| Author |
Raider camera driver for K790, K800 and K810 (v6.6.5) |
hfmls
Joined: Mar 17, 2008
Posts: 489
PM |
raider, ok.
the only thing i know is that, with that code, all my pictures are better, with more size, true, but better. no more watered pictures.
thanks to your driver though.
what about using 2mp to achieve 900kb
(in my opininion, i don't need pictures so big, 3mp, how can i get 2mp pictures to get almost no compression at all and 900kb) ???
[ This Message was edited by: hfmls on 2008-07-29 00:39 ] |
|
|
hfmls
Joined: Mar 17, 2008
Posts: 489
PM |
ok guys, tell me what do you think about these
2MP 893KB
3MP 864KB
2MP 791KB
3MP 837KB
2MP 790KB
3MP 901KB
AND LAST ONE:
1MB 834kb
2MB 863kb
3MB 822kb
remember esato forum takes much quality from pics
[ This Message was edited by: hfmls on 2008-07-29 01:42 ] |
milan91
Joined: Jun 04, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Europe
PM |
Pfff... With some old camdriver i made pic with 910KB, i want to see some pic with ~950KB
|
wickedsick
Joined: Aug 16, 2007
Posts: 161
PM |
On 2008-07-29 01:04:51, Raiderski wrote:
JQ_FINE= $s5 64; // 100% max jpeg quality for fine
I tried to explain how jpeg creation process looks like in SE phones and everytime this was pointless. silly but after 2 years of modding and after a lot of posts about compression people still can't understand why using 100% quality in camdriver is nonsense... one more time... nonsense
Agreed. Pointless. |
hfmls
Joined: Mar 17, 2008
Posts: 489
PM |
well i have to disagree.... because some pictures that "didn't need" that much size came out like 760 770 kb.... after i change that code. all come out 850 and up...and i can see clearly better quality.
so why da hell are you saying that's pointless?
i'm not "saying" just for fun. i'm saying because i have the pictures ........right ....
geez...
please answer these. everybody said pictures will be better if there's no compression at all, if limit in k800i is like 910kb or so... if we use 2MB pictures and "force" it to 910kb, pictures will be better...(like the pics i'm taking right now)
....i once took a picture with 1.5mb size, and i must say it was perfect, dunno why, or how, but i did...
i do't need the full 3mp and get 910kb....if i can use 2mp and get 910kb pictures, it would be awsome ....
more quality for sure..any idea how to do this ? i can do it in original camdriver, but i don't know how to do it in this one... it says in camdriver0.dat that if i change the values in that part (the code similar to original camdriver), it will be pointless ....dunno why...
but can anybody...explain please? how to do it, why not to do it.....anyway.
thank you for great driver.
[ This Message was edited by: hfmls on 2008-07-29 02:25 ] |
Goldmen
Joined: Oct 07, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Bulgaria
PM, WWW
|
Some JPEG info:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JPEG |
hfmls
Joined: Mar 17, 2008
Posts: 489
PM |
ok, clearly for me the idea of
3mp size limit 900 compression 100
and
2mp size limit 900 compression 100
i prefer the second, can anybody help me to check this? to do this pls ? |
Arfi-Gorgona
Joined: Jul 17, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: greece
PM |
For me ill agree with Raid,do you really think that the moders didnt check that already?If it was an improovment then im sure that all the modders would have including that in their drivers.
To tell you the truth i saw no improovment from your photos.in fact they are worse than the photos i saw in other pages,try to take photos in daylight,like the flower i saw on the other page.If you want to check the quality you must 1st take pictures that are able to show it.
Zhto h Arfes-gorgones |
hfmls
Joined: Mar 17, 2008
Posts: 489
PM |
flowers are "easy" to stay ok ...to make good pictures....
i use simple objects.... ok, still i'm gonna continue to use that code change that i previous wrote, for me, pictures are better. thank you anyway. |
kmzoltan
Joined: Apr 02, 2007
Posts: 58
PM |
hfmls
you've had perfect right with the buffer size,it s in the FS not main
i we found it.thanks man
i we had in mind the following thing:edit fs and then flash it to the phone,and guess what...when i try to flash it after 5 or 6 blocks it gives me an error X-( damn
[ This Message was edited by: kmzoltan on 2008-07-29 10:23 ] |
640kenough
Joined: Jul 18, 2008
Posts: 42
From: Moldova
PM |
flowers won't show you noticeable difference in the pix quality.
try totake a shot of a small celled grid in perspective or smth
[ This Message was edited by: 640kenough on 2008-07-29 11:24 ] |
tolyo
Joined: Mar 19, 2008
Posts: 120
From: Turkey
PM |
raider 6.3.3 macro
raider 6.3.3 iso 400
 |
jokamaciek
Joined: Feb 28, 2008
Posts: 102
From: Poland
PM |
tolyo instead of big ISO use logner shutter speed
T300->T610->E398->K700->MPx200->3xK750->N70->K800 + PSP 2004 3.93 M33 + PS3 40GB  |
recl
Joined: Nov 25, 2007
Posts: 251
From: Romania
PM |
what's best slow/fast SS with flash pics? and what values? |
hfmls
Joined: Mar 17, 2008
Posts: 489
PM |
depends in light condition. inside house, maybe hald of second or 1 second.
low light condition 2 seconds. iso100 perhaps.
good light condition just use auto and iso 100 |
|
|
Posted: 2008-07-29 01:35
