Esato

Forum > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > no 16M yet? its 2008!

Author no 16M yet? its 2008!
zub
P900 no flip
Joined: Mar 19, 2004
Posts: 264
From: London
PM
Posted: 2008-02-15 02:46
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
well i dare anyone of you to challenge any sharp phone above 904sh. Their screens are truely superb and beat ANY other phone brand's screen on the market!

i'm not biased, i own a sharp 904sh, but also own a p990i and a p1i, so neh!
BobaFett
R520 copper
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
Posted: 2008-02-15 02:53
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
here are some specs

http://www.gsmarena.com/first[....]isplay__sharp_904-news-174.php
Aquila non capit muscas - /// 4ever!

/// Ericsson Forum
zub
P900 no flip
Joined: Mar 19, 2004
Posts: 264
From: London
PM
Posted: 2008-02-15 03:24
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
is'nt it just grand XD
mode
Sony Xperia Z1
Joined: Jan 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2008-02-15 03:58
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
If anyone wants to shut someone up in this thread and call it a day, there's no other way than to compare the display photos of an E90 with SE's finest display (I'd say W910 for now unless someone knows of a better one). Anyone up for the challenge?
Ericsson EH97, GA628, GF768, A2618s, T29s Sony Ericsson T68i, S700i, P990i, Z558i, W902, W995, X10, Arc S
*Xperia V*White*Black MW600*Sandisk Mobile Ultra 64GB microSDXC*
BobaFett
R520 copper
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
Posted: 2008-02-15 04:02
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
pix wont help, u have to see it "live" imo...
Aquila non capit muscas - /// 4ever!

/// Ericsson Forum
mode
Sony Xperia Z1
Joined: Jan 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2008-02-15 04:32
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
I agree, nothing substitutes a live experience, but picture comparison side by side would obviously give us a fair idea qualitatively speaking
Ericsson EH97, GA628, GF768, A2618s, T29s Sony Ericsson T68i, S700i, P990i, Z558i, W902, W995, X10, Arc S
*Xperia V*White*Black MW600*Sandisk Mobile Ultra 64GB microSDXC*
BobaFett
R520 copper
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
Posted: 2008-02-15 04:35
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
the problem is, that its almost impossible to show the same result with pix... i tries ones to make some pix of my e60, but it didnt came out very well. so i made some screenshots instead, which reflects less or more how bright and clear the screen is.
Aquila non capit muscas - /// 4ever!

/// Ericsson Forum
thecell
K700
Joined: Aug 25, 2004
Posts: 107
From: Indonesia
PM
Posted: 2008-02-15 04:38
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
do we really can judge phone with 16m colour screen without looking it spec?
U didnt know if NOKIA give a fake colour spec, it written 16m but the fact is just 262k colour, who know, LOL.

SE and SAMSUNG 262k mostly better than Nokia's, how ironic.
BobaFett
R520 copper
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
Posted: 2008-02-15 04:40
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
u must be kidding i hope... do u think that nokia give us fake specs, knowingm that many ppl test the fone and if its fake, it would turn out within a week... pls...
Aquila non capit muscas - /// 4ever!

/// Ericsson Forum
mode
Sony Xperia Z1
Joined: Jan 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2008-02-15 07:28
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2008-02-15 04:35:02, BobaFett wrote:
the problem is, that its almost impossible to show the same result with pix... i tries ones to make some pix of my e60, but it didnt came out very well. so i made some screenshots instead, which reflects less or more how bright and clear the screen is.



IMO taking screenshots is even less reliable in comparing display quality since we will not be looking directly through the screen itself which has to be done because there will be refraction and aberration to some degree and will ultimately affect viewing experience. Photo comparison is far from perfect but is the next best thing rather than having to buy both phones to see the difference. Screenshots may also contain variables, ie screenshot sw used etc. Photos may show lower quality but it clearly shows the difference between the displays
Ericsson EH97, GA628, GF768, A2618s, T29s Sony Ericsson T68i, S700i, P990i, Z558i, W902, W995, X10, Arc S
*Xperia V*White*Black MW600*Sandisk Mobile Ultra 64GB microSDXC*
islandprd
K750
Joined: Nov 29, 2007
Posts: 176
PM
Posted: 2008-02-15 07:38
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
I kinda agree that 16M is no biggie. I have N95 8 and I often amazed how poor the same photo looks on its screen compare to S500. Yet many people brush off S500 completely.


centur
C902 Black
Joined: Jun 10, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Bulgaria
PM, WWW
Posted: 2008-02-15 08:19
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2008-02-11 11:53:35, sesukaku wrote:
shame on SE, up until this date, they have not yet to release any phone with 16M colors. I do understand and i see their screen have been improved a lot since K750, but it is just a shame that they have not yet implement more colors on it. Nokia has been using 16M color screen since last year.


Please donwload: ColorDepths and see colors with your eyes.


QVGA
Nokia Lumia 1020
Joined: May 23, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pakistan
PM, WWW
Posted: 2008-02-15 08:23
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2008-02-15 08:19:05, centur wrote:

On 2008-02-11 11:53:35, sesukaku wrote:
shame on SE, up until this date, they have not yet to release any phone with 16M colors. I do understand and i see their screen have been improved a lot since K750, but it is just a shame that they have not yet implement more colors on it. Nokia has been using 16M color screen since last year.


Please donwload: ColorDepths and see colors with your eyes.





if no one can spot the incredibly evident difference between 16m and 65k in that pic, then please, your eyes arnt probably even worthy of high end screens.
DarkKrypt
Sony Xperia S
Joined: May 15, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Melbourne,Australia
PM, WWW
Posted: 2008-02-15 08:41
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
put that image on your phone now...
tell me what you see
lol
| history 5110, 8210, 3310, P900/10,8250, 5210, 1100, 3220, GA628,T105,w810,K550, K610,W880,W910,P1,G900,C905, Satio, x10 mini, arc, XS, XZ, XZ3, XZ5P,XA2U
kenoby
P1
Joined: Dec 17, 2007
Posts: 407
From: 404
PM
Posted: 2008-02-15 09:53
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2008-02-15 08:23:53, QVGA wrote:

On 2008-02-15 08:19:05, centur wrote:

On 2008-02-11 11:53:35, sesukaku wrote:
shame on SE, up until this date, they have not yet to release any phone with 16M colors. I do understand and i see their screen have been improved a lot since K750, but it is just a shame that they have not yet implement more colors on it. Nokia has been using 16M color screen since last year.


Please donwload: ColorDepths and see colors with your eyes.



if no one can spot the incredibly evident difference between 16m and 65k in that pic, then please, your eyes arnt probably even worthy of high end screens.



Ohhh.. I can not. Tracy... Why do I spent the money on the unworthy phones then?

[ This Message was edited by: kenoby on 2008-02-15 08:54 ]
Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi
Goto page:
Lock this Topic Move this Topic Delete this Topic