds of side by side photos in these reviews. I think there is already more than enough full photos out there for people to make a conclusive judgement
if i want to uppload full size pics (which i did yesterday) i do that because i want it myself, not because you say so.
so drop this bullshit...
i get better pics with k850 then N82...N82 sucks BIGTIME when its not good sunshine, (see above).....
sure, if you want wlan and gps..buy n82...otherwise buy k850...it totally rocks....so much more beatiful, so much more classic phone...
n82 is ugly, maybe it fit yourself...he he
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-01-26 10:04 ] |
rickster2kuk
Joined: Jul 14, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Southampton, UK
PM |
Can't we just draw a line on the whole debate.
It's up to individual tastes, some people like the N82 pics, some the k850i.
I almost got a N95 before my k850i but the only thing that really stopped me was the battery life, 1 day is just not good enough. Not sure how better the N82 is, hopefully much better.
Now that's something SE does much better than Nokia on their N series phones. |
|
|
Posted: 2008-01-25 23:11
