| Author |
Nokia 7610 vs SE K700 |
gseth
Joined: Sep 08, 2002
Posts: > 500
PM, WWW
|
Which One?
Nokia is almost the same size and has a 1megapixel camera!! |
|
|
croatia
Joined: Aug 06, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: zagreb croatia europe
PM |
your choice my friend ! i personaly hate nokia hehe cheers ! |
caff
Joined: Jun 14, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Australia
PM |
almost same size?? Are you kidding ??
|
mmsman
Joined: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: slovenia
PM |
compare a 7560 and a t610 that's something like the 7610 and k700...
7610 is feature wise, while k700 is small and stylish
(well ok 7610 doesn't look bad- it's a stylish phone, but i think the size and design of k700 is better, more conservative....) |
bohdan
Joined: Aug 15, 2003
Posts: 138
From: Poland
PM, WWW
|
So 7610 is great because it has 1megapixel 3.7mm camera? It makes ugly, blurry photos like vga nokia phones but bigger. |
mmsman
Joined: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: slovenia
PM |
and how do you know that?
|
bohdan
Joined: Aug 15, 2003
Posts: 138
From: Poland
PM, WWW
|
Look at this 
from mobilmania.cz| Compare it with other megapixel phones.
[ This Message was edited by: bohdan on 2004-03-20 13:09 ] |
McKinley
Joined: Feb 23, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden, USA Los Angeles CA
PM |
bohdan
I really don't find anything special with that image at all.
Colours are far from accurate with alot of blueish cast and this image is very underexposed as well with grainy parts.
Nokia 7610 itself is a nice handset with alot of good features but its design is like almost all Nokia, TERRIBLE!!
Oh by the way.. you guys think that image is good?
Forget it ok?
This is Nokia and they obviously don't know what to do with built-in cam.
These images below were taken with Samsung SCH-V420 1.3MPixels built-in cam.
Some macro shots
Night shots
[ This Message was edited by: McKinley on 2004-03-20 15:46 ] |
dxreaper
Joined: Jul 24, 2003
Posts: 87
From: Malaysia
PM |
McKliney,
I think bohan was trying to say how bad Nokia's picture is, and I agree =).. hehe...
Saw the pictures taken with the SO505i... this nokia can't match.. colour all wrong and all |
bohdan
Joined: Aug 15, 2003
Posts: 138
From: Poland
PM, WWW
|
Quote:
| I think bohan was trying to say how bad Nokia's picture is, and I agree =).. hehe... |
|
exactly  |
McKinley
Joined: Feb 23, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden, USA Los Angeles CA
PM |
dxreaper
Welcome to this forum
Nice to see you here
My bad bohdan
I'm ill and coughing like hell so I can't think properly
|
gseth
Joined: Sep 08, 2002
Posts: > 500
PM, WWW
|
Can someone post pictures taken by the k700!! |
*Jojo*
Joined: Oct 15, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM |
I think I'll go for the new Nokia 7610 ! |
deuxani
Joined: Jul 03, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Amsterdam, Merate, Pula
PM |
I really hope that one day SE will come with a Symbian phone like the 7610, 6600, SX1, X, etc. Too bad the Samsung D710 doens't have Bluetooth, cause it would almost be the perfect phone. (Next to the P** of course  ) |
Supa_Fly
Joined: Apr 16, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Toronto, Ontario
PM, WWW
|
McKinley, nice pics you posted!! I really am hoping that the SE K700 although only VGA can produce vivid accurate colors like that!!
From what I understand though, any camera (phone or actual) that takes a picture in low light without flash is prone to bad underexposure. Also, without an infrared sensor to pinpoint where your zooming to fine focus on your subject; will result in horrible pictures as well (that blurry affect).
Furthermore, the type of chip - CMOS or CCD - plays a significant role as well in picture quality. The old CCD chips were kinda ok, the new ones are much better, while the CMOS chips significantly better at produce real-life colours/finer pixels/clarity of any image.
Though I could be wrong.
McKinley, is that Samsung your using have a CMOS or CCD chip??
Anyone know if the upcoming K700 have a CMOS or CCD chip in its camera?? |
|
|
Posted: 2004-03-20 13:04
