Esato

Forum > Manufacturer Discussion > Nokia > Nokia Lumia 1020

Visitors browsing this topic: 1
Add to Bookmarks
Previous  123 ... 282930 ... 707172  Next
Author Nokia Lumia 1020
wthc
Model not set
Joined: Jul 04, 2013
Posts: 19
PM
Posted: 2013-08-22 23:26
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Sonysta, you are talking nonsense, maybe you don’t know what is the noise…

Here is the noise with your beloved 808 Pureview

Your photo posted above, iso 1600:

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

Iso 400, full size:

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

http://www.esato.com/phonepho[....]ureview/201301282239RN735K.jpg

And others:

iso 400:
http://www.esato.com/phonepho[....]ureview/201306241749Z0wqa6.jpg

iso 640:
http://www.esato.com/phonepho[....]ureview/201307181353e3q8aX.jpg

Samsung Zoom full of noise too. How do you say? Fact!!!
[ This Message was edited by: wthc on 2013-08-22 22:28 ]
etaab
Nokia N8
Joined: Jan 23, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: UK - South Yorkshire
PM
Posted: 2013-08-22 23:45
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
All digital cameras have noise. Ive never understood how people can say one does not and another does.

The 808 has just as much noise as any other cameraphone when used in full resolution with no pureview downsampling.
Check me out on Instagram ! search for etaab !
Marly
Apple iPhone 6
Joined: Jun 04, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Netherlands
PM
Posted: 2013-08-23 00:14
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
^^
Exactly

But some people here like to spend hours searching the internet for pictures that show more or less noise from a particular phone, depending on whether it's other people's phone, or their own favourite device.

Would never even think of wasting my time like this myself, prefer to have a life
"America: please don’t be a Dumpfkopf"
wthc
Model not set
Joined: Jul 04, 2013
Posts: 19
PM
Posted: 2013-08-23 00:28
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Marly, it’s not a matter of getting a life, if we talk about 808 noise we must see pictures like these. By the way needs 2 minutes to search them. First crop was a 100% crop with pureview downsampling, too much easy to find noise with 808.
Sonysta
C901 Black
Joined: May 25, 2013
Posts: 198
PM
Posted: 2013-08-23 00:33
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Wthc... You have mental problem or is illiterate ?

Can not read ? Do not know interpret a text ?

At no time said that there is no noise in the picture posted but that the existing noise this image to ISO 1600 is more than acceptable and no other cameraphone offers such a result !

Clarified that, let the facts:

* In the first example in full resolution, there is no benefit of postprocessing pureview and all images work with only 1.4 microns, so no novelty in noise presented ... In summary without any credibility example, since the magic pureview occurs in images 8, 5 and 3MP !

* In the second example, even though in pureview mode, the image was extremely poorly captured (since when a picture is taken against bright light ?) And of course, the lenses were dirty, compromising the final quality! !

So again this example has no validity !

* The third image has a noise very well controlled, something no other phone offers !

So this very good, there is an example to denigrate the 808 but yes exalts it !

Finally, in the ISO speed 50 to 250 in mode pureview (8, 5 and 3 MP), all the images captured by the 808 Pureview has NO NOISE !

At ISO 250 to 800 pureview mode (8, 5 and 3MP), the images show LITTLE NOISE !

And ISO 800 to 1600 in pureview mode (8, 5 and 3MP), the images have noise, but this NOISE IS VERY WELL CONTROLLED and the images have acceptable quality !

Something no other phone offers in such a situation !

Finally you is not suited to criticize any thing here because their photographic knowledge is nil... Just seeing mediocre quality of your images !

P.S: A picture to shut your mouth definitely



LINK: http://www.esato.com/phonepho[....]ureview/201305052343DrX30k.jpg

No other cameraphone in the world offers such a result... This is fact, the rest is you !
[ This Message was edited by: Sonysta on 2013-08-23 00:11 ]
wthc
Model not set
Joined: Jul 04, 2013
Posts: 19
PM
Posted: 2013-08-23 00:50
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
You are so excited, be careful with drugs! Do you make love with your beloved phone? Remains only this?

On 2013-08-23 00:33:59, Sonysta wrote:
* In the second example, even though in pureview mode, the image was extremely poorly captured (since when a picture is taken against bright light ?) And of course, the lenses were dirty !
So again this example has no validity !


You are so comic!
Sonysta
C901 Black
Joined: May 25, 2013
Posts: 198
PM
Posted: 2013-08-23 00:51
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
And you are a bad joke without argument, that should just be ignored !!!
[ This Message was edited by: Sonysta on 2013-08-22 23:55 ]
wthc
Model not set
Joined: Jul 04, 2013
Posts: 19
PM
Posted: 2013-08-23 00:56
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
On 2013-08-23 00:33:59, Sonysta wrote:
P.S: A picture to shut your mouth definitely


Omg… last pic at iso 50 and 1.79 sec.
Bonovox
LG G4
Joined: Apr 13, 2008
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2013-08-23 01:05
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
For crying out loud
Phone?? What phone??
hihihans
HTC One
Joined: Mar 15, 2009
Posts: > 500
From: Netherlands
PM
Posted: 2013-08-23 07:42
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
It's getting confusing to read the 808 and 1020 threads. I can't tell the difference any more
cu015170
Nokia 808 PureView
Joined: Oct 26, 2010
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2013-08-23 11:42
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
The 808 starts showing noise above 200 iso.. but its very clean @ 50-100 , which can't be said for any other camera phone.

It would also remain relatively cleaner at higher ISOs ..or at least I think it would be a bib better than the 1020 at 800-1200iso, but I have to test it out.

Either way when you look at the price difference and the IQ difference b/w the 1020 and the 808... the Symbian device is a much better deal.
[ This Message was edited by: cu015170 on 2013-08-23 10:44 ]
TeeGee
Nokia Lumia 925
Joined: Apr 10, 2012
Posts: 96
From: UK/NL
PM
Posted: 2013-08-23 12:03
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2013-08-23 07:42:00, hihihans wrote:
It's getting confusing to read the 808 and 1020 threads. I can't tell the difference any more



You're not the only one, but you, as a mod, can do something about it: please throw the off-topic 808-stuff out of this thread!
Nobody is interested in reading the same discussion twice, except those posting it, obviously

Live and let live, how hard can it be ?
cu015170
Nokia 808 PureView
Joined: Oct 26, 2010
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2013-08-23 17:05
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
The only phone you can compare the 1020 to in terms of camera is the 808. Since that is it's main selling point.. I think it makes perfect sense to talk about both phones in both threads.
TeeGee
Nokia Lumia 925
Joined: Apr 10, 2012
Posts: 96
From: UK/NL
PM
Posted: 2013-08-23 17:19
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Then you're probably the only one, who thinks that Sonystas posts make any sense at all

Live and let live, how hard can it be ?
Marly
Apple iPhone 6
Joined: Jun 04, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Netherlands
PM
Posted: 2013-08-23 17:34
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
@TeeGee:
Don't bother with Guarulh.. oops... Sonysta, I've given up reading his "posts" long time ago.
Usually don't even bother anymore, to read this whole thread.
[ This Message was edited by: Marly on 2013-08-23 16:47 ]
"America: please don’t be a Dumpfkopf"
Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi
Previous  123 ... 282930 ... 707172  Next
Goto page:
Lock this Topic Move this Topic Delete this Topic