| Author |
Reception of T66 |
Aivar
Joined: Jan 14, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Estonia
PM |
Is in here anyone who use Ericsson T66?
What can you say about reception of T66? How bad or good is it? Can you compare the reception of T66 with some other phone? |
|
|
BobaFett
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
|
Its a lady fone imho. Wap, calendar etc almost every standard features are included, except irda and bt. As remember the reception is good, no special problems with it.
This message was posted from a T630 |
jcwhite_uk
Joined: Feb 18, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Dorset, UK Phone:Xperia Z1
PM, WWW
|
My girlfriend has a T66 in pink (proving its a girls phone). She loves it and always seems to have good reception.
Checkout my photos at My Website"Duct tape is like the force. It has a light side, a dark side, and it holds the world together." |
BobaFett
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
|
@aivar what colour is it? That fone looks great on a keychain. The battery pfrformance is good on it, but check it if any reason for it, hard to get a new one.
This message was posted from a T630 |
bart
Joined: Feb 03, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Flanders
PM, WWW
|
i've got one, RF can be compaired to a T600 
the RF is good but not as good as for example a K700.
the phone it self is very nice, good buttons, fast.
only 21down side in my eyes. the back light is green green and not aqua green like onn most /// phones.
you can see a small review of T66 vs T600 on my site
With Ericsson and Nokia gone: we must keep their spirits alive and buy JOLLA or YOTA |
Aivar
Joined: Jan 14, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Estonia
PM |
It's a bit surprising to hear that T66 has good reception. Of course it's a good surprise
Quite a lot of people here in Esato have complained about bad reception of T68, T610 and T630. I thought that T66 can't be better, but wanted to hear some comments.
To bobafett:
I don't plan to buy T66 for myself. Just asked because I have thought about the possible answer.
However, I really like this very small and light mobile phone (only 59 grams with battery!). I feel sad that T66 was produced during a very short period.
I don't like the design of it's follower SE T600, though the T600 had some good improvments (for example better screen with better illumination).
As SE will continue to produce quite a ugly looking phones (in my opinion), I'm a bit afraid that there will be no nice follower of T66/T600 in future. (Also I would prefer it with gray-scale screen.)
To bart:
Thanks for your reply also. After I have edited this post, I'll look your review T66 vs T600 on your site.
[ This Message was edited by: Aivar on 2004-08-23 15:31 ] |
BobaFett
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
|
As i know /// real time aerial, so it shows the actual quality of the reception. The aerial indicator moves almost constantly on /// fones.
This message was posted from a T630 |
Aivar
Joined: Jan 14, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Estonia
PM |
Have anyone compared the reception of T66 with the reception T68? |
BobaFett
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
|
I dont think there is a big difference, the aerial is almost the same, maybe at t68 is a bit better placed.
This message was posted from a T630 |
|
|
Posted: 2004-08-23 14:38
