On 2008-02-15 13:09:07, BobaFett wrote:
On 2008-02-15 07:38:47, islandprd wrote:
I kinda agree that 16M is no biggie. I have N95 8 and I often amazed how poor the same photo looks on its screen compare to S500. Yet many people brush off S500 completely.
dont forget, that the n95 screen res is really crap, compared to other nokia devices
On 2008-02-12 06:11:56, Amras wrote:
Enough about the theory. Let's compare.
Both phones are rather new in term of release date so it's quite fair to compare both.
K770 (1.9", 256k color screen, TFT) Vs 6120 Classic (2", 16M color screen, TFT) - all set to maximum brightness.
K770 is always on the LEFT side
All the colors (black, white, red, green, blue) are obviously better in K770. K770 wins easily in term of brightness as well.
But interesting fact is K770's is
not even the best display from SE yet. S500 is better.
S500 (similar to W580) - K770
In case you think my review is biased, I'm not the only one who reviewed this kind of thing.
W580 - U600 (both are TFT 256k colors)
see W580 Vs U600, then see this:
U600 - N95 (TFT 256k Vs TFT 16M)
W580 - W910 (both are TFT 256k colors)
N95 - N95 8GB
and don't ever conclude anything if you compare those 16M screens with
K800. coz K800 display is WAY behind newest SE:
S500 - M600 - K800
viewing angle??
don't worry..
latest SE phones do the best:
Open your eyes please.. It's obvious that SE
[u]latest[/u] displays are superb in term of brightness, saturation, contrast, viewing angle, direct sunlight view.
Now tell me what is so special about those 16M color screens?
You don't have to envy those Nokias' 16M color screens. Really.
As for me, I'd rather have a 256k color screen SE phone than a 16M color screen Nokia phone.
_________________
---- tempat sapi-sapi ngumpul kebo...
[ This Message was edited by: Amras on 2008-02-12 05:48 ]
Posted: 2008-12-05 23:07
(naprimjer slijepci i sl 
)
displays look better than most on the market
