| Author |
C905 CamDriver Modded |
mauasca
Joined: Oct 04, 2007
Posts: 196
From: Pavia (Italy)
PM, WWW
|
On 2009-09-08 20:44:37, eltoffer wrote:
thanks mikely
@mauasca
i can see the same problem as before your lens seems to be dirty in the pics taken with my driver
[ This Message was edited by: eltoffer on 2009-09-08 19:45 ]
I am sorry,:-(
the lens is not dirty, I clean before of the test;-)
[ This Message was edited by: mauasca on 2009-09-08 22:17 ] S.E.C905_R1FA035_Modded
Satio U1 Black R2KA006 hack O_O
X10i White Android 2.1 Rooted no brand_MW600
|
|
|
anouk82
Joined: Apr 13, 2009
Posts: > 500
From: Athens,Greece
PM |
On 2009-09-08 12:28:14, igica11 wrote:
Firs of all I am not very familiar with modding camdrive but I ask one question.
OK you manage to increase file size of jpg. But I dont understand, why you dont change quantization table in camdrive. As I have seen you use the same quantization table as original camdrive, which is design for lower bits. In my camdrive I change original quantization with jpeg standard quantization q=80( found it http://www.dfrws.org/2008/proceedings/p21-kornblum.pdf ) and I think images are sharper and more precise
[ This Message was edited by: igica11 on 2009-09-08 11:29 ]
can you give us an example?your pics... |
eltoffer
Joined: Nov 01, 2007
Posts: 348
PM |
On 2009-09-08 23:16:12, mauasca wrote:
On 2009-09-08 20:44:37, eltoffer wrote:
thanks mikely
@mauasca
i can see the same problem as before your lens seems to be dirty in the pics taken with my driver
[ This Message was edited by: eltoffer on 2009-09-08 19:45 ]
I am sorry,:-(
the lens is not dirty, I clean before of the test;-)
[ This Message was edited by: mauasca on 2009-09-08 22:17 ]
it really seem so blurry o fuzzy
|
rajac
Joined: Jun 22, 2009
Posts: 76
PM |
DM 3.2 nightshot 2s
 |
wilson123123
Joined: Aug 30, 2009
Posts: 3
From: HK,China
PM, WWW
|
hey rajac~
Even meet you here ~ |
rajac
Joined: Jun 22, 2009
Posts: 76
PM |
@Wilson123123
Hi!Wilson.Nice to meet you here,too.  |
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
On 2009-09-08 13:11:45, igica11 wrote:
OK, if quantization table is not used for normal pictures for what is than used?? Why is quantization table writen in camdrive if it doesnt have any influence on picture quality?? Tnx
I don't know, in K750 and K800 they were for nothing and I don't think that anything has changed for C905. you can change all values to very small numbers like 10 and verify results. in this way quantization tables should simulate very high compression (very low jpeg quality)
|
igica11
Joined: Mar 26, 2009
Posts: 19
PM |
On 2009-09-08 23:26:29, anouk82 wrote:
On 2009-09-08 12:28:14, igica11 wrote:
Firs of all I am not very familiar with modding camdrive but I ask one question.
OK you manage to increase file size of jpg. But I dont understand, why you dont change quantization table in camdrive. As I have seen you use the same quantization table as original camdrive, which is design for lower bits. In my camdrive I change original quantization with jpeg standard quantization q=80( found it http://www.dfrws.org/2008/proceedings/p21-kornblum.pdf ) and I think images are sharper and more precise
[ This Message was edited by: igica11 on 2009-09-08 11:29 ]
can you give us an example?your pics...
Okej you can download my modificated version of camdrive and see yourself. Notice that my camdrive is 96% based on original camdrive (because I dont like too much saturation and unnatural sharpening) and just compresion and exposure are changed-nothing radical. With this camdrive I manage to do 6,45MB picture of grass.
http://www.mediafire.com/?sha[....]a4fc82078ae6c8e04e75f6e8ebb871
bye |
igica11
Joined: Mar 26, 2009
Posts: 19
PM |
On 2009-09-09 13:30:35, Raiderski wrote:
On 2009-09-08 13:11:45, igica11 wrote:
OK, if quantization table is not used for normal pictures for what is than used?? Why is quantization table writen in camdrive if it doesnt have any influence on picture quality?? Tnx
you can change all values to very small numbers like 10 and verify results. in this way quantization tables should simulate very high compression (very low jpeg quality)
I remeber that small numbers in quantization table means better quality
[ This Message was edited by: igica11 on 2009-09-09 17:43 ] |
rajac
Joined: Jun 22, 2009
Posts: 76
PM |
Where's DM? I can't see him for a long time...  |
igica11
Joined: Mar 26, 2009
Posts: 19
PM |
eltoffer colud you please edit my camdrive so I would be able to manual change iso. I Copy-paste some part of your camdrive from yours to mine but my camera always use iso200 indors. I Will use it only for myself and i wont share it further.
mail: smaragd@siol.net If it is very difficul than leave it. Tnx |
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
On 2009-09-09 18:41:31, igica11 wrote:
I remeber that small numbers in quantization table means better quality
right, my mistake
|
eltoffer
Joined: Nov 01, 2007
Posts: 348
PM |
whats your driver and what do you want instead of ????? and which values do you prefer???? i highly recommend 100 200 320 and 400 or 500 but its your choice
|
anouk82
Joined: Apr 13, 2009
Posts: > 500
From: Athens,Greece
PM |
D.M 3.2 (sharpness to 
DM in youe next driver you can use more warm colours,but overal very very good.
[ This Message was edited by: anouk82 on 2009-09-09 22:58 ] |
eltoffer
Joined: Nov 01, 2007
Posts: 348
PM |
well it seems no one prints your photos, if you use too high sharpness the image is ugly trust me i recently printed some vacations pics and these were not that good as you think, but its your choice anyway i felt i should warn you
enjoy your shots
|
|
|
Posted: 2009-09-08 23:16
