| Author |
Nokia Lumia 1020 |
Sonysta
Joined: May 25, 2013
Posts: 198
PM |
cu015170, by the amount of great noise and low detail (in full resolution), I am also thinking that 1020 uses Sony sensor ! 
[ This Message was edited by: Sonysta on 2013-07-14 22:47 ] |
|
|
Sonysta
Joined: May 25, 2013
Posts: 198
PM |
Most people still want to believe que the 1020 will have better IQ than the 808 .. The Same behavior was Observed When the 920 was about to launch, but one look at the pics and it was obvious que is not the case.
Its The Same now, its just that the difference is smaller because the lens and the sensor are much, much better than the ones in the 920.
But the truth is one, even the Galaxy S 4 showed that the best photos of 1020, all photos of 1020 has unreal colors and packed with noise !
Understand all at once… 808 has a higher image sensor (bigger 56%), improved post processing (no noise) and more integrated microns per pixel… There is no chance for the 920 with 41 megapixels (mean 1020) ! |
etaab
Joined: Jan 23, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: UK - South Yorkshire
PM |
On 2013-07-11 23:30:27, Bonovox wrote:
And people wonder why i don't stick around here
Nobody wonders. We do wonder why you say you're never coming back but always do though.
I can see what everyone means by the image quality is lesser than the 808, but I think its just because the shots they've produced so far are just point and snap. Where as when in the hands of the user, we spend more time getting those quality shots from the camera.
Every single time we have this where any camera centric phone is released. Every single time. It gets very repetitious having the same conversation year in, year out.
Personally I like it. Will I get one ? im not sure yet.
Check me out on Instagram ! search for etaab ! |
cu015170
Joined: Oct 26, 2010
Posts: > 500
PM |
Some of the images have very good sharpness toward the middle of the frame..
This:http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2877/9264385004_855360efaf_o.jpg
after a resize:
pretty impressive
But at the same time.. look at the bending buildings towards the end of the frame, no bueno..
|
Vit
Joined: Nov 13, 2007
Posts: 279
From: Brazil
PM |
On 2013-07-14 23:08:58, Sonysta wrote:
Most people still want to believe que the 1020 will have better IQ than the 808 .. The Same behavior was Observed When the 920 was about to launch, but one look at the pics and it was obvious que is not the case.
Its The Same now, its just that the difference is smaller because the lens and the sensor are much, much better than the ones in the 920.
But the truth is one, even the Galaxy S 4 showed that the best photos of 1020, all photos of 1020 has unreal colors and packed with noise !
Understand all at once… 808 has a higher image sensor (bigger 56%), improved post processing (no noise) and more integrated microns per pixel… There is no chance for the 920 with 41 megapixels (mean 1020) !
I guess there's something wrong with the PureView algorithms this time round. Oversampled pictures don't seem to be much less noisy than unprocessed ones.
I find it extremely suspicious that Nokia hasn't provided a single HIGH-ISO shot until now.
I guess that they simply haven't got the SW finalized just yet.
That 4 sec exposure they have provided is pretty cr@ppy.
I don't like those soft spots spread all over the frame as well.
Every Picture Tells a Story |
cu015170
Joined: Oct 26, 2010
Posts: > 500
PM |
Impressive engineering
 |
cu015170
Joined: Oct 26, 2010
Posts: > 500
PM |
Still not impressed..
http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3723/9306304777_637eac5410_o.jpg
http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3798/9309080244_87546a5146_o.jpg
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7418/9306853401_8203431687_o.jpg
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7415/9306301299_3fdb90d746_o.jpg |
cu015170
Joined: Oct 26, 2010
Posts: > 500
PM |
more full resolution samples here: https://skydrive.live.com/?ci[....]003&authkey=%21AIhI2jWNbbywbu4
I think the 5Mpix distilled images will look pretty good, not as good as the 808.. but still better than anything else
Audio recording is the same as the 808.. great news
Bit rate : 256 Kbps
Channel(s) : 2 channels
Channel positions : Front: L R
Sampling rate : 48.0 KHz
[ This Message was edited by: cu015170 on 2013-07-20 03:45 ] |
Sonysta
Joined: May 25, 2013
Posts: 198
PM |
For sure, great news !
In fact Lumia 1020 Pureview will be lower than the 808 Pureview photographically, but know that your camcorder will be better (ois + great audio quality), it is a great achievement !!! |
cu015170
Joined: Oct 26, 2010
Posts: > 500
PM |
Yes.. I still think the IQ during video will be worse on the 1020, but @ 2mpix (1080p) it shouldn't be visible at all.
I can say with confidence that the 1020 will be the best smartphone for video recording for a long time.
OIS, zooming, HAAC microphones, stereo recording... can't ask for more  |
mlife
Joined: Jan 16, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM |
AT&T site now also has the Battery Grip on pre-order for $59 (US) but seems to only come in Black or White.
[addsig] |
G3ORGE
Joined: Jul 10, 2013
Posts: 59
PM |
New samples,
https://skydrive.live.com/?cid=B152D934457008F2&id=B152D934457008F2!2991&authkey=!AIhI2jWNbbywbu4
Not very impressive. |
cu015170
Joined: Oct 26, 2010
Posts: > 500
PM |
especially some of them.. I don't understand why there is so much noise at 100 iso
unless this is zoomed in.. it shouldn't be that bad
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7399/9336623499_c2302f2028_o.jpg |
cu015170
Joined: Oct 26, 2010
Posts: > 500
PM |
200 iso
https://upba0q.bay.livefilest[....]fRtY23Na4h/WP_20130721%202.jpg
middle, very sharp.. sharper than the 808 on auto
edge.. no bueno
 |
alenn
Joined: Nov 07, 2010
Posts: > 500
From: Croatia,Zagreb
PM, WWW
|
The edges really suck, especially when there are a thousand of lenses stacked in that small sensor. |
|
|
Posted: 2013-07-14 23:04
