| Author |
is that possible ! C905 - what the hell is wrong with this camera? |
gtr83
Joined: Sep 27, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: Indonesia
PM |
some of "their/its" fans would have made more point panonski 
Nokia 3520 > 6600 > W800i > W890i > C702 > C905 > BB 9500 > Samsung INNOV8 |
|
|
NightBlade
Joined: Jul 29, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Nessebar, Bulgaria
PM |
Why would you need to focus in landscape mode? Landscapes are too far away and vast to be in any need of close-up focusing. That's the whole point of the landscape mode!
|
panonski
Joined: Dec 13, 2008
Posts: 345
From: Croatia
PM |
On 2009-01-12 01:07:31, NightBlade wrote:
Why would you need to focus in landscape mode? Landscapes are too far away and vast to be in any need of close-up focusing. That's the whole point of the landscape mode!
because the quality of pics are much better in this mode. |
soane28
Joined: Jun 12, 2006
Posts: 401
From: NZ
PM |
If your expecting results like that, then get the INNOV8 or just a proper digital camera. Not a good idea to try to replace a digicam with a phone if your THAT fussy. |
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
panonski want to use 'twilight landscape' scene to make a bit clearer (longer exposure time and lower ISO) shot of the object near the camera without flash and with autofocus
there is no scene in Cyber-shot for this kind of photography
|
panonski
Joined: Dec 13, 2008
Posts: 345
From: Croatia
PM |
that would be so nice....  |
panonski
Joined: Dec 13, 2008
Posts: 345
From: Croatia
PM |
THIS PHOTO HAS SOME KIND OF "ESATO FILTER" / I notice that when I upload it /
Here is CROP /obviously it can't hide this watercolor effect /
Here is more CROP
AS YOU CAN SEE ..... THERE IS PLENTY OF LIGHT....
THIS IS THE REASON WHY "C905" CAN'T NEVER BE CALLED
"BEST PHOTOCAMERA"
This is sad. 
[ This Message was edited by: panonski on 2009-01-12 16:10 ] |
b737
Joined: Jul 15, 2007
Posts: 22
From: everywhere
PM, WWW
|
Maybe C905 got a 3MP camera?
http://www.saab4fun.com/upload/uppladd/29203Picture_666.jpg
_________________
Nothing to see here.
On 2009-01-12 17:06:35, panonski wrote:
Here is CROP /obviously it can't hide this watercolor effect /
his Message was edited by: panonski on 2009-01-12 16:10 ]
No, i cant see any "watercolor effects".
[ This Message was edited by: b737 on 2009-01-13 19:51 ]
[ This Message was edited by: b737 on 2009-01-13 19:53 ] |
panonski
Joined: Dec 13, 2008
Posts: 345
From: Croatia
PM |
esato upload tool have some "filter".
U can not see "water color" effect ( that's what I called noise )in these pics quite well.
Go there...
http://www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=180425 |
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
interpolation theory doesn't work for C905
|
panonski
Joined: Dec 13, 2008
Posts: 345
From: Croatia
PM |
On 2009-01-13 21:26:40, Raiderski wrote:
interpolation theory doesn't work for C905
I already know that.... This is what I call FAKE 8.1 MP
|
b737
Joined: Jul 15, 2007
Posts: 22
From: everywhere
PM, WWW
|
On 2009-01-13 21:26:40, Raiderski wrote:
interpolation theory doesn't work for C905
It does? Look at my picture.
It's not even 8.1, the pictures is 7.9902.
_________________
Nothing to see here.
[ This Message was edited by: b737 on 2009-01-13 21:05 ]
[ This Message was edited by: b737 on 2009-01-13 21:06 ] |
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
no, you cannot take picture in weak light and then try to prove that sharpness is weak. it will be weak always in weak light conditions
if interpolation theory is true then you should be able to change 5MP picture from C902 to 8MP
from this:
http://www.gsmarena.com/showp[....]eview/camera/gsmarena_f003.jpg
to this:
http://www.gsmarena.com/showp[....]-c905/camera/gsmarena_f005.jpg
[ This Message was edited by: Raiderski on 2009-01-13 21:39 ] |
MWEB
Joined: Feb 13, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: somewhere nicer than you
PM |
On 2009-01-12 12:05:32, soane28 wrote:
If your expecting results like that, then get the INNOV8 or just a proper digital camera. Not a good idea to try to replace a digicam with a phone if your THAT fussy.
Owned an Innov8 prior to a C905, pretty much equal, Xenon takes all after dark though, and Pannini or whatever, i think we pretty much get the picture that your kinda obsessed with dissing the C905, stop talking out your rear orifice and move along the bus. 
|
renstrand
Joined: May 02, 2009
Posts: 2
PM |
On 2009-01-12 12:05:32, soane28 wrote:
If your expecting results like that, then get the INNOV8 or just a proper digital camera. Not a good idea to try to replace a digicam with a phone if your THAT fussy.
BullsEye !!
There is no reason to go on ranting about the same issue:
- dissapointment is acceptable as a personal reaction, but when one person has had his say once, that should be enough.
Anyone who expects 400% "better" images just because a camera has 400% more pixels, is just ignorant.
Swallow that.
And these are not even cameras - they're telephones.
Basta.
P.S. The subject of digital photography can be studied at many other sites.
( I usually recommend ImagingResource.com , where you can learn quite a few good points on photography technique as well as check out thorough professional laboratory standard tests of real cameras. And no, they don't test phones w. 'cameras' ... ) |
|
|
Posted: 2009-01-11 23:49
