Esato

Forum > Sony Ericsson / Sony > Software, Firmware and Drivers > N1 C702 & C510 camdrivers

Previous  123 ... 789 ... 192021  Next
Author N1 C702 & C510 camdrivers
gtr83
C905 Black
Joined: Sep 27, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: Indonesia
PM
Posted: 2008-12-10 17:44
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
@number1: really appreciate everything you've done.
Nokia 3520 > 6600 > W800i > W890i > C702 > C905 > BB 9500 > Samsung INNOV8
Amras
C702 Speed Black
Joined: Jun 20, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Bandung, Indonesia
PM, WWW
Posted: 2008-12-11 19:41
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
this is what N1 3.2 can do in twilight:






this one is just a macro snapshot.




_________________
Esato is NOT comfortable anymore for anyone to stand opinions! >> READ, AND THINK.

[ This Message was edited by: Amras on 2008-12-11 18:42 ]
CHEMASKBG
Model not set
Joined: Dec 13, 2008
Posts: 1
PM
Posted: 2008-12-13 22:14
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Is it possible to make an option for the ledflashlight? I only want the ledlight to flash not light up my house before I take the picture.
_LawmaN_
K810 Blue
Joined: Apr 23, 2006
Posts: 5
PM
Posted: 2008-12-17 01:29
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
without a light, the camera won't see anything to focus on.
Mr.Kája
T300
Joined: Mar 22, 2007
Posts: 180
PM
Posted: 2008-12-21 04:02
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
I'm glad for modding c702 camdriver...maybe it's pity, that N1 is almost alone Maybe I will have c702, who knows...so I can't test it now, but I would like, if somebody can show any videos from N1 camdriver and maybe full quality photos.

And to the driver, how I said, I haven't test it, but what I saw at first page, sharpness is higher in almost cases...maybe, lower values could help (this camera has problem with noise)...especially at night. Maybe you tried it. Just suggestion.

Finally, thanks for your work


[ This Message was edited by: Mr.Kája on 2008-12-21 03:03 ]
number1
P1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM
Posted: 2008-12-21 15:47
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
I'm not done yet still trying to find values for colour correction, then thats the furest it will go as a simple driver, the sharpness values are balanced, i tryed most of them, 00 to flat, 01 & 02 & 03 made the noise standard out more as the pixel errors where bigger in size, 04 & 05 the pixel errors are alot smaller in size but standard out more slighty grainy but pics are alot sharper tad more grainyness than 00 the best balance of sharpness & noise, 06 the pics looked smeary, 07 & 08 are just far to grainy and not practial for auto mode, document uses 07 in my driver as appossed to 08 in the standard driver it's just as sharp but a little less grainy.
yw88
Model not set
Joined: Sep 04, 2008
Posts: 14
PM
Posted: 2008-12-23 10:41
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
here is my c702 wif N1



here is my fren k810 wif original software.....



why my c702 pic so blur n many dots......while my fren k810 much more clear than mine......is it this normal???or my c702 got problem???
gtr83
C905 Black
Joined: Sep 27, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: Indonesia
PM
Posted: 2008-12-23 16:16
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
@yw88

Not really, the C702 cam needs a real lot of light, I sometimes use the LED even if the room is not completely dark (but only on macro shots).
Nokia 3520 > 6600 > W800i > W890i > C702 > C905 > BB 9500 > Samsung INNOV8
number1
P1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM
Posted: 2008-12-23 17:14
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
The C702 uses longer exposure time than the k810 due to it's smaller aperture in lower light longer exposure time is need, so you need to be more still to avoid blurring, the noise is because the k810 & c702 post-process there photos differently the C702 doesn't really have very power-ful post-process like the k810 does, the advantage of the more powerful post-processing is less noise and cleaner pics, the disadvantage is more detail is lost heres some examples, C702 iso 250 .

straight from cam untouched
http://www.4shared.com/file/76048555/30df258/DSC00039.html

Processed in neatimage
http://www.4shared.com/file/7[....]251ad6d/DSC00039_filtered.html
Sator1973
Xperia X10 Black
Joined: Jun 20, 2006
Posts: 242
From: Netherlands
PM, WWW
Posted: 2008-12-23 18:01
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
I would rather have some more noise in a picture than less detail. Like in music I prefer a clear sound with some noise over a muflled sound without noise.
My C702 with N1's driver makes great close-ups, even in low light. Offcourse there will be noise in full size photos, but if you resize the photos to for instance screen size, much of the noise will disappear, even without more processing.
When is SE gonna learn that we don't need more megapixels but bigger lenses and sensors.
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam
ignaciotex
Model not set
Joined: Dec 17, 2008
Posts: 15
PM
Posted: 2008-12-23 18:43
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
How about night pictures of people with number1 camdriver? For example when you go clubbing and want to take some pics with your friends.

I used to have a w810, the night mode made big difference at the time of taking night picts, they weren't good but at least decent.
Now I have c702 with R3DA029, I think that twilight portrait actually makes worse pics at night that without selecting it. I think that w810 night mode actually has a slower shutter speed, you have to be carefull not to shake it but it worked.
Will that improve with N1 camdriver, will twilight work similar to night mode?
How about daylight pics, I think they are very good with the original camdriver.

Thanks.
number1
P1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM
Posted: 2008-12-23 19:31
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
I think the W810i's night mode is 1/4 shutter but it has a bigger aperture than the C702, all my drivers shutter speeds & iso's are listed in the first post, with the C702 on twlight portrait you have to manually boost the exposure time other wise it's too dark, +0.7 normally does ths job so thats 1/3 shutter iso 500.
Lightspeed_x
Sony Xperia Z1
Joined: Mar 03, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: Dominican Republic
PM
Posted: 2008-12-23 20:25
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Thanks for the tip Number1!... i noticed that twilight portrait/landscape pictures came out a bit darker too, now i will try boosting EV as you suggest... By the way, thank you very much for this camdriver, it really makes a difference in my C702 ( on R3BA035, so i cant wait to see what it can do with more recent firmware )
gtr83
C905 Black
Joined: Sep 27, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: Indonesia
PM
Posted: 2008-12-23 22:45
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
I usually set it to +0.3 only because I think more than that would overexpose the pics, but thanks for the tip number1 gonna try it soon.
Nokia 3520 > 6600 > W800i > W890i > C702 > C905 > BB 9500 > Samsung INNOV8
gtr83
C905 Black
Joined: Sep 27, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: Indonesia
PM
Posted: 2008-12-23 22:59
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
I just noticed this morning that whenever I take pics with Twilight Landscape mode on 3.2 n1, the flash always burns the pic (eV is on +7 like number1 said). Any ideas of what caused this?

I only noticed this now because I never use Twilight Landscape/Portrait mode before; I always use either Document or Auto.
Nokia 3520 > 6600 > W800i > W890i > C702 > C905 > BB 9500 > Samsung INNOV8
Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi
Previous  123 ... 789 ... 192021  Next
Goto page:
Lock this Topic Move this Topic Delete this Topic