Welcome to Esato.com



News Articles:

Technical details:
• Acer beTouch E140
• Ericsson R380
• Ericsson R520
• Ericsson R600
• Ericsson T29s
• Ericsson T39
• Ericsson T60d
• Samsung 4G LTE
• Samsung Ativ S
• Samsung Champ Neo Duos GT-C3262
• Samsung Galaxy Ace Plus
• Samsung Galaxy Beam
• Samsung Galaxy Fame
• Samsung Galaxy Fame Duos
• Samsung Galaxy Grand GT-I9080
• Samsung Galaxy Grand GT-I9082
• Samsung Galaxy Music
• Samsung Galaxy Music Dual
• Samsung Galaxy Nexus
• Samsung Galaxy Note
• Samsung Galaxy Note II
• Samsung Galaxy Pocket
• Samsung Galaxy Premier
• Samsung Galaxy R I9103
• Samsung Galaxy S Advance
• Samsung Galaxy S Duos S7562
• Samsung Galaxy S II
• Samsung Galaxy S II LTE
• Samsung Galaxy S II Plus
• Samsung Galaxy S II WiMAX ISW11SC
• Samsung Galaxy S III
• Samsung Galaxy S III Mini
• Samsung Galaxy S4
• Samsung Galaxy W
• Samsung Galaxy Xcover GT-S5690
• Samsung Galaxy Xcover II
• Samsung Galaxy Y Duos
• Samsung Galaxy Y Pro
• Samsung Galaxy Y Pro Duos
• Samsung Galaxy Young
• Samsung Galaxy Young Duos
• Samsung Omnia W
• Samsung Rex 60
• Samsung Rex 70
• Samsung Rex 80
• Samsung Rex 90
• Samsung Star 3
• Samsung Star 3 DUOS
• Samsung T-mobile Sidekick 4G
• Samsung Wave 3
• Samsung Wave M
• Samsung Wave Y S5380

Now Ericsson Joins the Litigation-Crazed Party By Suing Samsung


Click to view updated thread with images




Posted by julias
I’m not sure whether it’s ‘cool’ to sue Samsung at the moment or something, but it seems Ericsson thinks so. It’s just filed a lawsuit against Samsung for yet more patent infringement. It seems Samsung’s fighting on all fronts right now.

Apparently, Samsung failed to renew its licensing agreement for Ericsson’s ‘essential’ wireless patents, meaning every Samsung phone infringes, and maybe many other devices too. For what it’s worth, Samsung’s basically said Ericsson has jacked up the rent and is demanding way too much money for use of said patents.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-20521643


Posted by goldenface
They still have to be paid for regardless of the price. Samsung doesn't get to dictate how much other peoples patents are worth.

I think people are getting tired of all this litigation - it's all very repetitive.

Posted by worf1000
Samsung need to stop to copy from other companies.

Last time even Rambus sues Samsung and Qualcom sues Samsung years ago Samsung need really stop with stealing technology from others and than copy them.

And many more companies going hate Samsung for their copycat products from LC/Oled CPU RAM LTE/3G name it all stolen technology and claim by Samsung self.

I never buy a Samsung product.
Well done Ericsson and Apple, you have balls i respect that.

Posted by etaab
As are the courts, which is why recently i just forget which case it was, Motorola's i think, the court said something along the lines of they had a point in the past, but now it would be hard for others to not abuse such a patent since its just a prerequisite of the technology.

Which id like to happen more often.

Posted by worf1000

On 2012-12-02 21:13:13, goldenface wrote:
They still have to be paid for regardless of the price. Samsung doesn't get to dictate how much other peoples patents are worth.

I think people are getting tired of all this litigation - it's all very repetitive.



No it's not, people get sick that Samsung always steal technology.
The last 10 a 15 years Samsung has nothing and now they got everything from other companies like Sony/Ericsson/Nokia/Sharp/Rambus/Qualcom/Western Digital (HDD/SSD) and Apple.

Very repetitive right?

Posted by Tsepz_GP
@ Samsung being a "copy cat" by that logic EVERY company is a "copy cat" looking at how many lawsuits are going on between all these companies in the industry, this thread is going to get entertaining, i can see it already

Posted by Supa_Fly
So this would seem Ericsson LB has a valid patent dispute. Samsung could've renegotiated the patent licensing pricing, doesn't seem they even bothered to try, and could've brought this to the courts attention before litigation began; or an arbitrator on the matter. None was attempted by Samsung.

I'm more curious how this will affect Nokia's dispute against Apple with their essential patents case of technology.

Either way Samsung may win this due to the increase on pricing and set a standard to be made about pricing costs of essential patents that MUST be licensed and not increase.


Click to view updated thread with images


© Esato.com - From the Esato mobile phone discussion forum