Welcome to Esato.com

News Articles:

Technical details:
• Acer beTouch E140
• Samsung 4G LTE
• Samsung Ativ S
• Samsung Champ Neo Duos GT-C3262
• Samsung Galaxy Ace Plus
• Samsung Galaxy Beam
• Samsung Galaxy Fame
• Samsung Galaxy Fame Duos
• Samsung Galaxy Grand GT-I9080
• Samsung Galaxy Grand GT-I9082
• Samsung Galaxy Music
• Samsung Galaxy Music Dual
• Samsung Galaxy Nexus
• Samsung Galaxy Note
• Samsung Galaxy Note II
• Samsung Galaxy Pocket
• Samsung Galaxy Premier
• Samsung Galaxy R I9103
• Samsung Galaxy S Advance
• Samsung Galaxy S Duos S7562
• Samsung Galaxy S II
• Samsung Galaxy S II LTE
• Samsung Galaxy S II Plus
• Samsung Galaxy S II WiMAX ISW11SC
• Samsung Galaxy S III
• Samsung Galaxy S III Mini
• Samsung Galaxy S4
• Samsung Galaxy W
• Samsung Galaxy Xcover GT-S5690
• Samsung Galaxy Xcover II
• Samsung Galaxy Y Duos
• Samsung Galaxy Y Pro
• Samsung Galaxy Y Pro Duos
• Samsung Galaxy Young
• Samsung Galaxy Young Duos
• Samsung Omnia W
• Samsung Rex 60
• Samsung Rex 70
• Samsung Rex 80
• Samsung Rex 90
• Samsung Star 3
• Samsung Star 3 DUOS
• Samsung T-mobile Sidekick 4G
• Samsung Wave 3
• Samsung Wave M
• Samsung Wave Y S5380

From the forum:

Samsung files antitrust complain against MS

Click to view updated thread with images

Posted by difenbaker
Samsung files antitrust complain in Android patent deal with Microsoft

By Usama Jawad @@WPLover96
· 39 minutes ago 2

Samsung has initiated a new tactic in the ongoing court dispute related to the violation of its contract with Microsoft, claiming that after the Redmond-based company's acquisition of Nokia's smartphone business, their former partnership with the company should be considered invalid as it could transgress US antitrust law.

According to Reuters, Samsung agreed to pay Microsoft Android patent license fees in 2011, but under the condition that if Samsung were to sell a specific number of Windows Phones, then Microsoft would decrease Android royalty payments. But that obviously didn't happen, with Samsung selling only one major Windows Phone series, the Samsung ATIV S lineup, which did not gain enough traction among consumers.

Samsung previously paid a royalty fee of $1 billion last year as a result of this undertaking, however Microsoft filed the lawsuit earlier this year claiming that Samsung has violated its contract and consequently owned them $6.9 million in back interest.

Samsung is now arguing that since Microsoft acquired Nokia's smartphone division, the company has become a contender to Samsung's own hardware division which subsequently means that Samsung can no longer share confidential information without breaching US antitrust laws.

Samsung stated in it's filing that,

“Before Microsoft’s merger with Nokia DSB, these provisions between Microsoft, an input supplier, and Samsung, a downstream seller, comported with United States antitrust laws, after the Nokia DSB Merger, the agreements, now between competitors, invite charges of collusion. No reasonable business would knowingly undertake the risk of contractually obligating itself to coordinate and collaborate with a competitor—particularly, as here, with respect to setting third-party incentives and controlling the ‘out of box’ experience of a competitor’s products.”

Furthermore, Samsung has not only asked the court to dismiss Microsoft's claims but also to compensate Samsung's damages for "Microsoft's breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing" after the Nokia acquisition.

However Microsoft is still confident of its position in the case with a spokesperson from Redmond saying that “[the company] is confident that our case is strong and that we will be successful.”


Samsung calls Microsoft a direct hardware competitor, refuses to pay Android royalties


Click to view updated thread with images

© Esato.com - From the Esato mobile phone discussion forum