| Author |
so who is religous here? |
amnesia
Joined: Jan 15, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Doha, London, Tokyo, Shanghai
PM, WWW
|
on the dot Gigs
|
|
|
solidsingh
Joined: Jan 15, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: india
PM |
@gigs, took me a while to get what jagger meant but what he means is, its easier for a person with no foreskin to be gay because it cant be ripped wen inserted into ********
|
amnesia
Joined: Jan 15, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Doha, London, Tokyo, Shanghai
PM, WWW
|
thats such a messed up opinion.
I wouldn't know if it's 'conveniant' but LOL Islam isn't the only religion to circumsize.
Some people circumsize because they believe it's cleaner.
I mean, are people really stupid on this forum that they come up with the theory that if you are circumsized you are more likely to be Gay. Especially in a religion where homosexual acts is banned.
I'm got another headache coming on.
|
solidsingh
Joined: Jan 15, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: india
PM |
everyone has different opinions
|
Gigs
Joined: Jan 19, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: The planet Snibertron!
PM, WWW
|
lol Solid, thanks for interpreting..
@jagger:
Being gay isn't something that someone chooses because they have a bit of skin lopped off or not. Besides, if it was then that wouldn't account for lesbians. Kinda like saying "If you watch queer eye is it easier to become gay"
|
jagger2k
Joined: Nov 14, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Leicester, UK Phone: IPh
PM |
oh ok, i know this may be a silly question but does it hurt when the cut the tackle off? dont it bleed like hell and what do they use? scalple? sissors?
|
amnesia
Joined: Jan 15, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Doha, London, Tokyo, Shanghai
PM, WWW
|
it's usually done when you are born or at a very early age.
It doesn't hurt because of the injections now (but I imagine it did hurt way back when)
It does bleed but not so much because the foreskin doesn't have so much blood rushing to it.
Or at least I think so.
@solid,
confused are we? He wasn't stating an opinion he was asking a question. An opinion is based on the truth not on a lie.
|
PeterKay
Joined: Jul 08, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: The Ummah
PM, WWW
|
Quote:
|
On 2005-09-29 01:39:32, jagger2k wrote:
oh ok, i know this may be a silly question but does it hurt when the cut the tackle off? dont it bleed like hell and what do they use? scalple? sissors?
|
|
A hindu doctor did my kids 2 weeks ago, no blood and it was so easily done. special tools were used with injections and some medication. child has fully recovered and tickle tackle is in perfect working order 
|
solidsingh
Joined: Jan 15, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: india
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2005-09-29 00:12:56, amnesia wrote:
thats such a messed up opinion.
|
|
Quote:
|
On 2005-09-29 00:16:18, solidsingh wrote:
everyone has different opinions
|
|
im not confused amnesia. are you?
|
jagger2k
Joined: Nov 14, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Leicester, UK Phone: IPh
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2005-09-29 14:31:18, solidsingh wrote:
Quote:
|
On 2005-09-29 00:12:56, amnesia wrote:
thats such a messed up opinion.
|
|
Quote:
|
On 2005-09-29 00:16:18, solidsingh wrote:
everyone has different opinions
|
|
im not confused amnesia. are you?
|
|
am confused.......about my sexuallity, lol not really!! am all straight. the the thing about being circumcised is the child does not even have a choice.
_________________
If anybody wants to swap a psp game for Tony Hawks Underground 2:remix PM me.
[ This Message was edited by: jagger2k on 2005-09-29 14:01 ] |
amnesia
Joined: Jan 15, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Doha, London, Tokyo, Shanghai
PM, WWW
|
Quote:
|
On 2005-09-29 14:31:18, solidsingh wrote:
Quote:
|
On 2005-09-29 00:12:56, amnesia wrote:
thats such a messed up opinion.
|
|
Quote:
|
On 2005-09-29 00:16:18, solidsingh wrote:
everyone has different opinions
|
|
im not confused amnesia. are you?
|
|
...
I'm not are you?
|
BlueQuill
Joined: Jul 29, 2005
Posts: 419
From: India
PM |
Om shaanti om.......
This message was posted from a Nokia |
vanquish
Joined: Mar 20, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Wor Newcastle Phone: V600i
PM, WWW
|
Quote:
|
On 2005-09-28 19:28:33, amnesia wrote:
@vanquish, wasn't there a whole issue of how the Church of England blatantly said that being Gay was unacceptable?
|
|
Oh yes, peterkay, you find that funny.
If you had any idea of the church of england, you would find that priests and funny clothes and insence was not in the Bible in Acts, the beginning of the church. Therefore, they make alot of crap up. Whilst they may be christians, and may go to heaven, theyre views can sometimes be quite forthright.
And when did they say that? Theyre thinking about allowing gay priests! Oh yes ... unnacceptable 
Get your facts straight
[addsig] |
scotsboyuk
Joined: Jun 02, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: UK
PM, WWW
|
As far as I understand it the Church of England is relatively progressive when it comes to accepting homosexuality, certainly when one compares it with the Roman Catholic Church. The Catholic Church doesn't allow women priests nor does it have any sort of measure of acceptance for homosexual priests. The Church of England on the other hand does, I believe there is a gay bishop in fact.
The Anglican Church in America (Anglican being the Church of England as far as I am aware) also has a gay bishop, whether he still is or not I'm not sure.
"I may be drunk my dear woman, but in the morning I will be sober, and you will still be ugly." WSC |
amnesia
Joined: Jan 15, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Doha, London, Tokyo, Shanghai
PM, WWW
|
get my facts straight? I didn't mention any facts vanquish lol.....
I just asked whether or not there was an issue with homosexuality. And there was!
|
|
|
Posted: 2005-09-29 00:07
