| Author |
Post your pictures (and videos) taken with your K770 |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
i still think Sonys CMOS IMX-[011, 018, 020] is absolutley the best cell phones sensors
_________________
I  K850,  W810 &  T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-04-06 22:42 ] |
|
|
milan91
Joined: Jun 04, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Europe
PM |
Sorry but this pictures are not with k800i  K800i is good, but this pics are fake 
Maybe is k800i, but its full edited with some app...
I want to se exif or maybe one full picture 
|
AbuBasim
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2008-04-06 23:38:28, plankgatan wrote:
i still think Sonys CMOS IMX-[011, 018, 020] is absolutley the best cell phones sensors
And I feel exactly the same way about ICX495, Sony's 5 MP CCD digicam sensor used in a few phones in 2006 (i-mobile 902, LG KG920, Gigabyte g-cam).
On 2008-04-07 00:12:42, milan91 wrote:
Sorry but this pictures are not with k800i K800i is good, but this pics are fake
Maybe is k800i, but its full edited with some app...
I want to se exif or maybe one full picture
Of course they are from a K800i and of course they are edited. All professional photographers edit their digital photos. That's the beauty of digital cameras, allowing you to do things with your photos that were very difficult with film unless you had your own photo lab. Just pick up a copy of the magazine Popular Photography if you don't believe this or go to their web site.
The only people who do not edit their digital photos are:
1. Noobs! Because they don't know how...
2. When comparing camera quality, usually SE and Nokia fanboys arguing which camphone is the best!
|
momoki
Joined: Feb 01, 2008
Posts: 197
From: Singapore
PM |
i tink here is not the place for u to put your "edited" photo. we r here to compare the original pic from different phone.
if the pic come out is good, after editing it wil become more better. |
AbuBasim
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2008-04-07 09:00:33, momoki wrote:
i tink here is not the place for u to put your "edited" photo.
No, I agree. But milan91 was complaining that a photographer (davidhelan) at Flickr was posting edited photos on that site. If you're a photographer then your demands would be pretty low if you were happy with the raw photos from a K800i... 
As you say, the only time you post raw, unedited photos is when you just want to show off camera quality. That's doesn't seem to be the point davidhelan is trying to make.
|
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
On 2008-04-07 08:49:43, AbuBasim wrote:
On 2008-04-06 23:38:28, plankgatan wrote:
i still think Sonys CMOS IMX-[011, 018, 020] is absolutley the best cell phones sensors
And I feel exactly the same way about ICX495, Sony's 5 MP CCD digicam sensor used in a few phones in 2006 (i-mobile 902, LG KG920, Gigabyte g-cam).
yes i agree, ICX-sensor is damn cruel. BUT except for the camera i-mobile is a VERY crappy phone. LG KG920 is a much nicer phone though, BUT it still not on the Nordic market, (at least not in the stores  ... KG920 never became a hit worlwide, i think the strange design stop people to buy it.
so the best sensors (who is available on the market) is IMX sensors......
_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-04-07 12:13 ] |
AbuBasim
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2008-04-07 13:08:19, plankgatan wrote:
LG KG920 is a much nicer phone though, BUT it still not on the Nordic market, (at least not in the stores ... KG920 never became a hit worlwide, i think the strange design stop people to buy it.
I think the biggest problem with the KG920 is the price. It's a very nice phone, with a titanium case which makes it very strong but light. One shop here in Muscat still has one piece but the shop keeper is asking almost 550 US dollars for it.
|
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
sorry for off topic
think IMX020 is good enough
(click to enlarge)
_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-04-07 12:59 ] |
milan91
Joined: Jun 04, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Europe
PM |
AbuBasim, ok ok
I want to see pure pics from all phones, and i love to watch pure photos to see what mobile have better camera...
I am not noob, i know how to edit photos but i dont want to do that
[ This Message was edited by: milan91 on 2008-04-07 14:20 ] |
nokialovera
Joined: Nov 03, 2007
Posts: 28
PM |
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/index.php?uid=133182 |
jigonx
Joined: Oct 16, 2007
Posts: 327
PM |
@nokialovera
very nice pictures..sharp and vivid colour!
i don't know why many people here underestimate K770 ~_~
K770 definitely doing very good job here
keep posting dude. |
jigonx
Joined: Oct 16, 2007
Posts: 327
PM |
On 2008-04-07 13:41:08, plankgatan wrote:
sorry for off topic
think IMX020 is good enough
(click to enlarge)
sory mate, IMHO, nothing special about that pic. plain background makes the object look sharp..
some parts a bit over exposed there.
but yes, i agree IMX020 is good |
jigonx
Joined: Oct 16, 2007
Posts: 327
PM |
Random picture
|
jigonx
Joined: Oct 16, 2007
Posts: 327
PM |
indoor low light, flash off
 |
AbuBasim
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2008-04-07 13:17:09, AbuBasim wrote:
I think the biggest problem with the KG920 is the price. It's a very nice phone, with a titanium case which makes it very strong but light. One shop here in Muscat still has one piece but the shop keeper is asking almost 550 US dollars for it.
A correction to my own post: the case is not made out of titanium, just a small part of it, the piece that's bulging out from the phone body housing the camera shutter button. So this makes the reason for LG charging so much money for the phone strange. The build quality is good but the software is worse than i-mobile 902's.
|
|
|
Posted: 2008-04-06 23:38
