Author |
Detailed T610 discussion |
December Joined: Aug 19, 2004 Posts: 27 PM, WWW
|
Definitely not the best, but its good enough for me.
It would be cool if all these parts were to be self-upgradable right? e.g.
- covers
- cameras
- the software
- others
Adding on, as u mentioned earlier, one is able to take some great pictures with it. I totally agree. Most picts look great for thumbnail, and thumbnail-size photos are fun. It can be professional too
[ This Message was edited by: December on 2004-10-30 07:10 ] |
|
BobaFett Joined: Jan 06, 2004 Posts: > 500 From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund) PM, WWW
|
@asterix happy if u are satisfied with the batt @december indeed, the cam is ok on t6x0 series, cos of the better screen of 630 there its the quality nicer, but do fited my needs on both fones.
This message was posted from a T68i |
December Joined: Aug 19, 2004 Posts: 27 PM, WWW
|
referring to the comment -> its nicer and better for T630 due to the screen
does it mean its just looks better, but in actual fact, the quality of the capture is actually the same?
for example, if i were to take a photo with the T610, transfer the photo to the computer and view it on the screen and compare it with the photo taken with the T630 (and transfer it to the computer too), i will see that both the photos are identical.
( assuming that both the cameras are not damaged or do not have any dead ccds etc ) |
BobaFett Joined: Jan 06, 2004 Posts: > 500 From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund) PM, WWW
|
The quality of pics are the same as i see, the better screen is a bit help at the shooting.
This message was posted from a T68i |
Asterix Joined: Aug 19, 2004 Posts: > 500 From: Lima / Peru PM, WWW
|
As @boba said, quality is the same, the only difference is that they look nicer on T630 screen.
But overall quality of pics are ok, you just have to learn how to manage light and shutter, and then you can have some great pics, and if you photoshop them, the results can be sometimes amazing.
T610 Powered |
BobaFett Joined: Jan 06, 2004 Posts: > 500 From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund) PM, WWW
|
Indeed, with a little patience and practise really good pics can be made. So experiment as much as u can to get the best out of it!
This message was posted from a T68i |
Asterix Joined: Aug 19, 2004 Posts: > 500 From: Lima / Peru PM, WWW
|
@boba, any news from ayush?
T610 Powered |
blayv Joined: Oct 24, 2004 Posts: > 500 From: Srbija PM |
But, doesn't 630 have VGA resolution- 4 times more pixels? Shouldn't them pics taken with it be 2x bigger, horizontally and vert when watched on pc?
This message was posted from a T610 |
Asterix Joined: Aug 19, 2004 Posts: > 500 From: Lima / Peru PM, WWW
|
K700 has VGA resolution, not T630. T610 is the base phone and the only different on T630 is the TFT screen and something on the menu, thatīs all, am I right?
T610 Powered |
blayv Joined: Oct 24, 2004 Posts: > 500 From: Srbija PM |
When i was watching phone specs i saw:
T610- 352x288
630- 640x480
K700- 1280x960?
This message was posted from a T610 |
Asterix Joined: Aug 19, 2004 Posts: > 500 From: Lima / Peru PM, WWW
|
lets ask @boba, he has a T630.
T610 Powered |
kooki Joined: Jul 13, 2004 Posts: 381 From: bangalore, india PM |
the t630 cam can be streched to extended (VGA) size but it sucks.
the k700i has a true vga cam but can be extended to 1.3 mp
the s700i is a true 1.13 mp cam |
BobaFett Joined: Jan 06, 2004 Posts: > 500 From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund) PM, WWW
|
Sadly the xxl size in t630 is disappointed. I could never ever make an acceptable pic, even i gave my best.
This message was posted from a T68i |
shyam335 Joined: May 25, 2004 Posts: > 500 From: 127.0.0.1 PM |
Is there any1 here with a 610 with r6c or r7 fw ? Is there xxl option in cam ? Plz clarify
This message was posted from a T610 |
BobaFett Joined: Jan 06, 2004 Posts: > 500 From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund) PM, WWW
|
T610 hasnt got xxl pic size.
This message was posted from a T68i |
|