| Author |
K850 VS N82: What's better? |
buntoo
Joined: Apr 13, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Pakistan (SGSII)
PM |
SE is for people who love technology
Nokia for school girls/boys & monkeys 
K850i isn't slower... Well we suppose for a moment that it is a bit slower than the previous K-series... even then it is many times faster than those nokia shoddy handsets specially the symbian ones.
N82 GPS is nothing but a joke...
K850i does all which a person need.
[addsig] | |
|
Coquito
Joined: Mar 28, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Moca, Rep.Dom
PM, WWW
|
@bavlondon2: Is not a joke, I m only talking from my experience.
@Dogman: I dont think my N95 has nothing wrong, but maybe you re right and I have to upgrade the frmware.
About k850, I know is slower than previous K series, and I didnt said the opposite, did i ? ,I just said is faster
than my N95 ( maybe because firmware version, I dont know).
__________
[ This Message was edited by: coquito on 2008-05-10 21:34 ] |
Killfr3nzy
Joined: Mar 08, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: Arabia and Hollanda
PM |
On 2008-05-10 15:15:19, zirkie101 wrote:
N82 is 1 000 000 times better than K850 ever will be. Non-negotiable. Full stop.
Any arguments with that or did that just came out of the sky?
|
Mige
Joined: Aug 31, 2007
Posts: 453
PM |
k850 is worst
[addsig] |
mode
Joined: Jan 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2008-05-10 21:43:01, noidea1 wrote:
k850 is better for me
You have no idea....LOL
Ericsson EH97, GA628, GF768, A2618s, T29s Sony Ericsson T68i, S700i, P990i, Z558i, W902, W995, X10, Arc S
*Xperia V*White*Black MW600*Sandisk Mobile Ultra 64GB microSDXC* |
Mige
Joined: Aug 31, 2007
Posts: 453
PM |
[addsig] |
elsuirad
Joined: Nov 17, 2007
Posts: 15
From: Algeria
PM, WWW
|
Maybe this will clear out the Debates and Arguments on this thread.
Why don't you buy both units and see for yourself since other members who replied here claiming that "they" got more than one mobile phone units of different models and brands and telling here that "this is better than this" and "that one is better than that one"... then, it's up to you to decide if who's telling the truth.
Me, I'm also planning to have another Sony Ericsson (still figuring out which among is the best) or Nokia N82, or probably N96 when the time comes.
_________________
[ This Message was edited by: elsuirad on 2008-06-08 05:33 ] |
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
Symbian is much more unlogic then Java (A200)
are you're trying to say that SE phones have Java based OS? haha  Plank how can you write about things which you don't understand? the only unlogic thing is your imagination. limit yourself to defend camera, don't say nothing about OS because your knowledge doesn't exist in this matter
|
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
On 2008-05-10 19:07:05, bavlondon2 wrote:
plangktan are you trying to say that navigating around a S60 phone is slower than an A200? lol Serious? Of course not its so much faster.
K850 has been nothing but a big problem. The countless threads are proof of that.
no, i said that Symbian (overall) is slower and more unlogic then Java. |
jakontil
Joined: Jun 28, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Changi, Chatswood, Cikarang
PM |
i have had my time with N82, it's a fine all around mobile-phones. it's camera is great, gps is good enough, but menu is getting slower time after time, battery ain't at its best. with my usage, it lasted only less than 16 hours.
though it's a symbian based mobile phones, i don't use its advantage over non symbian device very much. what are the symbian applications that u often use for daily life, as if you can't live without it? it's only few for my case, and it may be different with what others might have. hence, it's an easy decision to sell it after a month.
but again, its camera is outstanding, and it's xenon flash is good, but how does it compare to K850? that i ain't so sure |
aksd
Joined: Nov 11, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: UK, India
PM, WWW
|
First the SE OS is not a Java OS, its been repeated many times, max has posted a topic on it as well. The SE OS is based on OSE, do a search for it on google. There is a MIDP 2 J2ME Virtual Machine running on it, similarly on the N82, so do you call the N82 a java phone?
Symbian is NOT slower than the A200 platform in its current state, especially with S60 FP1, anybody who even thinks either last used a Symbian phone in 2005, or just is plain prejudiced towards SE phones.
In reality its Java applications that are slower than Symbian ones, this is because when a java program is executed it is first converted to Java byte code by the Virtual Machine and then to machine language. In a symbian phone native Symbian C++ code is directly converted to machine language and therefore faster.
I understand this is an SE forum, but that does'nt mean people should post wrong information.
|
tranced
Joined: Jan 19, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Santo Domingo, wonDeRland
PM |
On 2008-05-11 10:59:03, aksd wrote:
First the SE OS is not a Java OS, its been repeated many times, max has posted a topic on it as well.
SE non-symbian phones ARE NOT "JAVA" phones
|
soane28
Joined: Jun 12, 2006
Posts: 401
From: NZ
PM |
as a person who considered both phones, held the K850 and had a play with it in the store, and weighed up the options...
I bought the N82. Reasons being:
camera more reliable to get a good shot, better contrast and colours.
Xenon flash shots superior to K850.
K850 camera saving time ridiculous, far too slow.
Arkwid holding the K850 when taking picture due to the senstive sensor, you cant hold it comfortably, or put ur fingers on the back.
touch senstive buttons made me angry, prefer actual keys.
better video recording
N82 has a camera lens cover, so not prone to scratches like K850.
3.5mm jack, so i can use any headphones.
N82 design wise is better when held in hand IMO, altho i still prefer design of K850 like yourself. However, N82 is still a nice looking phone IMO.
Hope this helps... |
jakontil
Joined: Jun 28, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Changi, Chatswood, Cikarang
PM |
On 2008-05-11 10:59:03, aksd wrote:
First the SE OS is not a Java OS, its been repeated many times, max has posted a topic on it as well. The SE OS is based on OSE, do a search for it on google. There is a MIDP 2 J2ME Virtual Machine running on it, similarly on the N82, so do you call the N82 a java phone?
Symbian is NOT slower than the A200 platform in its current state, especially with S60 FP1, anybody who even thinks either last used a Symbian phone in 2005, or just is plain prejudiced towards SE phones.
In reality its Java applications that are slower than Symbian ones, this is because when a java program is executed it is first converted to Java byte code by the Virtual Machine and then to machine language. In a symbian phone native Symbian C++ code is directly converted to machine language and therefore faster.
I understand this is an SE forum, but that does'nt mean people should post wrong information.
and you are referring to? sounds very repetitive and redundant |
aksd
Joined: Nov 11, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: UK, India
PM, WWW
|
I am referring to plankgatan's post.
Repetitive as in? 'm afraid your post is'nt clear enough.
BTW Regarding the phone going slower as time goes on, thats only because of maybe remanant files after installation/uninstalltion of software. A smartphone does need a bit of maintainence if you want it working at its optimum, just like a computer. Occassionally you need to take a backup and format the phone.
| |
|
Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi
|
Posted: 2008-05-10 22:26
jay0726 | 
