| Author |
Raider camera driver for K790, K800 and K810 (v6.6.5) |
sacirxposed
Joined: Nov 22, 2007
Posts: 168
From: Montenegro
PM |
xGothico, nice pictures 
http://www.flickr.com/photos/shallemne/ | |
|
hfmls
Joined: Mar 17, 2008
Posts: 489
PM |
flash and macro works ok here. |
hfmls
Joined: Mar 17, 2008
Posts: 489
PM |
took some pictures with k800 with 6.3.3 driver, now flashed it to k810...gonna check take some new pictures and post the differences. |
hfmls
Joined: Mar 17, 2008
Posts: 489
PM |
FOUND WHERE TO EDIT THE BUFFER SIZE, EDITED THE FW FILE, GONNA TRY TO UPLOAD IT NOW, BUT IT WOULD BE EASIER IF ANYONE TEACHED ME TO MAKE PATCHES PLEASE.
[ This Message was edited by: hfmls on 2008-07-28 15:51 ] |
Goldmen
Joined: Oct 07, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Bulgaria
PM, WWW
|
On 2008-07-28 16:50:38, hfmls wrote:
FOUND WHERE TO EDIT THE BUFFER SIZE, EDITED THE FW FILE
You know where,I hope you know how? 
It will be great if work!
Waiting for good news!
Good luck! |
hfmls
Joined: Mar 17, 2008
Posts: 489
PM |
ok, made a patch, now i'm using it, but i don't know if it's working, how do i see if there's any compression in pictures i'm taken ?
[ This Message was edited by: hfmls on 2008-07-28 18:01 ] |
hfmls
Joined: Mar 17, 2008
Posts: 489
PM |
help pls |
hfmls
Joined: Mar 17, 2008
Posts: 489
PM |
try this guys:
;K800 SW-R8BF003
;900k to 1.5mb
;(c) hfmls
;900k to 1.5mb
+44020000
00036450: 44424241303B092F2F20393030204B42 3136453336303B2E2F2F20312E354D42
00036490: 73697A655F353D44424241303B092F2F 73697A655F353D3136453336303B2E2F
000364A0: 20393030204B42206275666665722066 2F20312E354D42206275666665722066 |
hfmls
Joined: Mar 17, 2008
Posts: 489
PM |
how can i try to push the camera to the limits? like to take pictures with big size ?! help me out here guys to check if this is working.
is there any software that tells me if my pictures has compression?
IT'S NOT POSSIBLE TO PATCH FS, ONLY MAIN.
SO...I GUESS IT'S NOT WORKING.
THE ONLY WAY IS TO EDIT FS FILE, BUT EVERYTIME I TRY THIS, XS++ WON'T LET ME FLASH IT WITH EDITED FS FIRMWARE
[ This Message was edited by: hfmls on 2008-07-28 19:02 ] |
kmzoltan
Joined: Apr 02, 2007
Posts: 58
PM |
hfmls
i apreciate a lot your try,but we should let experts to see if its possible,because it could happen like raiderski said that the limitation is not in the main but in the camera module,then we can t do nothing,but let s hope for the best. |
hfmls
Joined: Mar 17, 2008
Posts: 489
PM |
limitation is in FS .... you can check it yourself ...
|
hfmls
Joined: Mar 17, 2008
Posts: 489
PM |
DO THIS:
JQ_NORMAL= $s5 50;
JQ_FINE= $s5 5b;
JQ_BESTP= 59;
and replase with
JQ_NORMAL= $s5 5b; // 91% max jpeg quality for normal
JQ_FINE= $s5 64; // 100% max jpeg quality for fine
JQ_BESTP= 5a; // 90% max jpeg quality for BestPic
Also find
// ====================================== kompresja jpeg
JMIN= #SET(15,!1) #SET(16,!0);
JMAX= #SET(13,!1) #SET(14,!0);
JAVG= #SET(17,!1) #SET(18,!0);
seq_set_prop_5=
$s0 %0
$c0 02 #JQ_NORMAL #JMIN(00,0a) #JMAX(00,96) #JAVG(00,37) $cl
$c0 03 #JQ_FINE #JMIN(00,0a) #JMAX(00,96) #JAVG(00,50) $cl
$c0 04 #JQ_NORMAL #JMIN(00,3c) #JMAX(01,90) #JAVG(00,c8) $cl
$c0 05 #JQ_FINE #JMIN(00,96) #JMAX(01,90) #JAVG(01,2c) $cl
$c0 06 #JQ_NORMAL #JMIN(00,96) #JMAX(02,58) #JAVG(01,90) $cl
$c0 07 #JQ_FINE #JMIN(01,90) #JMAX(02,58) #JAVG(01,f4) $cl
$b0 00 1 7
$c0 00 #JQ_NORMAL #JMIN(01,90) #JMAX(03,20) #JAVG(02,58) // dla 00/08
$cl #JQ_FINE #JMIN(02,58) #JMAX(03,84) #JAVG(03,20) // dla 01/09
$cx
$cx $cx $cx $cx $cx $cx
#SET(19,$w5);
and replase with
// ====================================== kompresja jpeg
JMIN= #SET(15,!1) #SET(16,!0);
JMAX= #SET(13,!1) #SET(14,!0);
JAVG= #SET(17,!1) #SET(18,!0);
seq_set_prop_5=
$s0 %0
$c0 02 #JQ_NORMAL #JMIN(00,0b) #JMAX(00,96) #JAVG(00,37) $cl
$c0 03 #JQ_FINE #JMIN(00,D2) #JMAX(01,a4) #JAVG(01,40) $cl
$c0 04 #JQ_NORMAL #JMIN(00,3c) #JMAX(01,90) #JAVG(00,c8) $cl
$c0 05 #JQ_FINE #JMIN(03,02) #JMAX(03,84) #JAVG(03,34) $cl
$c0 06 #JQ_NORMAL #JMIN(00,96) #JMAX(02,58) #JAVG(01,90) $cl
$c0 07 #JQ_FINE #JMIN(03,25) #JMAX(03,84) #JAVG(03,4D) $cl
$b0 00 1 7
$c0 00 #JQ_NORMAL #JMIN(02,58) #JMAX(03,84) #JAVG(03,20) // dla 00/08
$cl #JQ_FINE #JMIN(03,28) #JMAX(03,84) #JAVG(03,57) // dla 01/09
$cx
$cx $cx $cx $cx $cx $cx
#SET(19,$w5);
ALL I CAN SAY IS THAT I REALLY SEE IMPROVEMENTS IN PICTURES TAKEN  NO MORE 600 OR 700K PICTURES. ONLY 860 AND UP.
really good till i find a way to edit FS firmware, so i can change 900k limit to 1.5mb
[ This Message was edited by: hfmls on 2008-07-28 22:51 ] |
recl
Joined: Nov 25, 2007
Posts: 251
From: Romania
PM |
besides the size of the pic..are there any changes in the quality?? |
hfmls
Joined: Mar 17, 2008
Posts: 489
PM |
of course, because like 70% of the pictures we take, goes to 700..800 kb... with those settings they go up to 800..850..900.... so, less compression, more quality. |
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
JQ_FINE= $s5 64; // 100% max jpeg quality for fine
I tried to explain how jpeg creation process looks like in SE phones and everytime this was pointless. silly but after 2 years of modding and after a lot of posts about compression people still can't understand why using 100% quality in camdriver is nonsense... one more time... nonsense
| |
|
Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi
|
Posted: 2008-07-28 15:49
