| Author |
Nokia 7610 vs SE K700 |
mmsman
Joined: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: slovenia
PM |
i think phones are not enough advanced to use cmos chips but i maybe wrong because i didn't payed much attention on these crap cameras....
though nokia pictures is really bad  but a lot can change, some hw and sw tweaks and voila! a 50% better pic....
for instance the 7600 review eldar had, the images were crap, but then when the phone actually hit the stores people found out that it has a good camera! maybe blurry when you move but a lot better than what eldar posted.....
but i really don't know i hope se s700 will have a better one.... |
|
|
Flying Finn
Joined: Dec 12, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Finland
PM |
I don't know what's wrong with the pic said to be taken with the 7610 but it cannot possibly show the true quality of the camera. That's worse than in the Nokia 7650 from 2001. Maybe it's the poor lightning, maybe it's the compression (the 7610's 1.0 MP image is approximately 350kb, that one is 250kb) but no one should look at only that picture and declare the camera is crap. I hope to see more pictures taken with the phone soon. Here's another one taken in fairly dark light:
From Nokias to an SE to whatever.  |
McKinley
Joined: Feb 23, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden, USA Los Angeles CA
PM |
Flying Finn
I know it is hard for you to face the fact that this camera is everything but good, I don't want to be biased but a decent camera should not take a bad shot in any condition.
SO505is has a very good photo quality so I reckon we can expect the same to our highly anticipated SE S700.
prom1
It is a CCD sensor. |
McKinley
Joined: Feb 23, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden, USA Los Angeles CA
PM |
Nokia and its built-in cam
Nokia and its design
Nokia and its display quality. |
n_block
Joined: Feb 07, 2003
Posts: 60
PM |
hi-hi-hi;))))))))))))) |
croatia
Joined: Aug 06, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: zagreb croatia europe
PM |
bravo mckinley i agree ! pic taken with samsung is much better ! and btw you nokia lovers what you do it here anyway?????? go in finland with first nokia buts what you can find in your town hahahaha |
mmsman
Joined: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: slovenia
PM |
i see where this thread is going.... again  |
slattery69
Joined: Jan 03, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: north east england
PM |
I have nt been on esato much recently and nothing has changed people slagging of nokia for the sake it . Some questions how do we know the pic wap taken with that nokia or that someone has nt messed with it to prove a point and since its there first 1mp do you think they will release it if the quality wap that poor i dont think so
This message was posted from a T610 |
McKinley
Joined: Feb 23, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden, USA Los Angeles CA
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2004-03-22 16:40:41, mmsman wrote:
i see where this thread is going.... again
|
|
I guess it is my fault
I just can't help it but I hate mobiles designed by Nokia.
They are almost all ugly.
But soon they will release 8800 and 8100 with metal finish so I guess many will want to buy one of them if the specification and price is good.
|
ivan_pk
Joined: May 02, 2004
Posts: 35
From: Caracas - Venezuela
PM |
these are pictures of the final productions of the 7610.. not from PROTOTYPE 7610's fotos people here posted
c'mon people we've got to admit these ones are good.. I hate close minded ppl.. fu-ck em. I LOVE SE but if theres a better phone, i see my possibilities...
you've got to remember the picture depends on many elements like sun light and other stuff...
this one next its a pic of the comparison between the t610's camera and the 7610's... the one on the upper left corner its from the t610.
of course its not fair to compare a CIF camera and a 1megapix.. but between these two phone which one do the SE DIE HARDS preffer?
"2nd place is the first loser" |
Leks
Joined: Jan 12, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden
PM |
Wow that Samsung image 
Then the cam in P730 must be the same 
|
jontyf
Joined: Apr 29, 2004
Posts: 468
From: Hertfordshire, England
PM |
That is great quality picz
Shame the K700i extended pictures are not of such quality
Elle - "...Which in the very near future, will be my sword"
Bea - "Bitch, you dont have a future..."
Bea - "... What did you say to Pai Mey to make him snatch out your eye?" |
Muhammad-Oli
Joined: Jun 13, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: The NZ of L
PM |
Am i wrong in saying i thought the k700 had a 1.3 megapixel camera?
This message was posted from a Z600 |
jontyf
Joined: Apr 29, 2004
Posts: 468
From: Hertfordshire, England
PM |
No, the K700i camera is VGA (640 x 480)
Only through intoleration can the picture become bigger
This was used on the T630
The way its works is that each pixel is kinda multiplied by 4 (from the surrounding pixels - colour etc)
It makes the picture bigger
Elle - "...Which in the very near future, will be my sword"
Bea - "Bitch, you dont have a future..."
Bea - "... What did you say to Pai Mey to make him snatch out your eye?" |
jh67
Joined: Nov 30, 2001
Posts: > 500
From: denmark
PM, WWW
|
Yep,..you're thinking of the S-700,..that has a 1.3 MP 
K700 cam is quite good, better than most VGA's.
I was actually standing with the 7610 some days ago,..really like it, but when I saw the K700i, I knew right away which one I would buy.
It doesnt all depend on the camera,..also built quality, connectivity etc are important/more important to me,...and the K700 is ahead on these things.
Not that the 7610 is poor quality, but the K700 is just so well built !
And having just had a 6600, I didnt really want to play around with more "pc-connectivity-issues",...SE is clearly better at this !
Remember NOT TO slaughter me, I actually like the 7610,..its a great phone, it was just beaten,..in MY opinion.
BR
Jan
Nextlink Marketing Manager and Bluespoon Hardware Designer. |
|
|
Posted: 2004-03-20 23:11
