Welcome to Esato.com

News Articles:

Technical details:
• Acer beTouch E140
• Motorola Razr i
• Samsung 4G LTE
• Samsung Ativ S
• Samsung Champ Neo Duos GT-C3262
• Samsung Galaxy Ace Plus
• Samsung Galaxy Beam
• Samsung Galaxy Fame
• Samsung Galaxy Fame Duos
• Samsung Galaxy Grand GT-I9080
• Samsung Galaxy Grand GT-I9082
• Samsung Galaxy Music
• Samsung Galaxy Music Dual
• Samsung Galaxy Nexus
• Samsung Galaxy Note
• Samsung Galaxy Note II
• Samsung Galaxy Pocket
• Samsung Galaxy Premier
• Samsung Galaxy R I9103
• Samsung Galaxy S Advance
• Samsung Galaxy S Duos S7562
• Samsung Galaxy S II
• Samsung Galaxy S II LTE
• Samsung Galaxy S II Plus
• Samsung Galaxy S II WiMAX ISW11SC
• Samsung Galaxy S III
• Samsung Galaxy S III Mini
• Samsung Galaxy S4
• Samsung Galaxy W
• Samsung Galaxy Xcover GT-S5690
• Samsung Galaxy Xcover II
• Samsung Galaxy Y Duos
• Samsung Galaxy Y Pro
• Samsung Galaxy Y Pro Duos
• Samsung Galaxy Young
• Samsung Galaxy Young Duos
• Samsung Google Nexus S I9020
• Samsung Omnia W
• Samsung Rex 60
• Samsung Rex 70
• Samsung Rex 80
• Samsung Rex 90
• Samsung Star 3
• Samsung Star 3 DUOS
• Samsung T-mobile Sidekick 4G
• Samsung Ultra S S7350
• Samsung Wave 3
• Samsung Wave M
• Samsung Wave Y S5380

From the forum:

Samsung, Intel lend support to FTC€s Qualcomm lawsuit

Click to view updated thread with images

Posted by Tsepz_GP
This seems some clarification of why we aren't seeing more chips from other manufacturers being used across Android.

Chip maker Qualcomm has been having a rough couple of months, not only getting sued by Apple — one of its largest customers — for unfair licensing costs, but also being accused of anti-competitive tactics by the Federal Trade Commission. In the case of the latter, now some of Qualcomm’s biggest rivals have chimed in, offering statements to the FTC in support of their monopoly accusations.

Back in January the FTC filed a complaint in federal court that states Qualcomm uses standards-essential patents to force phone makers and others in the mobile processor industry to pay higher royalties and license payments, which is a violation of the FTC’s rules on FRAND terms, or “fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory.”

This week both Samsung and Intel have filed amicus briefs with the court supporting the FTC’s lawsuit and opposing Qualcomm’s request to dismiss the case. Each company notes that Qualcomm uses its patents in order to remain the dominant player in the mobile chip industry.

“Qualcomm has maintained an interlocking web of abusive patent and commercial practices that subverts competition on the merits,” wrote Intel. Samsung noted that because Qualcomm refuses to offer the necessary license, its Exynos chips aren’t available to other companies.

The FTC trial is scheduled to begin on June 15th, so we’ll soon find out if Qualcomm will need to start playing fairly.


Click to view updated thread with images

© Esato.com - From the Esato mobile phone discussion forum