| Author |
Hamas' view ahead |
PeterKay
Joined: Jul 08, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: The Ummah
PM, WWW
|
don't leave the planet, esato needs you 
|
|
|
JK
Joined: Feb 24, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: S. Africa - JOZI
PM |
They also said they gonna attack the us and the brits!!  |
axxxr
Joined: Mar 21, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Londinium
PM, WWW
|
This was bound to happen at some point....we can well and truly hold the U.S responsible if some sort of war kicks off....but i am pleased the Iran has joined forced with the Democraticaly elected Government of Hamas.
[addsig] |
fatreg
Joined: Jul 26, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM |
im still going with the lets nuke em policy.
if you cant behave you get nuked, simple enough policy to stick to aint it??
aftreg
|
axxxr
Joined: Mar 21, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Londinium
PM, WWW
|
That policy sounds very american to me.. 
[addsig] |
fatreg
Joined: Jul 26, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM |
ermm theu would be the first people to get nuked!!
its a very fartregy policy 
fatreg
|
axxxr
Joined: Mar 21, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Londinium
PM, WWW
|
yeh thats what i was going to say...
[addsig] |
JK
Joined: Feb 24, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: S. Africa - JOZI
PM |
We'll have to wait for the 28th to see what happens! |
scotsboyuk
Joined: Jun 02, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: UK
PM, WWW
|
Quote:
|
On 2006-04-18 14:09:50, axxxr wrote:
This was bound to happen at some point....we can well and truly hold the U.S responsible if some sort of war kicks off....
|
|
The aggressive stance taken by the Iranian government having nothing to do with it of course ...
"I may be drunk my dear woman, but in the morning I will be sober, and you will still be ugly." WSC |
axxxr
Joined: Mar 21, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Londinium
PM, WWW
|
Quote:
|
On 2006-04-21 19:24:07, scotsboyuk wrote:
The aggressive stance taken by the Iranian government having nothing to do with it of course ...
|
|
Israel and the U.S have been showing their fists to Iran for decades now,so what if Iran chooses to do the same...they are a sovreign country and have just as much as a right to say anything like any other free country.
[addsig] |
Jim
Joined: Jan 20, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Belgium
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2006-04-21 19:47:58, axxxr wrote:
they are a sovreign country and have just as much as a right to say anything like any other free country.
|
|
Allright, what about that Danish cartoon incident then ? "Right to say anything", doesn't seem so ... 
|
axxxr
Joined: Mar 21, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Londinium
PM, WWW
|
Quote:
|
On 2006-04-21 20:08:24, Jim wrote:
Allright, what about that Danish cartoon incident then ? \"Right to say anything\", doesn't seem so ...
|
|
Thats was an direct attack on a religion,completely different scenario...religion is a sensitive subject for most people,so its best to avoid that..we have discussed this in depth in an earlier thread
[addsig] |
scotsboyuk
Joined: Jun 02, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: UK
PM, WWW
|
Quote:
|
On 2006-04-21 19:47:58, axxxr wrote:
Israel and the U.S have been showing their fists to Iran for decades now,so what if Iran chooses to do the same...they are a sovreign country and have just as much as a right to say anything like any other free country.
|
|
I don't seem to recall an American President or Israeli Prime Minister calling for Iran to be wiped off the map. It takes two to tango and and in this situation Iran is making the situation worse with the rhetoric we have seen so far. Hence the cause to avoid a war is not being helped by the Iranian government.
Under the terms of the NPT Iran has the right to develop nuclear energy for peaceful purposes. So one might ask why the West is worried. There are three points here:
Iran hid its nuclear programme for years.
Iran has vast energy reserves already, nuclear power is not essential for Iran.
The Iranian president has said that Israel should be destroyed and that it would be in a 'storm'.
If one takes these three factors together one can see why there is concern over the Iranian nuclear programme. Furthermore it is important to point out that neither China or Russia is actively against the Western nations in their opposition to the Iranian nuclear programme. Both no doubt realise that it would simply make the Middle Eas even more volatile.
Iran wants to be the regional power and we have seen moves towards that recently. Neither Iran nor the U.S. want a war in my opinion. Iran doesn't want a war because it knows it would have no chance of winning it. The U.S. doesn't want a war because it would make the global situation even worse as well as affecting the global economy and taxing their already stretched military forces.
Quote:
| Thats was an direct attack on a religion ... |
|
... or satire as many see it.
_________________
"I may be drunk my dear woman, but in the morning I will be sober, and you will still be ugly." WSC
[ This Message was edited by: scotsboyuk on 2006-04-21 20:00 ] |
Jim
Joined: Jan 20, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Belgium
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2006-04-21 20:25:20, axxxr wrote:
Thats was an direct attack on a religion,completely different scenario...religion is a sensitive subject for most people,so its best to avoid that..we have discussed this in depth in an earlier thread
|
|
So saying that a country should be wiped off the map is not a direct attack ? I think it's as sensitive as religion when your country is targetted ... (and with, maybe, future nuclear weapons on top). |
JK
Joined: Feb 24, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: S. Africa - JOZI
PM |
Iran and the rest of the world know that d us has a hidden agenda, they also just allowed china nuclear access n in the next breath askd Iran to stop theres. Hypocritical dont u think!  |
|
|
Posted: 2006-04-18 12:21
