Author |
Official SE C901 Cybershot discussion |
wuz-dis Joined: Feb 17, 2009 Posts: 24 PM |
On that photo with girl,
iso200 - great! Will be less soft-blurring.
1\\125 exposure - really great.
Focal length - 4.55
k850/c902 has 5.18
What better?? Does anybody know? |
|
Raiderski Joined: Jul 03, 2006 Posts: > 500 From: Poland, Hell, Mountains PM, WWW
|
it's just wider angle of view, not much important for amateur shooters
|
King9 Joined: Jan 12, 2009 Posts: 53 PM |
think the small difference between different lenses dosent prove anything on cellphones. if you compare "the size" between example k850 and c902 you clearly see c902 comes out on top regrding picturequality and still have smaller lens.
even c905 with its Big lens dosent prove much, it still take quite bad lowlight & indoor pictures (and there you really "need" your Big lens).
c902 has a focal lenght of 5,18mm
c901 --------- || ------- 4,55mm
the second macro picture by c901 is also good i think. (no flash, iso.100, etc). im happy with c901 (especially the flash). hope it comes sson
 |
HxH Joined: Dec 26, 2008 Posts: > 500 From: GMT+7 PM |
Nice Pics King9, Thanks
SONY x Sexy x Sleek x Solid x Stunner x Stylish : Nozomi/Kagura with Love. |
puestadelsol Joined: Mar 29, 2007 Posts: 310 PM |
Is it possible that C901 won't be available in European coutries??? It was announced as a phone for emerging markets, but is no information about it on SonyEricsson's press releaese's page, it isn't exposed on MWC either, according to Mobile-review, and actually nobody saw it on MWC untill now.
[ This Message was edited by: puestadelsol on 2009-02-17 17:46 ] |
Vipera ammodytes Joined: Sep 22, 2004 Posts: > 500 From: Serbia PM |
c903 have the sam s*ity sensor like k850, c902..
c901 have smaller sensor but from what i can see it have better picture quality, no high amount of watering effect like k850 and c902 in low light shots
_________________
[ This Message was edited by: Vipera ammodytes on 2009-02-17 17:35 ] |
Mizzle Joined: Oct 06, 2006 Posts: > 500 PM, WWW
|
The C901 is pretty nice. I actually prefer it over the C903. The latter gets messy sooo quickly.
|
puestadelsol Joined: Mar 29, 2007 Posts: 310 PM |
@ Mizzle
Do you know if the C901 will be available in Europe? |
Mizzle Joined: Oct 06, 2006 Posts: > 500 PM, WWW
|
It will in certain countries.
|
puestadelsol Joined: Mar 29, 2007 Posts: 310 PM |
On 2009-02-17 18:47:42, Mizzle wrote:
It will in certain countries.
Will it be available just in those countries, where is already listed on Sony Ericsson page amongst the phones? In other coutries (where isn't listed on Sony ericsson's page) is there no hope to be available? |
jaguare Joined: Feb 12, 2009 Posts: 12 PM |
think c901,c903 will get it hard against c902 excellent daylight and macro -quality though, otherwise it looks good
|
Mizzle Joined: Oct 06, 2006 Posts: > 500 PM, WWW
|
Here's a camera sample
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=17923
|
Raiderski Joined: Jul 03, 2006 Posts: > 500 From: Poland, Hell, Mountains PM, WWW
|
Mizzle please this is ugliest example I ever saw, can you post something more eatable?
|
Mizzle Joined: Oct 06, 2006 Posts: > 500 PM, WWW
|
Nonetheless, it shows the superb quality.
|
number1 Joined: Sep 12, 2007 Posts: > 500 From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne PM |
It just se shows se found iso 50, quality will drop alot as the iso gets higher.
|
|