| Author |
How many of you Want Windows Mobile OS In Sony Ericsson Mobile Phones? |
chili
Joined: Dec 09, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Philippines
PM, WWW
|
I'd be happy to see SE make hardscreen UIQ phones. Basically retain the excellent UI of SE Java phones and have Symbian running in there for the sake of applications that can integrate with the shell better than J2ME. A K810 with a smartphone OS inside... It's my dream  |
|
|
dancingfate
Joined: Sep 25, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Jakarta, Indonesia
PM |
On 2007-09-08 18:03:25, grizlore wrote:
no!
.... and why so many themes have a windows feel is just weird !!!!
Im agree with you. I dont like SE themes with Windows style, in every phones.
SE with WM? No. thanks. It'd better if SE improve its UIQ.
Apple iPhone 4, HTC Evo 3D, HTC Sensation, HTC Inspire 4G, HTC Desire S, HTC Wildfire, S001, SO905iCS, T650 (Gold & Green), C901, W800, K660, K700, Beibei (G702), Severine (DEAD) |
mode
Joined: Jan 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
PM |
I use windows everyday for everything, from work to my personal stuff, so UIQ is my sanctity
[ This Message was edited by: mode on 2007-09-08 18:05 ] |
Tsepz_GP
Joined: Dec 27, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Johannesburg, South Africa
PM |
I totaly agree with that! @ Chili, i remember wishing that the W900 would run a non-touchscreen Symbian UIQ, it would have been SO PERFECT and it would have justified that phones price, i would hate for SE to use WM, its bad enough that Samsung and Motorola are using it, like Masseur said LEAVE IT to the pros: HTC
Phone: iPhone 15 Pro Max Black Ti 512GB
Tablet: iPad Pro 11” 2020 Space Gray 256GB
Watch: Series 3 Nike Edition Space Gray
Droid: Huawei Mate 40 Pro 256GB |
makbil
Joined: Oct 26, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Istanbul
PM |
Besides my personal preference for Symbian, I just can't imagine WM in either P990 or P1. Going from menu to menu would require a cup of coffee between each...
WM is just too processing power hungry to be of practical use in mobile devices.
P990i: A mistake, a curse and a disgrace  So I lowered my expectations and settled for a P1i. I couldn't keep my expectations so low for a long time so now I have an HTC Touch HD |
Nanu
Joined: Feb 18, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Warrington, UK
PM, WWW
|
I use and like both UI's but I find UIQ the most user friendly!
|
max_wedge
Joined: Aug 29, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Australia
PM, WWW
|
I like the windows mobile interface (with some exceptions), but tend to agree with masseur, it's best left to HTC.
|
chili
Joined: Dec 09, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Philippines
PM, WWW
|
I'd love to see the Linux penguin on an SE phone's boot-up someday, it's so consistent with the feel of SE Java phones - individualist for the sake of efficiency, elegant but not stiff, with a sense of humor but not gaudy. But it'll be Symbian i guess if ever non-touchscreen phones do happen!  |
ttsng
Joined: Nov 09, 2006
Posts: 61
PM |
I think it is not a bad idea. wm has a ton of application |
grizlore
Joined: Dec 07, 2006
Posts: 234
From: Roses of the Shires [UK]
PM |
so.... that's.....
one person saying "not a bad idea" & everyone else..... "NO!"
next question
[addsig] |
max_wedge
Joined: Aug 29, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Australia
PM, WWW
|
On 2007-09-09 04:08:00, chili wrote:
I'd love to see the Linux penguin on an SE phone's boot-up someday, it's so consistent with the feel of SE Java phones - individualist for the sake of efficiency, elegant but not stiff, with a sense of humor but not gaudy. But it'll be Symbian i guess if ever non-touchscreen phones do happen!
IMHO WM in hardscreen formfactor is a complete waste of effort - WM is most usefull as a touchscreen OS and many of the advantages of WM have to do with the "mouse like" input of the stylus - these features don't apply to hardscreen phones (smartphone or not). UIQ and s60 UI's are much better suited to hardscreen phones than WM. WM is really for PDA like phones - for those who prefer touchscreens on smartphones (like myself). Still, SE has a touchscreen UI that is perfectly fine, so no need to WM.
What I'd like to see from SE is a UIQ touchscreen in a slide formfactor with dpad or joystick and softkeys like non UIQ SE handsets, with keypad under slide. Best of bopth worlds then 
|
razec
Joined: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Mars
PM |
UIQ is way as powerful as windows mobile TS, but due to the small group of developers in their side we can't discern the advantages whilst the decades old windows already formed a large scale of developers in both system and 3rd party aspects. the incompatibility of older symbian applications to the new system is the main problem with symbian phone systems. if it's like Palm, then it would be another story 
anyway the UIQ 3 was the first OS platform to able have animations/transitions effect in it's menu/sub menus. S60 will have that capability in their FP2 revision. although FP1 allows the V-shape transitions in the manu but not in submenus.
10 years at Esato |
jarekt
Joined: Nov 12, 2005
Posts: 2
From: poland
PM |
That's the point. WM is superior than UIQ not becouse OS itself but becouse there are tons of applications. I can choose between 15 kinds of navigation software with my WM6 devices for example. Do I need to say more?
In the past there were faboulous devices with Palm OS made by Sony. If it's possible to pack WM into them... |
NoD
Joined: Sep 09, 2007
Posts: 5
PM |
No thanx...Keep Windoze out of Sony ! |
C905
Joined: Jul 08, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Denmark
PM |
the UIQ is a strong and nice userface it just needs some small changes |
|
|
Posted: 2007-09-08 18:16
So I lowered my expectations and settled for a P1i. I couldn't keep my expectations so low for a long time so now I have an HTC Touch HD 
