| Author |
no 16M yet? its 2008! |
sesukaku
Joined: Sep 23, 2006
Posts: 127
PM |
shame on SE, up until this date, they have not yet to release any phone with 16M colors. I do understand and i see their screen have been improved a lot since K750, but it is just a shame that they have not yet implement more colors on it. Nokia has been using 16M color screen since last year. |
|
|
bijou
Joined: Mar 14, 2007
Posts: 22
PM |
i dont think you can really see teh diff' between 256k and 16mil colours on so small screen. 65-to 256 is smth diff' |
SilveR.
Joined: May 03, 2002
Posts: > 500
PM |
Why shame.. ?
I think SE know what they are doing.
If I like 16m screen more, then I would stay away from 256k. You have a choose there 
--------------------- |
kenoby
Joined: Dec 17, 2007
Posts: 407
From: 404
PM |
@ thread starter, please write one visual difference between these two screens.. |
Alfaro
Joined: May 31, 2007
Posts: 127
From: Brazil
PM |
why 16m??? to suck more battery?? |
Seanyb2
Joined: Jan 26, 2007
Posts: > 500
PM |
Yes you can see the difference. I used to have a Nokia 6300 and they are much brighter and really makes pictures look better. I have noticed the difference between that phones screen and my K800h. So ya talking rubbish man.
This message was posted from a K800i |
jcwhite_uk
Joined: Feb 18, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Dorset, UK Phone:Xperia Z1
PM, WWW
|
Brightness has nothing to do with the amount of colours. |
se_dude
Joined: Nov 07, 2007
Posts: > 500
PM |
compare the T650 or the k850 with ne 16m phone including the N95  |
kenoby
Joined: Dec 17, 2007
Posts: 407
From: 404
PM |
On 2008-02-11 14:03:37, Seanyb2 wrote:
Yes you can see the difference. I used to have a Nokia 6300 and they are much brighter and really makes pictures look better. I have noticed the difference between that phones screen and my K800h. So ya talking rubbish man.
This message was posted from a K800i
I am not that experienced and my eye is not so heavily trained as yours to notice a difference on numbers of colors my display has. Even my N95 could not note a difference placed next to mine K850i in color numbers. Maybe if I could be patient enough to sit and count the colors on same picture displayed. I will maybe then be able to share my wisdom in a way you have did with me, man. |
not_me
Joined: Jun 30, 2007
Posts: 304
PM |
At least they include a serious amount of internal memory now, z770i is with 32mb the only one below 150MB onboard memory, I'm sure they gonna introduce some phones with 16M screens, because people want it!
It's the same thing as with the Megapixel race and so, more Megapixel doesn't mean better pictures, may even make worse pictures, but they gonna release such products, because they are well aware of the fact that the average Joe/Jane is convinced that more does mean better !!!!!
... |
laurenke01
Joined: Apr 04, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: USA
PM |
After having used an HTC, an SE, and a Nokia, I've drawn this uninformed, unprofessional conclusion:
On a 2.8" QVGA screen with 65K colors (the HTC), the screen looks bad. Bad color, bad resolution, large screen.
On the SE...2" QVGA screen, 262K colors, the screen looks great. "Bad" resolution, but the physical size and color make it look good.
On the Nokia...2.6" QVGA screen with 16 million colors. Largish screen, "bad" resolution, but the colors make up for it.
On the new X1...3" screen and only 65K colors...but 800x480 pixels. The lack of colors is offset by the density of the screen.
So, in my own roundabout way, I think the amount of colors a screen has can be offset by the pixel density and the size of the screen. But we'll have to wait and see. |
nikos_se
Joined: Nov 04, 2007
Posts: 187
From: england
PM |
i cannot understand the difference when i see a screen with 16m and a screen with 262k........well that's just me!!!! |
se_dude
Joined: Nov 07, 2007
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2008-02-11 15:18:00, laurenke01 wrote:
On the new X1...3" screen and only 65K colors...but 800x480 pixels. The lack of colors is offset by the density of the screen.
So, in my own roundabout way, I think the amount of colors a screen has can be offset by the pixel density and the size of the screen. But we'll have to wait and see.
The X1 has a WVGA screen dude..will more than make up for it |
gola
Joined: Jul 17, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: South Africa
PM |
On 2008-02-11 18:37:17, nikos_se wrote:
i cannot understand the difference when i see a screen with 16m and a screen with 262k........well that's just me!!!!
i have been in contact with a 6300 and the screen is honestly and noticably better than the normal non-16mil colored phones...
"Getting wisdom is the wisest thing you can do!"
Proverbs 4: 7 |
Seanyb2
Joined: Jan 26, 2007
Posts: > 500
PM |
I have downloaded the same pictures on my old 6300 and on my K800i and the pictures on the 6300 were far more colourful and much brighter. And as for battery life well perhaps the other phone manufactuers have something to learn from Panasonic. I used to have a Panasonic phone with 16m colours and the battery life was amazing lasted days and days. I know and have noticed and seen the difference so thats all i have to say.
|
|
|
Posted: 2008-02-11 11:53
