| Author |
Raider camera driver for K790, K800 and K810 (v6.6.5) |
jokamaciek
Joined: Feb 28, 2008
Posts: 102
From: Poland
PM |
easier is to turn EM or SEM on 
T300->T610->E398->K700->MPx200->3xK750->N70->K800 + PSP 2004 3.93 M33 + PS3 40GB  |
|
|
hfmls
Joined: Mar 17, 2008
Posts: 489
PM |
or that i honestly use all the time EM. and for beach or so(fast shutter pics) like all auto and iso100, maybe high color saturation
[ This Message was edited by: hfmls on 2008-07-29 17:24 ] |
tolyo
Joined: Mar 19, 2008
Posts: 120
From: Turkey
PM |
On 2008-07-29 16:05:09, jokamaciek wrote:
tolyo instead of big ISO use logner shutter speed
flash on! shutter speed It does not influence... |
hfmls
Joined: Mar 17, 2008
Posts: 489
PM |
of course it does ... the long the shutter speed, more detail you have in picture ( if you don't move and focus is good of course) but i never use high iso, only 100..and sometimes 200.
use EM with flash when taking portraits. flash gives light, EM gives the rest... detail and quality. if EM thinks picture result is gonna be too dark, EM makes shutter long. |
YG2008
Joined: Jun 06, 2008
Posts: 6
PM |
On 2008-07-29 01:49:25, hfmls wrote:
ok guys, tell me what do you think about these
the pictures was resized, can't tell any differences. Any originals? |
hfmls
Joined: Mar 17, 2008
Posts: 489
PM |
that's ok, it doesn't matter allready checked it out. 2mp gets more detail. |
hfmls
Joined: Mar 17, 2008
Posts: 489
PM |
please tell me your opinion guys.
doing some tests.
EM with macro, no flash
4 pictures. 2mp vs 3mp
2MP
3MP
2MP
3MP
[ This Message was edited by: hfmls on 2008-07-30 01:08 ] |
Futura2000
Joined: Nov 20, 2007
Posts: 13
PM |
just started using this driver and im very impressed with it this may be just a silly question tho how do you turn EM on and SEM on |
milan91
Joined: Jun 04, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Europe
PM |
Put EV on 0.7 or 1.0 and value 1 for SEM, value 2 for EM  Just read txt with camdriver
[ This Message was edited by: milan91 on 2008-07-30 02:05 ] |
wickedsick
Joined: Aug 16, 2007
Posts: 161
PM |
On 2008-07-29 03:20:18, hfmls wrote:
well i have to disagree.... because some pictures that "didn't need" that much size came out like 760 770 kb.... after i change that code. all come out 850 and up...and i can see clearly better quality.
[ This Message was edited by: hfmls on 2008-07-29 02:25 ]
Check the brightness of those pictures. Different brightness/contrast level will affect the detail of the pictures as well as size of the pictures. |
deadman4168
Joined: Jul 24, 2007
Posts: 64
PM |
also the content of the pics...they make a lot of difference in size.... |
butiliero
Joined: Feb 19, 2008
Posts: 16
PM |
I tried hfmls' code, since I was curious and thought that compression artifacts were too high. There are a couple of things that I noticed.
First on same quality settings (91%) hfmls files are bigger, I suppose because of the code that reduce quality a bit less that Raider's.
Second when in 3MP the quality increase in terms of artifacts is not perceivable within hfmls' standard and fine settings. This means that when in 3MP mode 91% is close to the maximum achievable with the 900k buffer.
My question is, whatever the code, if I edit a 91% image with say xnview and apply the reduce noise filter, save the image at 91% quality and reopen it, the artifacts are no more there. This means that even at 91% the image could be compressed with a higher overall visual quality, isn't it? Is it possible to intervene on this aspect of the driver?
Another question for Raider, did you have a look on that issue that image stabilization kills shutter speed manual setting?
Btw I renew my congrats for this great driver, it makes the difference! |
wickedsick
Joined: Aug 16, 2007
Posts: 161
PM |
On 2008-07-30 12:03:18, butiliero wrote:
I tried hfmls' code, since I was curious and thought that compression artifacts were too high. There are a couple of things that I noticed.
First on same quality settings (91%) hfmls files are bigger, I suppose because of the code that reduce quality a bit less that Raider's.
.....
Another question for Raider, did you have a look on that issue that image stabilization kills shutter speed manual setting?
Btw I renew my congrats for this great driver, it makes the difference!
Hanging around with artifacts. It is a big problem and cannot deal with by only updating the driver. We must remember that the software used for taking pictures on K800i is basically not good. Hope there will be genius who can create a new camera complier by java or elf. Maybe I am wrong again
I guess I can answer for Raiderski. His answer will be like this: Yes I do. I thought about this since I started modding k750/w800 drivers. That why after testing a lots, I chose 91% as the best value for k800i.
[ This Message was edited by: wickedsick on 2008-07-30 13:49 ] |
hfmls
Joined: Mar 17, 2008
Posts: 489
PM |
i'm using now compresion at 100%
MIN 870
AVG 900
MAX 910
all good here now. |
kmzoltan
Joined: Apr 02, 2007
Posts: 58
PM |
COMPRESSION 100% at what resolution 2 or 3 mp?
|
|
|
Posted: 2008-07-29 18:18
