| Author |
P990 (Hermione) now official |
Indiandawg
Joined: Sep 18, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Mumbai
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2005-10-03 02:44:17, microneo wrote:
Do you think that this device would be even better with a windows pocket pc OS ?
|
|
definately
T200 -> T68i -> T610 -> K700i -> P910i -> W800i -> P990i -> M600i -> P1-> Nokia E71 -> X1i -> X10 -> Arc S -> Sony Z1 -> Sony Z Ultra -> Sony Z3+ -> iPhone 6 -> iPhone 7 Plus -> iPhone X -> iPhone XS Max |
|
|
jplacson
Joined: Apr 21, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Philippines
PM, WWW
|
Oh God... ANYTHING but a Windows OS...
|
adnhk1
Joined: May 23, 2002
Posts: 447
PM |
Mr Indian,
in case you've somehow "forgotten" my earlier post with regards to PPC devices having phone functions, here's a reminder link to "refresh" your memory 
http://www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=93796&start=465
Unless to you, those shotcomings on PPC (Windows Mobile 2003 SE) are "advantages" over Symbian UIQ, then by all means, go ahead to get yourself an Imate (Jam) or XDA II (mini) or HTC. I suspect most, if not all of these shortcomings are still there in Windows Mobile 2005, but thus far I have yet to have a chance to play with it. Only time will tell...
Cheers |
frank2345babies
Joined: May 29, 2005
Posts: 303
PM |
lookss like my w800 will be getting sold soon, i will be getting this fone no matter what |
amnesia
Joined: Jan 15, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Doha, London, Tokyo, Shanghai
PM, WWW
|
the p1000's back is ugly.
I hate that round back 
|
S4k1s
Joined: Mar 09, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden
PM |
yes .. the circle @the back should have been like the one in k600 not like in k500 |
Gamerz10
Joined: Sep 02, 2005
Posts: 50
From: Jamaica
PM, WWW
|
I think I'll wait until alot of people get this phone and give their feedbackand so on. I think I'll wait until about next year this time or thereabout. Can someone remind me of the cost of this phone?
This message was posted from a T230 |
scottyd
Joined: Dec 03, 2003
Posts: 175
From: london
PM |
ummm my thoughts as an owner of all pxxx's is that i like it a lot all seems to be improved.
BUT WHY SHRINK THE screen a key asset i feel, allwoing so much fun ang games its a bit upsetting, still im sure i wil get it. |
etaab
Joined: Jan 23, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: UK - South Yorkshire
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2005-10-03 22:53:22, amnesia wrote:
the p1000's back is ugly.
I hate that round back
|
|
Couldnt agree more. The back is foul IMO. I hate those circular lens covers, and it only appears to have 1 LED.
Check me out on Instagram ! search for etaab ! |
amnesia
Joined: Jan 15, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Doha, London, Tokyo, Shanghai
PM, WWW
|
already my changes would be.
Better camera back. Remove the keypad so the screen can be bigger, and give us a better camera.
Those three alone will turn me awn.
|
etaab
Joined: Jan 23, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: UK - South Yorkshire
PM |
Why better camera ? for all we know, it might produce better quality pictures than the K750i.
3.2mp would have been nice though.
Check me out on Instagram ! search for etaab ! |
neonismo
Joined: Oct 18, 2002
Posts: 254
From: Melbourne, Australia
PM |
This still looks like a pre-production unit. The back is obviously unfinished. The phone does look good. I think the keyboard will be difficuly to use. Good thing about the flip is that there is no screen realestate penalty to use it. I just hope that the colours are not final, as the gold makes it look so cheap. What executive is gonna flash out his gold bling bling P950 at a damn meeting?
This message was posted from a K700i |
fleshlord
Joined: Mar 07, 2005
Posts: 14
PM |
Back of the phone looks like k600 (which I never liked)
corners of the flip is looking as silly as p900's flip corners.
Look at that shape!! at least they could have saved p910's flip shape.
I think it is not new p series.
It is redesigned k600  they are tricking us !!!..
SE ruined all my dreams.. |
CemTAMAY
Joined: May 25, 2004
Posts: 3
PM |
If this is really the next generation of SEp910, they completely lost me on it.
The phone itself looks ugly and un-business like. Sorry for SE, P series were the flagship of their phone models, now it looks like a discoteque members' phone.
Very very dissapointed with the design no matter what specs they put on it.
Regards.
|
Indiandawg
Joined: Sep 18, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Mumbai
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2005-10-03 14:13:43, adnhk1 wrote:
Mr Indian,
in case you've somehow "forgotten" my earlier post with regards to PPC devices having phone functions, here's a reminder link to "refresh" your memory
http://www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=93796&start=465
Unless to you, those shotcomings on PPC (Windows Mobile 2003 SE) are "advantages" over Symbian UIQ, then by all means, go ahead to get yourself an Imate (Jam) or XDA II (mini) or HTC. I suspect most, if not all of these shortcomings are still there in Windows Mobile 2005, but thus far I have yet to have a chance to play with it. Only time will tell...
Cheers
|
|
u compare a cell phone.. watchin those sepcs?...wow...man
whers a normal uiq phone and whers PPC.
high mhz processor/windows compitable/best for the office use/supports a hell lot of apps ( better search man)... itz better to use and faster connectivity..!!..big screen... ders a lot..man...u cant..juzz make any symbian phone a winner in front of PPC
T200 -> T68i -> T610 -> K700i -> P910i -> W800i -> P990i -> M600i -> P1-> Nokia E71 -> X1i -> X10 -> Arc S -> Sony Z1 -> Sony Z Ultra -> Sony Z3+ -> iPhone 6 -> iPhone 7 Plus -> iPhone X -> iPhone XS Max |
|
|
Posted: 2005-10-03 05:57
